Silver Foam Dressing Superior to Porcine Xenograft in Pediatric Scalds

NCT ID: NCT04410497

Last Updated: 2020-06-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

58 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-11

Study Completion Date

2018-05-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective randomized trial where two dressings has been compared for partial thickness scald burns in children 6 months to 6 years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare two different treatment regimes for children with partial-thickness scald burns. Burns were treated with either a porcine xenograft (EZderm®, Mölnlycke Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden) or a silver foam dressing (Mepilex® Ag, Mölnlycke Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden).

Methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial including 58 children admitted between May 2015 and May 2018 for partial-thickness scalds to The Burn Centre in Linkoping, Sweden. Primary outcome was time to wound closure. Secondary outcomes were pain, need of surgery, wound infection, length of hospital stay, required dressings changes, and labour time.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Burns Scald

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective randomised trial were children, after Guardians written consent,are randomized to one of two dressings.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Porcine xenograft

Conformité Européenne/European Conformity (CE)-marked dressing product used in clinical practise (Standard of care).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Porcine xenograft (wound dressings)

Intervention Type OTHER

commercial porcine xenograft, derived from acellular dermis from porcine.

Silver foam

Conformité Européenne/European Conformity (CE)- marked dressing product used in clinical practise

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Silver foam (wound dressings)

Intervention Type OTHER

commercial silver containing foam dressing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Porcine xenograft (wound dressings)

commercial porcine xenograft, derived from acellular dermis from porcine.

Intervention Type OTHER

Silver foam (wound dressings)

commercial silver containing foam dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EZderm from Mölnlycke Healthcare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden Mepilex Ag from Mölnlycke Healthcare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Partial-thickness scald burns admitted within 72 hours of injury and with burns suitable for porcine xenograft according to the burn surgeon on duty were eligible and enrolled after (guardians) consenting to participate.

Exclusion Criteria

* Children with other severe concomitant cutaneous trauma, skin disease, or children with a known hypersensitivity to silver.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Linkoeping

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Folke Sjoberg

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Johan Thorfinn, Ass.prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Linkoping Burn Centre, University hospital of Linkoping, Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Burn Centre at Linköping University Hospital,

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DPS-2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.