Place of Intrathecal Analgesia to Improve the Quality of Life of Painful Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT04388449
Last Updated: 2022-12-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
24 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-02-20
2022-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In literature, 2 qualitative studies have been published on the quality of life with intrathecal analgesia. A study realised in 2009 with 6 Canadian patients (3 interview per patients) and nurses in palliative unit shows the positive impact on the quality of life of patients. Recently, a qualitative study has approached the question of the quality of life of patients who had an intrathecal analgesia with the point of view of nursing staff. The results confirm the improvement of quality of life and suggest an establishment more premature of technic in the care process.
Given the development of this technic in cancerology in France and more premature in the care process of patients, it seems interesting to know better the experience of patients with cancer and for who the pain is treated by this technic and the impact on the quality of life of these patients sometimes dependent of some expert centres. This study is done to answer to theses questions on the experience of patients and their close relations and the impact of the quality of life according to a qualitative approach. An independent psychologist of process care of patients will realised semi-directed before putting on the equipment allowing the administration of analgesic by intrathecal pathway, at 1 month, then 3 months to know the experience when the balance of the pain is generally reached (M1) and the impact in long-term (M3).
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A psychologist comes in each centre to realise the semi-directed interviews before putting on the catheter, at 1 month and at 3 months after the establishment of this technic. The interview will be recorded with the agreement of the patient then totally transcribed. A double analysis will allow to extract the verbatim record and to construct the thematic tree with under-themes.
The same day of the interviews, 4 questionnaires will allow to evaluate to the 3 periods of measurement (before putting on the catheter, M1 et M3) : the mean pain of the past 24 hours by the BPI-SF (Brief Pain Inventory-short form) questionnaire, the anxiety and the depression by the HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) questionnaire, the quality of life by the QLQ-C30 questionnaire, the catastrophism by the PCS (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) questionnaire.
The evaluation by the patient and the algologist of the global clinic improvement after the establishment of the analgesic treatment by intrathecal way will be realised at M1 and M3 with the help of the questionnaire P-GIC and C-GIC (Patient or Clinical- Global Impression of Change).
The study does not interfere with the treatment of the patient and his usual care. No biological exams or imagery will be realise in this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient is able to answer to the questions during the semi-directed interview
* Patient has valid health insurance
* Having given written informed consent prior to any procedure related to the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient under guardianship or protection of vulnerable adults
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marie PECHARD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Institut Curie
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest
Angers, , France
INSERM U987 CHU A Paré - Institut Curie
Boulogne-Billancourt, , France
Hopital Foch
Suresnes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ICO-2019-18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id