Comparison of Yttrium-90 Absorbed Doses Using PET/CT Versus PET/MR Imaging for Hepatic Malignancies
NCT ID: NCT04332419
Last Updated: 2022-06-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
11 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-03
2020-09-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Follow-up Yttrium-90 Internal Pair Production PET/CT vs Brehmsstrahlung Imaging in Patients With Primary/Metastatic Liver Tumors
NCT02202317
Yttrium-90 (Y90) Glass Microspheres PET/CT in Imaging Patients With Liver Tumors
NCT03109262
Pilot Study to Assess Lung Shunting of Yttrium-90 Microspheres Using PET/CT
NCT02119065
Pair Production PET Imaging to Detect Particle Distribution in Patients Undergoing Yttrium-90 Radioembolization
NCT02848638
Enhancing SUV Accuracy of PET/MR for Clinical Trial Qualification
NCT03603925
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the agreement between post-Y-90 RE absorbed doses (Gy) in the liver tumor tissues based on PET/CT versus PET/MR imaging. This would permit the comparison of Y-90 tumor absorbed doses, acquired from PET/MR, with the current standard of care PET/CT imaging to verify the data consistency and to validate its application for the prediction of tumor response to treatment.
The secondary objective of this study is to assess the agreement between post-Y-90 RE absorbed doses (Gy) in the background liver tissues (surrounding tumors), based on PET/CT versus PET/MR imaging. This would permit the comparison of Y-90 background liver absorbed doses, acquired from PET/MR, with the current standard of care PET/CT imaging to verify the data consistency and to validate its application for the prediction of dose toxicity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PET/CT & PET/MR
One-time PET/MR imaging in addition to the standard PET/CT imaging, both performed on the same day of the treatment procedure (Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Y-90 RE). Participants will be randomized to receive either of the imaging modalities first, based on the availability of the imaging device, and less than 1 hour apart.
PET/CT
Standard Imaging
PET/MR
Additional Imaging
SIRT with Y-90
SIRT with Y-90 for palliative treatment of the liver malignancy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PET/CT
Standard Imaging
PET/MR
Additional Imaging
SIRT with Y-90
SIRT with Y-90 for palliative treatment of the liver malignancy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient is an adult, self-competent, and able to provide informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* The patient is not eligible to undergo MRI due to the presence of metal devices or implants in their body; OR
* Both imaging modalities cannot take place within 6 hours after Y-90 RE; OR
* Both imaging modalities cannot take place within 1 hour apart from each other
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ram Gurajala, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CASE13219
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.