Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Emergency Department Patients

NCT ID: NCT04374760

Last Updated: 2024-04-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1116 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-03

Study Completion Date

2024-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Invasive cervical cancer is preventable with adequate screening but screening rates are considerably below national goals. Emergency departments care for a disproportionate number of women who are not up to date with recommended cervical cancer screening. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile technology based behavioral intervention (using text messaging prompts) to increase cervical cancer screening uptake among emergency department patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cervical cancer (CC) is preventable. Screening for CC aims to identify treatable lesions prior to the development of invasive CC which, without screening, is often first detected at a stage when comfort care is all that can be offered. Still, only 80% of U.S. women age 21 - 65 report adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) CC screening recommendations. This rate is considerably below the Healthy People 2020 target of 93%8. Lower rates of screening have been particularly pronounced among racial and ethnic minorities and patients with lower education levels. The group most likely to be non-adherent with screening guidelines is women who use the emergency department (ED) for their usual source of care. The ED setting, therefore, is optimal for the deployment of an intervention to promote CC screening. Although designed to address acute illnesses and injuries, the ED is an effective environment to advance preventive health. Numerous preventive health interventions have been successfully deployed in the ED including smoking cessation, HIV testing, and depression screening. Interventions delivered in the ED often suffer from lack of follow up and hence low adherence. Novel approaches are needed to reinforce health messages delivered in the acute context of the ED. Short Message Service (SMS) on mobile phones, also known as text messaging, is a low-cost, scalable, and effective means of delivering health behavior interventions. According to the Pew Research Center, the vast majority of Americans - 95% - own a cell phone, and an estimated 98% of all cell phones have texting capabilities. Evidence-based SMS interventions for health behavior include smoking cessation,primary care attendance, breast cancer screening, and sun safety, among others. However, minimal research has been conducted applying SMS interventions to CC screening and no prior research, apart from our pilot work, has targeted a CC prevention intervention by leveraging the universal healthcare access setting of the ED. In 2018-19 the investigators conducted a randomized clinical trial pilot (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03483610; NIH Grant ID: UL1TR002001) among ED patients non-adherent with USPSTF recommendations comparing an SMS intervention group to a referral-only control group to improve CC screening uptake at follow-up. The intervention consisted of a series of text messages, grounded in behavioral change theory, aimed at generating intention to get screened. The results of this pilot: (A) demonstrated the feasibility of our approach, (B) showed preliminary evidence of efficacy, and (C) provided an effect size estimate. Our overarching goal is to develop a low-cost, scalable SMS intervention that increases CC screening uptake among ED patients and can be deployed in heterogenous ED settings. The proposed randomized controlled trial will test the efficacy of this intervention. Step 1 of our approach is to identify whether the participant is adherent with screening guidelines. Step 2 is to randomize non-adherent participants to one of the two treatment conditions: (1) referral only (control) or, (2) referral and an SMS-intervention consisting of a series of text messages, grounded in behavioral change theory, aimed at generating intention and autonomous motivation to get screened. To limit costs and increase the scalability of the intervention, determination of adherence with screening guidelines via a self-administered questionnaire on a tablet computer will be evaluated. A total of 1,460 non-adherent women, age 21-65, will be recruited from a high-volume urban ED and a low-volume rural ED, randomized among study conditions, and followed-up at 150 days to assess interval CC screening uptake.

Aim 1: Compare CC screening uptake between SMS intervention and control groups. Hypothesis 1: Uptake of CC screening in the SMS intervention group will be greater than in the control group at 150-day follow-up.This aim will determine the efficacy of the intervention.

Aim 2: Compare the impact of in-person (using research staff) versus self-administered (using a tablet) determination of CC screening adherence on the efficacy of the intervention.

Hypothesis 2: The method of determining adherence will not impact the efficacy of the intervention. This aim will evaluate an approach to limit cost and increase the scalability of intervention implementation. Aim 3: Identify mediators and explore moderators of intervention effects on CC screening uptake at follow-up.

Hypothesis 3: Uptake in the intervention group will be mediated by theory-posited proximal predictors. This aim will elucidate the mechanism of behavioral change resulting from the intervention and identify differential effects among study sub-groups.

This project leverages the universal access setting of the ED to target women most at risk for non-adherence with CC screening guidelines. A low-cost, scalable intervention that increases CC screening uptake in this population would decrease CC incidence and save lives. Our next step would be a multi-site effectiveness trial using the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Network.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized controlled clinical trial with a prospectively collected convenience sample of 1,460 women nonadherent with CC screening guidelines. Women aged 21-65 will be recruited from a high-volume urban ED and a low-volume rural ED, assigned to study conditions, and followed-up at 150 days to assess interval uptake of CC screening (primary outcome). Electronic Health Record (EHR) review will be conducted to assess screening results and subsequent clinical endpoints. A two-step randomization process will be used to achieve a 2 x 2 factorial design.
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

in-person control

Usual care, initial screening measures conducted in-person in the Emergency Department.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Self-Administered Control

Usual care, initial screening measures conducted on their own via an iPad.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

In-person Treatment

Treatment group (receives text messages), initial screening measures conducted in-person in the Emergency Department.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SMS-intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

SMS-intervention consisting of a series of text messages, grounded in behavioral change theory, aimed at generating intention and autonomous motivation to get screened.

Self-Administered Treatment

Treatment group (receives text messages), initial screening measures conducted on their own via an iPad.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SMS-intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

SMS-intervention consisting of a series of text messages, grounded in behavioral change theory, aimed at generating intention and autonomous motivation to get screened.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SMS-intervention

SMS-intervention consisting of a series of text messages, grounded in behavioral change theory, aimed at generating intention and autonomous motivation to get screened.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* female
* age 21 - 65 years
* demonstrating decisional capacity to consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria

* past hysterectomy with cervical removal
* the absence of a cervix (i.e. in patient that is a transwoman
* known infection with HIV (as screening recommendations for women with HIV differ from the general population)
* inability to consent (e.g., lacking decisional capacity, intoxicated, or in distress)
* non-English/Spanish/American Sign Language (ASL) speaking (Spanish and ASL interpreter services are available 24/7 in our system and will be paid for through grant funds)
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Rochester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Adler

Director, Emergency Medicine Research; Professor of Emergency Medicine & Public Health Sciences

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Adler, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Rochester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nicolas Noyes Community Hospital

Dansville, New York, United States

Site Status

Strong Memorial Hospital Emergency Department

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01CA246626

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY00004765

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.