Atorvastatin Effect on Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Intervention

NCT ID: NCT04375787

Last Updated: 2022-02-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-15

Study Completion Date

2020-06-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Investigate of the potential benefit of acute pretreatment with high dose atorvastatin (80 mg) in reduction of the incidence of CIN in diabetic patients indicated for elective coronary intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled study. The ethical committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University approved the study protocol.

200 diabetic patients with indication for coronary intervention participated in the study. 100 patients were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin (80 mg) just before coronary intervention (statin group) and 100 patients received placebo (control group). An informed written consent for participating in the study was obtained from each participant.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Current statin treatment within the previous three months.
2. Chronic renal failure patients on renal dialysis, or serum creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl.
3. Severe co-morbidities i.e. patients with cancer, advanced liver cirrhosis.
4. Contraindications to statin therapy.
5. Contrast media injection within the preceding 10 days.
6. Pregnancy.
7. Refusal of consent. (B) Methodology:

All study patients were subjected to:

1. Full clinical history: including age, sex, history of smoking, hypertension, history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), duration of diabetes mellitus (DM) and type of anti-DM treatment.
2. Thorough physical examination focusing on:

* General examination including intra-procedural hemodynamic assessment.
* Cardiac examination to elicit manifestations of heart failure.
3. Echocardiography searching for wall motion abnormalities and estimation of left ventricular systolic function.
4. Initial venous blood samples for determination of hemoglobin level and serum creatinine before the procedure. Follow up for serum creatinine at 48 hours post-procedure was done.

CIN was stated as a raising of serum creatinine of more than 25% or ≥0.5 mg/dl (44 μmol/l) from initial level within 48 hours of the angiographic procedure and after excluding other factors that may cause nephropathy such as nephrotoxic drugs.
5. All patients received clopidogrel (600 mg) or ticagrelor (180 mg). Any nephrotoxic drugs (i.e., metformin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) were withdrawn on admission.
6. Coronary intervention was done using the same non-ionic, low-osmolar contrast medium (Iopamidol; Scanlux, Sanochemia, Austria) in all cases.

After the procedure, TIMI flow of the culprit artery was assessed, as well as the volume of used contrast media and time of X-ray exposure.
7. Statistical analysis:

Data were processed by statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS, version 20. 0). Descriptive statistics for interval and ordinal variables were calculated such as the ranges, means, and standard deviations, whereas, for categorical variables, the frequencies and percentages were reported. Student t-test or paired t-test, as appropriate, were used to compare normal and continuous variables. Chi-square test was used for comparing categorical variables. The level of significance was stated at P \< 0.05. Receiver operating curves (ROC) were plotted and area under the curve (AUC) was assessed for some studied variables. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at a cutoff point. A p value of \<0.05 was considered significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

200 diabetic patients with indication for coronary intervention participated in the study. 100 patients were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin (80 mg) just before coronary intervention (statin group) and 100 patients received placebo (control group).
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Statin group

100 patients were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin (80 mg) just before coronary intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Atorvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients received 80 mg atorvastatin before elective coronary angiography

Placebo group

100 patients received placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Atorvastatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients received 80 mg atorvastatin before elective coronary angiography

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Atorvastatin

Patients received 80 mg atorvastatin before elective coronary angiography

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

statin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 200 diabetic patients with indication for coronary intervention participated in the study

Exclusion Criteria

1. Current statin treatment within the previous three months.
2. Chronic renal failure patients on renal dialysis, or serum creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl.
3. Severe co-morbidities i.e. patients with cancer, advanced liver cirrhosis.
4. Contraindications to statin therapy.
5. Contrast media injection within the preceding 10 days.
6. Pregnancy.
7. Refusal of consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mohamed Abdelfatah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Abdelfatah

investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ayman Ibrahem, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Assiut University

Ahmed Abdel-Galeel, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assiut University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assiut University

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mohammed NM, Mahfouz A, Achkar K, Rafie IM, Hajar R. Contrast-induced Nephropathy. Heart Views. 2013 Jul;14(3):106-16. doi: 10.4103/1995-705X.125926.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24696755 (View on PubMed)

Bolognese L, Falsini G, Schwenke C, Grotti S, Limbruno U, Liistro F, Carrera A, Angioli P, Picchi A, Ducci K, Pierli C. Impact of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast agents on contrast-induced nephropathy and tissue reperfusion in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Following Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction [CONTRAST-AMI] Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jan 1;109(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21943940 (View on PubMed)

Perrin T, Descombes E, Cook S. Contrast-induced nephropathy in invasive cardiology. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Jun 19;142:w13608. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13608. eCollection 2012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22714555 (View on PubMed)

McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, Davidson C, Lameire N, Stacul F, Tumlin J; CIN Consensus Working Panel. Epidemiology and prognostic implications of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 18;98(6A):5K-13K. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.019. Epub 2006 Feb 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16949375 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Atorvastatin in elective CA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.