A Randomized, Double-blind Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of EDP-305 in Subjects With Liver-biopsy Proven NASH

NCT ID: NCT04378010

Last Updated: 2023-05-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-27

Study Completion Date

2021-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized, double-blind study to assess the safety and efficacy of EDP-305 in subjects with liver-biopsy proven Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this Phase 2b study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of the investigational novel FXR agonist, EDP-305, in a population of patients with liver biopsy proven NASH.

This Phase 2b study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two doses of EDP-305 compared to placebo for the treatment of NASH in subjects with liver biopsy proven NASH. As suggested in the FDA guidance, this late stage Phase 2 study explored the effect of EDP-305/placebo treatment on histological endpoints. The patient population selected for inclusion in the study was designed to represent the target population for treatment. Specifically, in patients with liver disease, there is a significant overlap of NASH and various metabolic conditions including obesity and T2DM. In order to be reflective of the NASH population, these patients were not excluded from participation in this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EDP-305 1.5 mg

Once a day orally for 72 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EDP-305 1.5 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet

EDP-305 2 mg

Once a day orally for 72 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EDP-305 2 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet

Placebo

Once a day orally for 72 weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EDP-305 1.5 mg

Tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

EDP-305 2 mg

Tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EDP-305 EDP-305

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Informed consent documentation signed and dated by the participant.
* Male and female participants, of all ethnic origins, between the ages of 18 and 75 years, inclusive.
* Participants of all ethnic origins had to have a Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 25 kg/m2 and ≤ 45 except Asian participants who qualified for the study with BMI \> 23 kg/m2.
* Histological evidence of definite NASH based on NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) criteria obtained from assessment of a liver biopsy by the central histopathologist. The biopsy may be obtained either 1) during the Screening window or 2) within 26 weeks prior to the Screening visit.
* NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) of 4 or greater with a score of at least 1 in each component of the NAS (steatosis scored 0-3, lobular inflammation scored 0-3, ballooning scored 0-2).
* Fibrosis stage 2 or 3 using the NASH CRN Histologic Scoring System.
* Participants had to have Screening laboratory values for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) 1 and 2 antibodies (Ab) as seronegative. \[Note: participants previously infected by chronic hepatitis C and treated with direct acting antivirals (DAAs) with sustained virologic response (SVR) for at least 3 years were allowed.\]
* A woman of childbearing potential who was sexually active with a male had to agree to use two effective methods of contraception from the date of Screening until 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
* A male participant who had not had a vasectomy and was sexually active with a woman of childbearing potential had to agree to use effective contraception from the date of Screening to 90 days after the last dose of study drug.
* Participant had to be willing and able to adhere to the assessments, visit schedules, prohibitions and restrictions, as described in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

* Laboratory Screening results as indicated below:

* Total white blood cells (WBC) \<3000 cells/mm3
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \<1500 cells/mm3
* Platelet count \<140,000/mm3
* International Normalized Ratio, INR \>1.2 (unless due to use of anticoagulants)
* Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 60 mL/min according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation
* AST ≥5× ULN
* ALT ≥5× ULN
* ALP ≥2× ULN
* Total bilirubin \> 1.5 times ULN during Screening. \[Note: Patients with Gilbert's syndrome were allowed following review by the Medical Monitor if they had a known history of Gilbert's syndrome with a normal direct bilirubin value and normal reticulocyte count.\]
* Pregnant or nursing females.
* MELD: Model for End-stage Liver Disease score \>12.
* Clinical or laboratory evidence of known chronic liver disease such as alcoholic liver disease, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson disease, iron overload, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, drug-induced liver injury, known or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
* History of acute liver complications due to gallstones (e.g., acute cholecystitis or acute biliary obstruction) unless the participant had a cholecytectomy (more than 3 months prior to screening).
* History of liver transplant, or current placement on a liver transplant list.
* Hepatorenal syndrome (type I or II).
* Prior variceal hemorrhage, uncontrolled encephalopathy, liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh Class A, B, and C, esophageal varices, or refractory ascites within the previous 26 weeks of Screening and/or histological presence of liver cirrhosis.
* Prior or planned ileal resection, or prior or planned bariatric surgery. \[Note: Participants who had undergone gastric surgeries that did not affect drug absorption (e.g., gastric band or gastric sleeve procedures) were allowed if they were stable for at least 1 year prior to Screening. Gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y bypass was allowed if stable for at least 3 years prior to Screening.\]
* Participants with clinically or otherwise documented cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease including clinically significant anomalies of rhythm or pattern of ECG, that in the judgement of the Principal Investigator (PI) could affect the safety of the participant or their ability to comply with the study requirements.
* HbA1c ≥ 9.5% within 60 days prior to Day 1.
* Use of a new antidiabetic regimen in the months prior to Screening including metformin, glucagon-like peptide (GLP) 1 agonists, sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, sulfonylureas, or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors, insulin or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ agonists (e.g., pioglitazone or rosiglitazone). For pre-existing antidiabetic treatment, participants were to be on a stable dose of antidiabetic drugs: (1) for at least 8 weeks (for metformin and/or sulfonylureas), (2) 12 weeks (for SGLT2 or DPP4 inhibitors), or (3) 12 weeks (for GLP-1 receptor agonists and thiazolidinediones) prior to Screening with the intention to keep the regimen stable during the study.
* Use of a new statin regimen or other lipid lowering agents from 12 weeks prior to Screening.
* Use of a new fibrate regimen from 12 weeks prior to Screening.
* Participants with contraindications to MRI imaging, or not being able to have the MRI performed.
* Participant had received any investigational agent (including investigational vaccine) or biological product within 30 days or 5 times the half-life (whichever was longer) prior to the planned first dose of study drug.
* Use of an experimental or approved treatment for NASH within 26 weeks of Screening.
* Prior use of OCA within 26 weeks of Screening and/or concurrent treatment with OCA (or any other FXR agonists).
* Use of systemic immunosuppressant (e.g., corticosteroids) for more than 4 weeks in duration within 1 year prior to Screening with the intention to continue during the study (chronic use of inhaled, topical, ophthalmological, nasal corticosteroids was allowed)
* Use of any prohibited concomitant medications, including systemic CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers, within 14 days prior to the first dose of study drug and for the duration of the study.
* Clinically significant history of drug sensitivity or drug allergy, as determined by the PI.
* Current or history of significant alcohol consumption defined as: \>14 standard drinks per week and/or ≥4 standard drinks per occasion for males and \>7 standard drinks per week and/or ≥3 standard drinks per occasion for females.
* History of substance (including alcohol) abuse and in the judgement of the PI, the participant was not suitable for participation in the study.
* Any other condition(s) that would compromise the safety of the participant or compromise the quality of the clinical study, as judged by the PI.
* Use of medication for weight loss or appetite reduction (e.g., orlistat, bupropion/naltrexone, phentermine-topiramate, phentermine, lorcaserin, non-prescription supplements) at Screening.
* History of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized and considered cured cutaneous basal or squamous cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer), treated or untreated, within 5 years of Screening.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arizona Liver Health

