Effect of Undersized Drilling Upon the Immediate Implants

NCT ID: NCT04345133

Last Updated: 2020-04-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-09

Study Completion Date

2018-03-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

OBJECTIVE:

evaluate the effect of undersized drilling upon the primary and secondary stability of immediate implants placed in the anterior sector maxilla.

PATIENTS AND METHODS Study design A randomized comparative clinical trial was carried out. Thirty conical MIS C1 grade 23 titanium alloy (Ti 6Al 4V Eli) implants with a rough surface subjected to dual acid etching and sandblasting, measuring 3.75 mm in maximum diameter and 13 mm in length (MIS® Implants Technologies, Ltd. Bar Levi, Israel), were placed immediately after removal a anterior maxillary tooth in a series of patients treated in the clinic of the Master of Dentistry and Dental Implantology (Santa María University, Dental School, Caracas, Venezuela). The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee.

Patient selection To enrolled in the study, patients had to comply the inclusion/exclusion criteria established to the study: over 18 years of age with indication of one or more immediate implants in the anterior maxilla; no history of ischemic heart disease, uncontrolled diabetes, coagulation disorders, head or neck radiotherapy, intravenous bisphosphonates or uncontrolled periodontal disease. Based on a CTCB evaluation, the teeth involved should have presence of bone ≥ 5 mm from the tooth apex to the lower cortical layer of the nasal fossa / maxillary sinus and no vertical defects greater than 4 mm at the buccal or palatine alveolar crest. Also, patients must have capacity to understand the study protocol and fill consent form to participation in the study.

Study procedure Two operators calibrated for immediate implant placement performed minimally traumatic tooth extraction following local infiltrating anesthesia with 4% articaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine (Artheek® 4%, New Stetic S.A.; Antioquia, Colombia). After evaluating the integrity of the bone walls, drilling sequence was established on a randomized basis.

Conventional drilling (CD) sequence:

* Marking drill ∅1.9 mm at 1500 rpm
* Pilot drill ∅ 2.4 mm and 13 mm in length at 800 rpm.
* Twist drill ∅3 mm at 400 rpm.

Undersized drilling (UD) sequence:

Marking drill ∅1.9 mm at 1500 rpm Pilot drill ∅ 2.4 mm and 13 mm in length at 400 rpm. Implant insertion A surgical motor (MCU MIS, model M0132, W\&H, Burmoos, Austria) with a 20:1 reducing implant handpiece was used to insert the implants at 20 rpm and applying a torque of 10 Ncm. Following placement of the implant in the bed, manual insertion was continued to reach the final implant position, established as 4 mm from the gingival margin.

Study variables Two torque meters (MIS® Implants LTD, models MT-RI040 and MT-RT070, Bar Levi, Israel) were used to insert and sequentially measure the maximum IT reached on positioning the implant in the socket. A Smart-peg Nro 49 model 100480 was fitted to the connection of each implant and an Osstell ISQ® (SN 4669 Osstell AB, Goteborg, Sweden) was used to perform RFA analysis and obtain corresponding ISQ value at insertion time (RFA1). A 4 mm height healing screw was used to seal the implant, and then additional RFA measurements was made at 6 week (RFA2) and 12 week (RFA3) post-implantation

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Implant Stability

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Comparative
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
No informaron about sequence of drilling was used to insert the implants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Undersized Drilling Group

Exposed patients to the reduction of the final drill dimensions at the insertion implants protocol sequence

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dental Implants Insertion Drilling Sequence

Intervention Type DEVICE

Drilling sequence protocol to insert immediate Dental Implants at the Maxilla.

Conventional Drilling Group

Group with the conventional protocol recommended by the manufacturer

Group Type OTHER

Dental Implants Insertion Drilling Sequence

Intervention Type DEVICE

Drilling sequence protocol to insert immediate Dental Implants at the Maxilla.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dental Implants Insertion Drilling Sequence

Drilling sequence protocol to insert immediate Dental Implants at the Maxilla.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

indication of one or more immediate implants in the anterior maxilla; No history of ischemic heart disease, No History of uncontrolled diabetes, No coagulation disorders, No head or neck radiotherapy

Exclusion Criteria

Periodontal Disease. History of EV or Oral Bisphosphonate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Carabobo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alejandro Sierra-Rebolledo

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alejandro Sierra-Rebolledo, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Carabobo, Faculty of Dentistry

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sierra-Rebolledo A, Allais-Leon M, Maurette-O'Brien P, Gay-Escoda C. Primary Apical Stability of Tapered Implants Through Reduction of Final Drilling Dimensions in Different Bone Density Models: A Biomechanical Study. Implant Dent. 2016 Dec;25(6):775-782. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000479.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27540846 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UCarabobo

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Osteoimplant and Dental Implants Stability
NCT06657521 NOT_YET_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1