Atorvastatin Effect on Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Intervention
NCT ID: NCT04375787
Last Updated: 2022-02-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-15
2020-06-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of the Effect of Atorvastatin on Prevention of CIN in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography
NCT02113540
High Dose Atorvastatin for Preventing Contrast-induced Nephropathy
NCT02114346
Statins for Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy
NCT00770796
Atorvastatin Effects On Arterial Stiffness In Hemodialysis
NCT04472637
The Role of Statins in the Prevention of Contrast-induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases
NCT04666389
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
200 diabetic patients with indication for coronary intervention participated in the study. 100 patients were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin (80 mg) just before coronary intervention (statin group) and 100 patients received placebo (control group). An informed written consent for participating in the study was obtained from each participant.
Exclusion criteria:
1. Current statin treatment within the previous three months.
2. Chronic renal failure patients on renal dialysis, or serum creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl.
3. Severe co-morbidities i.e. patients with cancer, advanced liver cirrhosis.
4. Contraindications to statin therapy.
5. Contrast media injection within the preceding 10 days.
6. Pregnancy.
7. Refusal of consent. (B) Methodology:
All study patients were subjected to:
1. Full clinical history: including age, sex, history of smoking, hypertension, history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), duration of diabetes mellitus (DM) and type of anti-DM treatment.
2. Thorough physical examination focusing on:
* General examination including intra-procedural hemodynamic assessment.
* Cardiac examination to elicit manifestations of heart failure.
3. Echocardiography searching for wall motion abnormalities and estimation of left ventricular systolic function.
4. Initial venous blood samples for determination of hemoglobin level and serum creatinine before the procedure. Follow up for serum creatinine at 48 hours post-procedure was done.
CIN was stated as a raising of serum creatinine of more than 25% or ≥0.5 mg/dl (44 μmol/l) from initial level within 48 hours of the angiographic procedure and after excluding other factors that may cause nephropathy such as nephrotoxic drugs.
5. All patients received clopidogrel (600 mg) or ticagrelor (180 mg). Any nephrotoxic drugs (i.e., metformin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) were withdrawn on admission.
6. Coronary intervention was done using the same non-ionic, low-osmolar contrast medium (Iopamidol; Scanlux, Sanochemia, Austria) in all cases.
After the procedure, TIMI flow of the culprit artery was assessed, as well as the volume of used contrast media and time of X-ray exposure.
7. Statistical analysis:
Data were processed by statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS, version 20. 0). Descriptive statistics for interval and ordinal variables were calculated such as the ranges, means, and standard deviations, whereas, for categorical variables, the frequencies and percentages were reported. Student t-test or paired t-test, as appropriate, were used to compare normal and continuous variables. Chi-square test was used for comparing categorical variables. The level of significance was stated at P \< 0.05. Receiver operating curves (ROC) were plotted and area under the curve (AUC) was assessed for some studied variables. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at a cutoff point. A p value of \<0.05 was considered significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Statin group
100 patients were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin (80 mg) just before coronary intervention
Atorvastatin
Patients received 80 mg atorvastatin before elective coronary angiography
Placebo group
100 patients received placebo
Atorvastatin
Patients received 80 mg atorvastatin before elective coronary angiography
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Atorvastatin
Patients received 80 mg atorvastatin before elective coronary angiography
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Chronic renal failure patients on renal dialysis, or serum creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl.
3. Severe co-morbidities i.e. patients with cancer, advanced liver cirrhosis.
4. Contraindications to statin therapy.
5. Contrast media injection within the preceding 10 days.
6. Pregnancy.
7. Refusal of consent.
30 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mohamed Abdelfatah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Abdelfatah
investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ayman Ibrahem, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Assiut University
Ahmed Abdel-Galeel, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut University
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mohammed NM, Mahfouz A, Achkar K, Rafie IM, Hajar R. Contrast-induced Nephropathy. Heart Views. 2013 Jul;14(3):106-16. doi: 10.4103/1995-705X.125926.
Bolognese L, Falsini G, Schwenke C, Grotti S, Limbruno U, Liistro F, Carrera A, Angioli P, Picchi A, Ducci K, Pierli C. Impact of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast agents on contrast-induced nephropathy and tissue reperfusion in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Following Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction [CONTRAST-AMI] Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jan 1;109(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
Perrin T, Descombes E, Cook S. Contrast-induced nephropathy in invasive cardiology. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Jun 19;142:w13608. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13608. eCollection 2012.
McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, Davidson C, Lameire N, Stacul F, Tumlin J; CIN Consensus Working Panel. Epidemiology and prognostic implications of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 18;98(6A):5K-13K. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.019. Epub 2006 Feb 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Atorvastatin in elective CA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.