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

The Institute of Liver Health

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Dignity Health DBA St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Del Sol Research Management LLC

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Rajeev Krishan, MD, Inc

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

eStudy Site

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Southern California Research Center

Coronado, California, United States

Site Status

St. Jude Hospital Yorba Linda DBA St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

National Institute of Clinical Research, Inc

Garden Grove, California, United States

Site Status

eStudySite - La Mesa

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Om Research LLC

Lancaster, California, United States

Site Status

Keck Medical Center Of USC

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Inland Empire Liver Foundation

Rialto, California, United States

Site Status

UC Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Southern California Gastrointestinal and Liver Centers

San Clemente, California, United States

Site Status

Precision Research Institute, Llc

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Paradigm Clinical Research Institute

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Universal Axon Clinical Research

Doral, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fleming Island Center for Clinical Research

Fleming Island, Florida, United States

Site Status

Universal Axon- Homestead, LLC

Homestead, Florida, United States

Site Status

Nature Coast Clinical Research

Inverness, Florida, United States

Site Status

Westside Center for Clinical Research

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville Center for Endoscopy - Southside ; Borland Groover Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Encore Borland Groover Clinical Research

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Meridien Research

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Meridien Research

Maitland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Associates of South Florida

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine-Don Soffer Clinical Research Center

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Well Pharma Medical Research, Corp.

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Med Research Of Florida, LLC

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

San Marcus Research Clinic, Inc.

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala GI Research

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

IMIC, Inc.

Palmetto Bay, Florida, United States

Site Status

Meridien Research

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Guardian Angel Research

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Agile Clinical Research Trials, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center - University Cardiovascular Surgeons

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Digestive Research Alliance of Michiana

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University Of Iowa Hospital & Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Health System

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Mercy Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Digestive Disease Associates, PA

Catonsville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Mid-Atlantic GI Research

Greenbelt, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Health Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Southern Therapy and Advanced Research LLC GI Associates and Endoscopy Center

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

St. Louis Univ. School Of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

AGA Clinical Research Associates, LLC

Egg Harbor, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Intercity Gastroenterology

Fresh Meadows, New York, United States

Site Status

New York University Medical Centre

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Northeast GI Research Division

Concord, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Carolinas HealthCare System Digestive - Huntersville

Huntersville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Lucas Research

Morehead City, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic - Taussig Cancer Institute

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center - Center for Liver Diseases

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Digestive Health Research, LLC

Hermitage, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Digestive Health Research

Lebanon, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Quality Medical Research

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas Clinical Research Institute

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Crescent Health Clinical

DeSoto, Texas, United States

Site Status

DHAT Research Institute

Garland, Texas, United States

Site Status

American Research Corporation at The Texas Liver Institute

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trials of Texas, Inc.

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bon Secours St. Mary's Hospital of Richmond, Inc

Newport News, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Liver Institute Northwest

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

CINME

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina

Site Status

University of Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet Frankfurt

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz KoeR

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Latin Clinical Trial Center

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

MediNova West London Quality Research Site

Wokingham, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

MeDiNova East London Quality Research Site

Romford, Essex, United Kingdom

Site Status

King's College Hospital - King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status

MeDiNova South London Quality Research Site

Sidcup, Kent, United Kingdom

Site Status

MeDiNova Northampton Dedicated research site

Corby, Northamptonshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

MeDiNova Warwickshire Quality Research Site

Kenilworth, Warwickshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

MeDiNova Yorkshire Quality Research Site

Shipley, Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

MeDiNova North London Quality Research Site

Middlesex, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Canada Germany Puerto Rico United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-003876-38

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EDP 305-102

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.