Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Emergency Department Patients
NCT ID: NCT04374760
Last Updated: 2024-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1116 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-12-03
2024-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Promoting Cervical Cancer Screening for Emergency Department Patients
NCT03483610
Emergency Department-based Cervical Cancer Screening Through Self-sampling
NCT07345897
Advancing Cervical Cancer Screening Through the Emergency Department - IIS
NCT06796738
Conducting Outreach to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening Rates Among Underscreened Patients
NCT02427399
Cervical Cytology - Do SMS Reminders Increase Participation in the Cervical Screening Programme?
NCT03975127
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1: Compare CC screening uptake between SMS intervention and control groups. Hypothesis 1: Uptake of CC screening in the SMS intervention group will be greater than in the control group at 150-day follow-up.This aim will determine the efficacy of the intervention.
Aim 2: Compare the impact of in-person (using research staff) versus self-administered (using a tablet) determination of CC screening adherence on the efficacy of the intervention.
Hypothesis 2: The method of determining adherence will not impact the efficacy of the intervention. This aim will evaluate an approach to limit cost and increase the scalability of intervention implementation. Aim 3: Identify mediators and explore moderators of intervention effects on CC screening uptake at follow-up.
Hypothesis 3: Uptake in the intervention group will be mediated by theory-posited proximal predictors. This aim will elucidate the mechanism of behavioral change resulting from the intervention and identify differential effects among study sub-groups.
This project leverages the universal access setting of the ED to target women most at risk for non-adherence with CC screening guidelines. A low-cost, scalable intervention that increases CC screening uptake in this population would decrease CC incidence and save lives. Our next step would be a multi-site effectiveness trial using the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Network.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
in-person control
Usual care, initial screening measures conducted in-person in the Emergency Department.
No interventions assigned to this group
Self-Administered Control
Usual care, initial screening measures conducted on their own via an iPad.
No interventions assigned to this group
In-person Treatment
Treatment group (receives text messages), initial screening measures conducted in-person in the Emergency Department.
SMS-intervention
SMS-intervention consisting of a series of text messages, grounded in behavioral change theory, aimed at generating intention and autonomous motivation to get screened.
Self-Administered Treatment
Treatment group (receives text messages), initial screening measures conducted on their own via an iPad.
SMS-intervention
SMS-intervention consisting of a series of text messages, grounded in behavioral change theory, aimed at generating intention and autonomous motivation to get screened.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SMS-intervention
SMS-intervention consisting of a series of text messages, grounded in behavioral change theory, aimed at generating intention and autonomous motivation to get screened.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age 21 - 65 years
* demonstrating decisional capacity to consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria
* the absence of a cervix (i.e. in patient that is a transwoman
* known infection with HIV (as screening recommendations for women with HIV differ from the general population)
* inability to consent (e.g., lacking decisional capacity, intoxicated, or in distress)
* non-English/Spanish/American Sign Language (ASL) speaking (Spanish and ASL interpreter services are available 24/7 in our system and will be paid for through grant funds)
21 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
University of Rochester
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Adler
Director, Emergency Medicine Research; Professor of Emergency Medicine & Public Health Sciences
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Adler, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Rochester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nicolas Noyes Community Hospital
Dansville, New York, United States
Strong Memorial Hospital Emergency Department
Rochester, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00004765
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.