Ablation of Fibrotic Areas in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

NCT ID: NCT04377594

Last Updated: 2025-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-20

Study Completion Date

2026-04-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Brief summary: The objective of this study is to compare two different ablation strategies in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation and fibrotic areas in the left atrium. The participant will be randomized to pulmonary vein isolation or pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation of fibrotic areas.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice with a prevalence of 2-3 percent in the population. Catheter ablation performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established treatment, which aim to eliminate triggers from the pulmonary veins. This treatment is successful in most patients with paroxysmal AF. In many patients, especially the patients with persistent AF, this treatment is not sufficiently to achieve freedom from arrhythmia and symptoms.

There are several studies showing that fibrosis in the left atrium (LA) is an independent factor to relapse in AF after PVI. The fibrotic areas can be detected by measuring the voltage in the left atrium and creating a voltage map. There are non-randomized studies that suggest better results regarding reduction of arrhythmia burden after ablating the low voltage areas (LVAs). This ablation strategy is commonly used in clinical praxis although there are no randomized studies in this field.

Aim:

The objective of this study is to compare two different ablation strategies in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation and fibrotic areas in the left atrium. The participant will be randomized to PVI versus PVI plus ablation of LVAs.

The primary endpoint is freedom of atrial arrhythmias after 1 to 2 ablation procedures within 6 months measured at 12 months after the first ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs. Secondary endpoints will be atrial arrhythmia burden, health related quality of life measured by AFEQT score, and RAND 36 and periprocedural complications; death, stroke/ TIA, tamponade, atrio-esophageal fistula, and atrioventricular block.

Study design:

Randomized controlled multicenter trial. The study will be single blinded. All the participants will undergo PVI and the substrate map will be collected during atrial pacing. The patients with LVA will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to; PVI plus ablation of LVA or PVI alone. Follow up visits will be at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Before ablation and at every follow up visit the participants will fill in arrhythmia symptom specific questionnaires (AFEQT and ASTA) and questionnaire about quality of life (RAND 36). The participants will register arrhythmia with a heart monitoring system if symptoms of arrhythmia and two times daily during two weeks before every follow up visit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomization 1:1
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pulmonary vein isolation plus substrate modification

Pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation of low voltage areas in the left atrium

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radio frequency ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Two different radio frequency ablation procedures

Pulmonary vein isolation

Pulmonary vein isolation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radio frequency ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Two different radio frequency ablation procedures

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radio frequency ablation

Two different radio frequency ablation procedures

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ECG-documented persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) definition
2. Symptoms e. g. palpitations, dyspnea, tiredness that is due to the atrial fibrillation.
3. Suitable candidate for catheter ablation.
4. Tried one or more antiarrhythmic drugs or unwilling to try antiarrhythmic drugs
5. Age ≥18 years.

Exclusion Criteria

1. LA dimension \>55 mm as determined by an echocardiography within the previous year
2. Acute coronary syndrome or coronary artery bypass surgery within 12 weeks
3. Severe aortic or mitral valvular heart disease using the ESC guidelines
4. Congenital heart disease
5. Prior surgical or percutaneous AF ablation procedure or atrioventricular-nodal ablation
6. Medical condition likely to limit survival to \< 1 year
7. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure symptoms
8. Contraindication to oral anticoagulation
9. Renal failure requiring dialysis
10. AF due to reversible cause
11. Pregnant and fertile women without anticonception
12. History of non-compliance to medical therapy
13. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mats Jensen-Urstad

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mats Jensen-Urstad, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Karolinska University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lloyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP, Larson MG, Levy D, Vasan RS, D'Agostino RB, Massaro JM, Beiser A, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004 Aug 31;110(9):1042-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140263.20897.42. Epub 2004 Aug 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15313941 (View on PubMed)

Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 7;37(38):2893-2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. Epub 2016 Aug 27. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27567408 (View on PubMed)

Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Cosedis Nielsen J, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d'Avila A, Natasja de Groot NMS, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T; Document Reviewers:. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):e1-e160. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux274. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29016840 (View on PubMed)

Tilz RR, Rillig A, Thum AM, Arya A, Wohlmuth P, Metzner A, Mathew S, Yoshiga Y, Wissner E, Kuck KH, Ouyang F. Catheter ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: 5-year outcomes of the Hamburg Sequential Ablation Strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 6;60(19):1921-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.060. Epub 2012 Oct 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23062545 (View on PubMed)

Scherr D, Khairy P, Miyazaki S, Aurillac-Lavignolle V, Pascale P, Wilton SB, Ramoul K, Komatsu Y, Roten L, Jadidi A, Linton N, Pedersen M, Daly M, O'Neill M, Knecht S, Weerasooriya R, Rostock T, Manninger M, Cochet H, Shah AJ, Yeim S, Denis A, Derval N, Hocini M, Sacher F, Haissaguerre M, Jais P. Five-year outcome of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using termination of atrial fibrillation as a procedural endpoint. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;8(1):18-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001943. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25528745 (View on PubMed)

Verma A, Wazni OM, Marrouche NF, Martin DO, Kilicaslan F, Minor S, Schweikert RA, Saliba W, Cummings J, Burkhardt JD, Bhargava M, Belden WA, Abdul-Karim A, Natale A. Pre-existent left atrial scarring in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation: an independent predictor of procedural failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jan 18;45(2):285-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.035.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15653029 (View on PubMed)

Oakes RS, Badger TJ, Kholmovski EG, Akoum N, Burgon NS, Fish EN, Blauer JJ, Rao SN, DiBella EV, Segerson NM, Daccarett M, Windfelder J, McGann CJ, Parker D, MacLeod RS, Marrouche NF. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2009 Apr 7;119(13):1758-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.811877. Epub 2009 Mar 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19307477 (View on PubMed)

Rolf S, Kircher S, Arya A, Eitel C, Sommer P, Richter S, Gaspar T, Bollmann A, Altmann D, Piedra C, Hindricks G, Piorkowski C. Tailored atrial substrate modification based on low-voltage areas in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;7(5):825-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001251. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25151631 (View on PubMed)

Yagishita A, Sparano D, Cakulev I, Gimbel JR, Phelan T, Mustafa H, De Oliveira S, Mackall J, Arruda M. Identification and electrophysiological characterization of early left atrial structural remodeling as a predictor for atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Jun;28(6):642-650. doi: 10.1111/jce.13211. Epub 2017 May 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28387462 (View on PubMed)

Schreiber D, Rieger A, Moser F, Kottkamp H. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with box isolation of fibrotic areas: Lessons on fibrosis distribution and extent, clinical characteristics, and their impact on long-term outcome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;28(9):971-983. doi: 10.1111/jce.13278. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28635186 (View on PubMed)

Kottkamp H, Bender R, Berg J. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: how to modify the substrate? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;65(2):196-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.034.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25593061 (View on PubMed)

Phlips T, Taghji P, El Haddad M, Wolf M, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Duytschaever M. Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the 'CLOSE'-protocol. Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(FI_3):f419-f427. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux376.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29315411 (View on PubMed)

El Haddad M, Taghji P, Phlips T, Wolf M, Demolder A, Choudhury R, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Nakagawa H, Duytschaever M. Determinants of Acute and Late Pulmonary Vein Reconnection in Contact Force-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Identifying the Weakest Link in the Ablation Chain. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Apr;10(4):e004867. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004867.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28381417 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

200212IDEALAF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
NCT03410966 COMPLETED NA