Percutaneous Cryoablation in Treating Patients With Painful Bone Metastases
NCT ID: NCT00608855
Last Updated: 2017-01-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-11-30
2013-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying the side effects and how well percutaneous cryoablation works in treating patients with painful bone metastases.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multicenter Study of Cryoablation for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases
NCT02511678
Cryoablation or External-Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Painful Bone Metastases
NCT00540969
Safety and Efficacy of Cryoablation Combined With Radiation Therapy for the Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases
NCT01461252
Cryosurgery and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Painful Bone Metastases
NCT01767935
Radiofrequency Ablation in Relieving Pain in Patients With Bones Metastases
NCT00029029
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* To confirm the safety of percutaneous cryoablation in the palliative treatment of patients with painful bone metastases.
* To determine the benefits of cryoablation of painful bone metastases by assessing pain intensity using a standardized Cleeland Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and quality of life using a standardized SF-8 both before and after treatment.
* To determine the secondary benefits of cryoablation of painful bone metastases by assessing change in analgesic use following therapy.
* To determine the level of anesthesia required for cryoablation with a baseline level of conscious sedation planned for each treatment.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
Patients undergo percutaneous cryoablation to one or two sites of metastatic disease using the Endocare Cryocare system. Patients with a good initial response to treatment (≥ 2 decrease in pain intensity rating on the Brief Pain Inventory) who develop recurrent pain at the same site or a new painful site ≥ 1 month after initial treatment may undergo one additional cryoablation treatment.
Patients complete pain and quality of life questionnaires periodically.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for 2 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
questionnaire administration
cryosurgery
pain therapy
quality-of-life assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic solid tumor involving or abutting bone (index lesion)
* If the nature of the metastatic disease has been previously documented, index lesion to be treated does not require further documentation (i.e., biopsy)
* Pain either refractory to standard care (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, or analgesics) or patient is considered a poor candidate for conventional therapies
* Radiation oncology consult is required if the patient is considered clinically to be a candidate for conventional palliative radiotherapy
* Surgical oncology consult is required if the patient is considered clinically to be a candidate for conventional surgical treatment or is considered at risk for complications resulting from potential fracture
* Initial pain score ≥ 4 on a scale of 0-10 for the question "Please rate your pain by circling the one number that best describes your pain at its worst in the past 24 hours" on the Cleeland Brief Pain Inventory
* Pain from ≤ 2 sites of metastatic disease
* No lesions with evidence for impending fracture involving a weight-bearing bone (\> 50% loss of cortical bone at the site)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* Life expectancy ≥ 2 months
* Platelet count ≥ 75,000/mm³
* ANC \> 1,500/mm³ (for patients who have recently been treated with chemotherapy)
* INR ≤ 1.2
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* More than 3 weeks since prior radiotherapy
* More than 3 weeks since initiation of a new chemotherapy regimen, including bisphosphonates
* More than 7 days since prior antiplatelet medications or clopidogrel
* More than 3 days since prior acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), ibuprofen, or other NSAIDs
* No prior treatment of the portion of a lesion within 0.5 cm of the spinal cord or brain, within 0.5 cm of a large abdominal vessel such as the aorta or inferior vena cava, or within 1 cm of bowel or bladder
* No prior radiofrequency ablation for pain palliation of the same lesion
* No concurrent regular or low molecular weight heparin or other anticoagulants
18 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew R. Callstrom, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
NYU Cancer Institute at New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Brown University School of Medicine
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic at Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MAYO-MC03C3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MC03C3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.