Effect of QMix 2in1 as Final Irrigation Protocol on Periapical Healing

NCT ID: NCT04348578

Last Updated: 2020-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-01

Study Completion Date

2019-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim: To compare the 12-month radiographic outcome of root canal treatment with and without the additional use of QMix 2-in-1 (Dentsply Tulsa, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) irrigation solution.

Methodology: The study included 60 single-rooted teeth with periapical radiolucency of 60 patients, randomized into two groups using randomized block design with block sizes of 10 patients in each. Root canals were prepared with WaveOne Gold files (Dentsply Sirona, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and irrigation was performed with 5 mL 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) using side-vented needles during instrumentation. The final irrigation protocol was performed using 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl (n= 30) or 5 ml QMix 2-in-1 (n=30). Then the root canals were irrigated with 5 mL of distilled water and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Sirona), using the cold lateral compaction technique. The patients were recalled after 12 months and evaluated radiographically according to perapical index (PAI) scores. Pre and post-treatment PAI scores were compared and teeth were considered 'healthy' (PAI ≤ 2) or 'diseased' (PAI ≥ 3). The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between the post-operative and follow-up images of the treatment groups. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied to examine the changes in PAI score from baseline to the follow-up evaluation in each group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate radiographic periapical repair after endodontic treatment using QMix 2-in-1 (Dentsply Tulsa, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and NaOCl irrigation in single-rooted teeth with apical periodontitis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periapical Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group

The root canal was prepared using the WaveOne Gold file reciprocation system with VDW Silver motor. WaveOne Gold #25 (0.07) file was used for instrumentation. For larger canals, #35 (0.06) and #45 (0.05) files were used after the #25 file. During instrumentation procedure, irrigation was applied with 5mL 2.5% NaOCl using a side-vented needles. The final irrigation was applied with 5mL NaOCl and 5mL sterile saline in the control group.The root canals were dried with sterile paper points and were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer with the cold lateral condensation method and the entry cavity was restored with composite. All treatments were performed following a standardized procedure by one operator. After completion of the root canal treatment, periapical radiographs were taken using the paralleling technique. All the patients were called for follow-up examination at 12 months, and were examined radiographically.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

QMix 2in1

The root canal was prepared using the WaveOne Gold file reciprocation system with VDW Silver motor. WaveOne Gold #25 (0.07) file was used for instrumentation. For larger canals, #35 (0.06) and #45 (0.05) files were used after the #25 file. During instrumentation procedure, irrigation was applied with 5mL 2.5% NaOCl using a side-vented needles. The final irrigation was applied with 5mL Mix 2in1 and 5mL sterile saline in the experimental group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

QMix 2in1

Intervention Type OTHER

In QMix 2in1 group root canals were irrigated with Mix as a final irrigation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

QMix 2in1

In QMix 2in1 group root canals were irrigated with Mix as a final irrigation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* necrotic, single root teeth with a periapical lesion (2\>PAI\>5)

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnant
* had used antibiotics within the previous week
* allergy to local anesthetic agents
* history of intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
* had uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, hematological disease, or had received or were receiving radiotherapy and periodontal bone loss (visualized radiographically)
* open tooth apex
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cukurova University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cemre Sapmaz Uçan

Research Asistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oguz Yoldaş, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Cukurova, Faculty of Dentistry, Vice-Dean

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cukurova University, Faculty of Dentistry

Adana, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abbaszadegan A, Nabavizadeh M, Hoseini Yekani A, Khayat A. Comparison of Endodontic Treatment Results Yielded from Using Normal Saline with IKI Final Rinse or NaOCl Irrigation: A 30-Month Follow-up Study. Iran Endod J. 2013 Fall;8(4):171-6. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24171024 (View on PubMed)

Holland R, Gomes JE Filho, Cintra LTA, Queiroz IOA, Estrela C. Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(5):465-476. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29069143 (View on PubMed)

Paredes-Vieyra J, Enriquez FJ. Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22892729 (View on PubMed)

Pai S, Thomas MS. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris. J Endod. 2011 Jun;37(6):741; author reply 741-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 6. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21787479 (View on PubMed)

Chandrasekhar V, Amulya V, Rani VS, Prakash TJ, Ranjani AS, Gayathri Ch. Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix 2 in 1- An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jan;16(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.105296.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23349574 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TDH-2017-8165

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clinical Efficacy of AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer
NCT05763420 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA