Investigation of Therapeutic Ablation Versus Cardioversion for AF

NCT ID: NCT03907982

Last Updated: 2025-06-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2023-04-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main aim of the research is to investigate whether patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with cryoablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) will have lower rates of AF recurrence than those treated by DC cardioversion without an ablation procedure. The objectives of the Pilot Study are to validate the key study logistics with a view to optimising methods to be used in the main study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After adequate stroke prevention (e.g. anticoagulation) and rate control, the optimum strategy for patients who continue to be symptomatic with persistent AF has not been established. Cardioversion with antiarrhythmic medication is commonly used as a first-line rhythm control strategy despite very high recurrence rates of the index arrhythmia and high serious complications associated with this strategy. Further treatment options, such as catheter ablation or implantation of a pacemaker and ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) node, are considered once AF recurs. The benefits of first-line ablation in patients presenting with persistent AF has not been tested. We seek to perform a blinded, randomised trial comparing an electrical cardioversion-led strategy with a pulmonary-vein isolation strategy for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation.

No blinded randomised controlled trial comparing early-ablation strategies to cardioversion-led strategies has been performed. The rationale for blinding where possible in clinical trials is well established. The recently published ORBITA trial performed a blinded, multicentre randomised trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in stable angina compared to a placebo procedure. This trial demonstrated that the efficacy of invasive procedures can be assessed with a placebo procedure and that this type of trial remains necessary. Knowledge of treatment assignment influences physician behaviour, drug recommendations and encourages bias in outcome reporting. The treatment effect size and the effects of confounding factors will be exaggerated and thus limit the interpretation of the true patient experienced outcomes either strategy. In a comparison of surgical procedures, a sham-control arm represents the gold standard of blinding. A systematic review of placebo-controlled surgical trials found no evidence of harm to participants assigned to the placebo group. For a procedure whose primary purpose is to give sustained symptomatic relief, definitive quantification of the true placebo-controlled effect size of AF ablation is necessary. There is a need to clarify the relationship between patient reported symptoms and the arrhythmia itself. Patient reported symptoms may not always be related to the severity of the arrhythmia or quality of life. No bias-resistant blinded, randomised, trial has yet been performed seeking to measure the benefits of AF ablation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Cardiac Arrhythmia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Internal Pilot as part of a future study, Randomised, blinded, controlled trial with 2 arms.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Patient and physician - blinded randomisation to intervention (DCCV, or Pulmonary Vein Isolation plus DCCV)

Once subject participation in the trial is complete, the patient and physician will be unblinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DCCV + PVI

DC cardioversion (DCCV) plus Pulmonary Vein Isolation (Cryoablation)

At end of pulmonary vein isolation, DCCV performed (if patient still in AF). An implantable loop recorder will be inserted in the prepectoral area with local anaesthetic at the end of the procedure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DC Cardioversion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

DC cardioversion (DCCV) is used to treat irregular heart rhythms (commonly atrial fibrillation). The procedure involves sedation or anaesthetic and placement of electrodes on the chest. An electrical impulse is passed across the electrodes to return the heart rhythm to normal.

Pulmonary vein isolation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The cryoballoon (CE marked) is the key specified technique for performing pulmonary vein isolation in the ablation arm in this trial. This allows the physician electrophysiologist to perform a circumferential freeze around the pulmonary veins to electrically isolate the vein, thus preventing pulmonary vein ectopy from triggering AF.

Implantable loop recorder

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Reveal device is inserted in the pre-pectoral position under the skin. This is performed with local anaesthetic and sedation at the end of the procedure clinic by the electrophysiologist performing the procedure. The device will provide a continuous recording of the heart rhythm and rate, and will be able to down load duration of AF episodes via a home monitoring system to establish the primary endpoint of the study.

DC cardioversion (DCCV)

Acute treatment of heart rhythm by cardioversion. An implantable loop recorder will be inserted in the prepectoral area with local anaesthetic at the end of the procedure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DC Cardioversion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

DC cardioversion (DCCV) is used to treat irregular heart rhythms (commonly atrial fibrillation). The procedure involves sedation or anaesthetic and placement of electrodes on the chest. An electrical impulse is passed across the electrodes to return the heart rhythm to normal.

Implantable loop recorder

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Reveal device is inserted in the pre-pectoral position under the skin. This is performed with local anaesthetic and sedation at the end of the procedure clinic by the electrophysiologist performing the procedure. The device will provide a continuous recording of the heart rhythm and rate, and will be able to down load duration of AF episodes via a home monitoring system to establish the primary endpoint of the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DC Cardioversion

DC cardioversion (DCCV) is used to treat irregular heart rhythms (commonly atrial fibrillation). The procedure involves sedation or anaesthetic and placement of electrodes on the chest. An electrical impulse is passed across the electrodes to return the heart rhythm to normal.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pulmonary vein isolation

The cryoballoon (CE marked) is the key specified technique for performing pulmonary vein isolation in the ablation arm in this trial. This allows the physician electrophysiologist to perform a circumferential freeze around the pulmonary veins to electrically isolate the vein, thus preventing pulmonary vein ectopy from triggering AF.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Implantable loop recorder

The Reveal device is inserted in the pre-pectoral position under the skin. This is performed with local anaesthetic and sedation at the end of the procedure clinic by the electrophysiologist performing the procedure. The device will provide a continuous recording of the heart rhythm and rate, and will be able to down load duration of AF episodes via a home monitoring system to establish the primary endpoint of the study.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LINQ

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ability to give informed consent
* Age 18-80 years
* Persistent AF (atrial fibrillation lasting \> 7days) of total continuous duration \<2 years as documented in medical notes.
* Patients being considered for cardioversion.

Exclusion Criteria

* Creatinine clearance (eGFR) \< 30mls/min
* Contraindication or unable to take anticoagulation
* Known contraindication to or unable to tolerate amiodarone
* Uncontrolled hypertension
* Contraindication to catheter ablation
* BMI \> 35
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Barts & The London NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Schilling, FRCP MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Barts & The London NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Barts Health NHS Trust - St Bartholomew's Hospital and Whipps Cross Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wartolowska K, Judge A, Hopewell S, Collins GS, Dean BJ, Rombach I, Brindley D, Savulescu J, Beard DJ, Carr AJ. Use of placebo controls in the evaluation of surgery: systematic review. BMJ. 2014 May 21;348:g3253. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3253.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24850821 (View on PubMed)

Redberg RF. Sham controls in medical device trials. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):892-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1406388. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25184861 (View on PubMed)

Miller FG, Kaptchuk TJ. Sham procedures and the ethics of clinical trials. J R Soc Med. 2004 Dec;97(12):576-8. doi: 10.1177/014107680409701205. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15574854 (View on PubMed)

Jones C, Pollit V, Fitzmaurice D, Cowan C; Guideline Development Group. The management of atrial fibrillation: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014 Jun 19;348:g3655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3655. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24948694 (View on PubMed)

Brim RL, Miller FG. The potential benefit of the placebo effect in sham-controlled trials: implications for risk-benefit assessments and informed consent. J Med Ethics. 2013 Nov;39(11):703-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101045. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23239742 (View on PubMed)

Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, Sen S, Tang K, Davies J, Keeble T, Mielewczik M, Kaprielian R, Malik IS, Nijjer SS, Petraco R, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Howard J, Baker C, Sharp A, Gerber R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Mayet J, Wensel R, Collier D, Shun-Shin M, Thom SA, Davies JE, Francis DP; ORBITA investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Jan 6;391(10115):31-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29103656 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ORBITA-AF Pilot study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cardiac Denervation in Aortic Arch Replacement
NCT06927908 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA