Evaluation of a School-based Smoking Prevention and Cessation Programme in Negeri Sembilan
NCT ID: NCT04378725
Last Updated: 2020-06-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
349 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-15
2020-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of School-based Smoking Prevention Education Program Among Non-smoking Adolescents
NCT04036474
Evaluation of Adolescent Smoking Cessation Programs
NCT00714207
Adapting a Betel Quid Cessation Program for a High-risk Community in Malaysia and Evaluating Its Effectiveness
NCT05782166
Smoke-free Teens Programme
NCT03291132
Smoking Cessation for Fathers of Sick Children
NCT07014124
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* To determine the quit-smoking rate of the KOTAK programme
* To determine the factors associated with quitting smoking with the KOTAK programme
Important aspects of the KOTAK programme evaluation will involve assessing its impacts on preventing smoking initiation and promoting smoking cessation among the adolescents. This form of assessment is vital in achieving the KOTAK's objectives to reduce the prevalence of smokers in Malaysian schools. An average of 8 hours of training were required for dental officers and dental nurses to deliver the modules in the KOTAK programme. This programme has an important financial implication as it involved almost 4 thousand dental officers and 3 thousand dental nurses to screen almost 4.6 million Malaysian schoolchildren in 2018.
Factors yielding promising results for adolescents to quit smoking are important to be researched. This will provide us with valuable insights from the perspectives of the stakeholders pertaining on areas that needed improvement. Despite the existence of various tobacco-prevention program in public schools, KOTAK is deemed significant as it is a yearly collaboration of School Dental Services with the schools. This study will compare the quit smoking rate between Intervention (with KOTAK Programme) and Control (without KOTAK programme ) schools. The sampling unit was the school.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control School
When a student is screened as a smoker. The student will only be receiving Brief Intervention Advice from the dentist.
Brief Intervention advice: delivered to all schoolchildren regardless of smoking status by the dentist. Brief information of dangers of smoking was embedded in the generic lecture of Dental Health Education given to the whole school in large group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention School
The Intervention schools: Screened smokers were given Advanced Intervention sessions. After discussion with the State's oral health deputy director and district's programme coordinator, for the purpose of this study, the interval of the Advance Intervention session was decided at 1-month interval.
School-based smoking prevention and cessation program (The KOTAK program)
Advance Intervention: Following the screening process, this intervention package was inclusive of group-briefing for the smokers in at least 3 subsequent sessions in one academic year. The content delivered by the dentist were based on the KOTAK guidebook consisted of 8 Modules.The modules were as follows:
1. Introduction: Identifying students who smoke
2. Cigarette and addiction
3. The danger of smoking and passive smokers
4. Advantages of smoke-free lifestyle and adolescent perception on smoking
5. Legal and religious perception of smoking
6. The benefits of smoking cessation
7. Preparation and how to stop smoking
8. Nicotine withdrawal symptom and relapse prevention
The Intervention schools: Screened smokers were given Advanced Intervention sessions. After discussion with the State's oral health deputy director and district's programme coordinator, for the purpose of this study, the interval of the Advance Intervention session was decided at 1-month interval.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
School-based smoking prevention and cessation program (The KOTAK program)
Advance Intervention: Following the screening process, this intervention package was inclusive of group-briefing for the smokers in at least 3 subsequent sessions in one academic year. The content delivered by the dentist were based on the KOTAK guidebook consisted of 8 Modules.The modules were as follows:
1. Introduction: Identifying students who smoke
2. Cigarette and addiction
3. The danger of smoking and passive smokers
4. Advantages of smoke-free lifestyle and adolescent perception on smoking
5. Legal and religious perception of smoking
6. The benefits of smoking cessation
7. Preparation and how to stop smoking
8. Nicotine withdrawal symptom and relapse prevention
The Intervention schools: Screened smokers were given Advanced Intervention sessions. After discussion with the State's oral health deputy director and district's programme coordinator, for the purpose of this study, the interval of the Advance Intervention session was decided at 1-month interval.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Public funded school
2. Daily school
3. Non- same gendered schools (co-ed )
4. Multiracial school
Exclusion Criteria
1. Private schools
2. Boarding school
3. Same-gendered school
4. Vernacular schools
13 Years
17 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Malaya
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roslan Saub, BDS MDSc PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Malaya
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya
Kuala Lumpur, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DFC01811/0080(P)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.