Effect of QMix 2in1 as Final Irrigation Protocol on Periapical Healing
NCT ID: NCT04348578
Last Updated: 2020-04-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-01
2019-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methodology: The study included 60 single-rooted teeth with periapical radiolucency of 60 patients, randomized into two groups using randomized block design with block sizes of 10 patients in each. Root canals were prepared with WaveOne Gold files (Dentsply Sirona, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and irrigation was performed with 5 mL 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) using side-vented needles during instrumentation. The final irrigation protocol was performed using 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl (n= 30) or 5 ml QMix 2-in-1 (n=30). Then the root canals were irrigated with 5 mL of distilled water and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Sirona), using the cold lateral compaction technique. The patients were recalled after 12 months and evaluated radiographically according to perapical index (PAI) scores. Pre and post-treatment PAI scores were compared and teeth were considered 'healthy' (PAI ≤ 2) or 'diseased' (PAI ≥ 3). The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between the post-operative and follow-up images of the treatment groups. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied to examine the changes in PAI score from baseline to the follow-up evaluation in each group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing the Effect of Different Intracanal Dressing on Failed Root Canal Treated Cases on Periapical Healing
NCT06342830
Effect of Different Root Canal Sealers on Postoperative Pain
NCT06726837
Lesion Healing After Regenerative Endodontic Treatment
NCT06843850
Effects of Irrigation Activation on Clinical Outcomes of Root Canal Treatment
NCT03990584
Comparative Analysis of Photodynamic Therapy on Periapical Healing
NCT06553144
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control group
The root canal was prepared using the WaveOne Gold file reciprocation system with VDW Silver motor. WaveOne Gold #25 (0.07) file was used for instrumentation. For larger canals, #35 (0.06) and #45 (0.05) files were used after the #25 file. During instrumentation procedure, irrigation was applied with 5mL 2.5% NaOCl using a side-vented needles. The final irrigation was applied with 5mL NaOCl and 5mL sterile saline in the control group.The root canals were dried with sterile paper points and were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer with the cold lateral condensation method and the entry cavity was restored with composite. All treatments were performed following a standardized procedure by one operator. After completion of the root canal treatment, periapical radiographs were taken using the paralleling technique. All the patients were called for follow-up examination at 12 months, and were examined radiographically.
No interventions assigned to this group
QMix 2in1
The root canal was prepared using the WaveOne Gold file reciprocation system with VDW Silver motor. WaveOne Gold #25 (0.07) file was used for instrumentation. For larger canals, #35 (0.06) and #45 (0.05) files were used after the #25 file. During instrumentation procedure, irrigation was applied with 5mL 2.5% NaOCl using a side-vented needles. The final irrigation was applied with 5mL Mix 2in1 and 5mL sterile saline in the experimental group.
QMix 2in1
In QMix 2in1 group root canals were irrigated with Mix as a final irrigation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
QMix 2in1
In QMix 2in1 group root canals were irrigated with Mix as a final irrigation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* had used antibiotics within the previous week
* allergy to local anesthetic agents
* history of intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
* had uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, hematological disease, or had received or were receiving radiotherapy and periodontal bone loss (visualized radiographically)
* open tooth apex
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cukurova University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cemre Sapmaz Uçan
Research Asistant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Oguz Yoldaş, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Cukurova, Faculty of Dentistry, Vice-Dean
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cukurova University, Faculty of Dentistry
Adana, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abbaszadegan A, Nabavizadeh M, Hoseini Yekani A, Khayat A. Comparison of Endodontic Treatment Results Yielded from Using Normal Saline with IKI Final Rinse or NaOCl Irrigation: A 30-Month Follow-up Study. Iran Endod J. 2013 Fall;8(4):171-6. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
Holland R, Gomes JE Filho, Cintra LTA, Queiroz IOA, Estrela C. Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(5):465-476. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464.
Paredes-Vieyra J, Enriquez FJ. Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
Pai S, Thomas MS. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris. J Endod. 2011 Jun;37(6):741; author reply 741-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 6. No abstract available.
Chandrasekhar V, Amulya V, Rani VS, Prakash TJ, Ranjani AS, Gayathri Ch. Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix 2 in 1- An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jan;16(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.105296.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TDH-2017-8165
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.