Effect of Undersized Drilling Upon the Immediate Implants
NCT ID: NCT04345133
Last Updated: 2020-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-09
2018-03-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
evaluate the effect of undersized drilling upon the primary and secondary stability of immediate implants placed in the anterior sector maxilla.
PATIENTS AND METHODS Study design A randomized comparative clinical trial was carried out. Thirty conical MIS C1 grade 23 titanium alloy (Ti 6Al 4V Eli) implants with a rough surface subjected to dual acid etching and sandblasting, measuring 3.75 mm in maximum diameter and 13 mm in length (MIS® Implants Technologies, Ltd. Bar Levi, Israel), were placed immediately after removal a anterior maxillary tooth in a series of patients treated in the clinic of the Master of Dentistry and Dental Implantology (Santa María University, Dental School, Caracas, Venezuela). The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee.
Patient selection To enrolled in the study, patients had to comply the inclusion/exclusion criteria established to the study: over 18 years of age with indication of one or more immediate implants in the anterior maxilla; no history of ischemic heart disease, uncontrolled diabetes, coagulation disorders, head or neck radiotherapy, intravenous bisphosphonates or uncontrolled periodontal disease. Based on a CTCB evaluation, the teeth involved should have presence of bone ≥ 5 mm from the tooth apex to the lower cortical layer of the nasal fossa / maxillary sinus and no vertical defects greater than 4 mm at the buccal or palatine alveolar crest. Also, patients must have capacity to understand the study protocol and fill consent form to participation in the study.
Study procedure Two operators calibrated for immediate implant placement performed minimally traumatic tooth extraction following local infiltrating anesthesia with 4% articaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine (Artheek® 4%, New Stetic S.A.; Antioquia, Colombia). After evaluating the integrity of the bone walls, drilling sequence was established on a randomized basis.
Conventional drilling (CD) sequence:
* Marking drill ∅1.9 mm at 1500 rpm
* Pilot drill ∅ 2.4 mm and 13 mm in length at 800 rpm.
* Twist drill ∅3 mm at 400 rpm.
Undersized drilling (UD) sequence:
Marking drill ∅1.9 mm at 1500 rpm Pilot drill ∅ 2.4 mm and 13 mm in length at 400 rpm. Implant insertion A surgical motor (MCU MIS, model M0132, W\&H, Burmoos, Austria) with a 20:1 reducing implant handpiece was used to insert the implants at 20 rpm and applying a torque of 10 Ncm. Following placement of the implant in the bed, manual insertion was continued to reach the final implant position, established as 4 mm from the gingival margin.
Study variables Two torque meters (MIS® Implants LTD, models MT-RI040 and MT-RT070, Bar Levi, Israel) were used to insert and sequentially measure the maximum IT reached on positioning the implant in the socket. A Smart-peg Nro 49 model 100480 was fitted to the connection of each implant and an Osstell ISQ® (SN 4669 Osstell AB, Goteborg, Sweden) was used to perform RFA analysis and obtain corresponding ISQ value at insertion time (RFA1). A 4 mm height healing screw was used to seal the implant, and then additional RFA measurements was made at 6 week (RFA2) and 12 week (RFA3) post-implantation
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Implant Insertion Torque and Primary Stability
NCT03222219
Immediate Implants in the Aesthetic Zone
NCT04343833
Influence of the Implant-prosthetic Connection in the Marginal Bone Loss and Bacterial Leakage
NCT04328051
Dimensional Changes in Single Crowns Supported by Short Transmucosal Implants With Diverging or Converging Neck Profiles in the Esthetic Zone
NCT06006156
Clinical Evaluation Of Dental Implants Stability Placed In Healed Bony Sites Following Over-drilling Compared To Conventional-Drilling Protocol
NCT03250949
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Undersized Drilling Group
Exposed patients to the reduction of the final drill dimensions at the insertion implants protocol sequence
Dental Implants Insertion Drilling Sequence
Drilling sequence protocol to insert immediate Dental Implants at the Maxilla.
Conventional Drilling Group
Group with the conventional protocol recommended by the manufacturer
Dental Implants Insertion Drilling Sequence
Drilling sequence protocol to insert immediate Dental Implants at the Maxilla.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental Implants Insertion Drilling Sequence
Drilling sequence protocol to insert immediate Dental Implants at the Maxilla.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Carabobo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alejandro Sierra-Rebolledo
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alejandro Sierra-Rebolledo, DDS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Carabobo, Faculty of Dentistry
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sierra-Rebolledo A, Allais-Leon M, Maurette-O'Brien P, Gay-Escoda C. Primary Apical Stability of Tapered Implants Through Reduction of Final Drilling Dimensions in Different Bone Density Models: A Biomechanical Study. Implant Dent. 2016 Dec;25(6):775-782. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000479.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UCarabobo
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.