Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
117 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-12
2022-07-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Understanding and Addressing Patient and Provider Preferences Around Discussions of Cost of Breast Cancer Care
NCT03780491
Feasibility and Utilization of an Application-based Question Prompt List
NCT03676920
Patient-Centered Intervention to Reduce Cancer Patients' Financial Toxicity
NCT04314284
CARE Tool Study Aim 3
NCT07296887
Cost Communication and Financial Navigation in Cancer Patients (COSTCOM)
NCT06295367
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1: Usual Care
* Each participating urologic surgeon will begin in the usual care arm of the study. Subsequently, they will be randomized to the intervention arm at staggered time points to undergo training and begin using the Option Grid decision aid intervention with patients who are diagnosed with slow-growing prostate cancer.
* Usual Care-Participating clinicians have treatment options discussion with patients with slow-growing prostate cancer. Visits are audio-recorded and/or described by patient self-report measure.
No interventions assigned to this group
Arm 2: Option Grid
* Each participating urologic surgeon will begin in the usual care arm of the study. Subsequently, they will be randomized to the intervention arm at staggered time points to undergo training and begin using the Option Grid decision aid intervention with patients who are diagnosed with slow-growing prostate cancer.
* Decision Aid-Participating surgeons use an encounter decision aid to discuss treatment options with patients who have slow-growing prostate cancer. Visits are audio-recorded and/or evaluated by patient self-report measure.
Option Grid Decision Aid
-A table with side-by-side comparisons of treatment options organized as responses to patients' frequently asked questions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Option Grid Decision Aid
-A table with side-by-side comparisons of treatment options organized as responses to patients' frequently asked questions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Visiting a participating urologist/urologic surgeon to discuss treatment options
* Slow growing prostate cancer defined as Gleason score of 6 or 7 (3+4) and/or PSA (prostate-specific antigen) level less than 10ng/ml or at surgeon's discretion
* Must be patients of one of the participating providers
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
OTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mary Politi, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Glyn Elwyn, M.D., Ph.D., MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dartmouth College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Politi MC, Forcino RC, Parrish K, Durand MA, O'Malley AJ, Moses R, Cooksey K, Elwyn G. The impact of adding cost information to a conversation aid to support shared decision making about low-risk prostate cancer treatment: Results of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):2023-2039. doi: 10.1111/hex.13810. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
Politi MC, Forcino RC, Parrish K, Durand MA, O'Malley AJ, Elwyn G. Cost talk: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of an intervention helping patients and urologic surgeons discuss costs of care for slow-growing prostate cancer during shared decision-making. Trials. 2021 Jun 29;22(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05369-4.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202004249
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.