Inhaled Methoxyflurane for Pain Management in Nasal Bone Fracture Reduction
NCT ID: NCT04332159
Last Updated: 2020-04-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-10
2021-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study aims to provide evidence under blinded controlled conditions that Penthrox is safe and effective in patients aged 18 to 65 years during closed nasal fracture reduction.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Methoxyflurane (Penthrox) for the Treatment of Acute Pain in Minor Trauma
NCT01420159
Low Dose Methoxyflurane for Pain Relief During Minor Out-patient Urologic Procedures
NCT04412642
Use of Methoxyflurane (Penthrox) as an Antalgic in Hospital Trauma
NCT03927729
Safety and Efficacy of Methoxyflurane for Treatment of Incident Pain
NCT00524927
Narcotic Versus Non-narcotic Medication for Pain Management After Wrist/Hand Fractures
NCT03375593
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The secondary outcomes consist of assessing if inclusion of Methoxyflurane will have a positive impact on the time needed to achieve the reduction, the need for backup analgesia, the rate of reduction failure, pain level during infiltration of local anesthesia and the clinician's appreciation of the procedure.
As an hypothesis, the investigators expect that the addition of Methoxyflurane to the standard local anesthesia will significantly reduce the pain compared to local anesthesia with placebo during closed nasal fracture reduction. The investigators also think that Methoxyflurane might reduce the duration of the reduction, limit the need for backup analgesia, reduce the rate of reduction failure, reduce the pain level due to infiltration of local anesthesia and facilitate the procedure for the clinician.
To reach these objectives, the investigators propose a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on a sample of patients randomized in two different groups:
* Group A (intervention) : Closed nasal fracture reduction under local anesthesia and inhaled Methoxyflurane.
* Group B (control) : Closed nasal fracture reduction under local anesthesia and placebo.
The placebo in this study is a 0,9% saline solution that will come in an identical Penthrox inhaler. The inhaler will be prepared by a pharmacy technician experienced in double-blind research right before its use. The characteristic smell of the Methoxyflurane solution will be reproduced by pouring a few drops of Methoxyflurane just above the tip of the inhaler. N95 masks will be worn by the clinician and research nurse throughout the procedure to lower the risk of group identification.
PROCEDURE Patient referred to the investigators outpatient clinic for nasal fracture 7 to 10 days from the trauma date will be evaluated by one of the investigator and the need for intervention will be established.
Eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to have 17 patients per treatment arm (an interim analysis will be done after 10 patients per treatment arm). Eligible patients will receive either methoxyflurane or placebo from the PENTHROX® inhaler in a 1:1 ratio.
Before the procedure, the patient will assess his current level of pain on the visual analog scale (baseline pain). The patient will then self-administer 6 to 10 successive inhalations of Penthrox or placebo (assisted by the research nurse). The clinician will then wait 5 minutes before proceeding with local anesthesia as follow :
1. Two sprays of 4% lidocaine in each nostril.
2. Bilateral infratrochlear block with local 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100000 (approximately 0.5 cc on each side). This will be done carefully to ensure that anatomical landmarks are preserved in order to obtain a proper reduction. (Infiltration of the skin on the lateral walls of the nose right above the proper nasal bone)
3. Bilateral infra-orbital block through the buccal mucosa using local 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100 000 (approximately 1.5 cc on each side)
4. Efficacy of the local lidocaine is evaluated and additional infiltration will be done when needed.
5. Packing of the nose with cotton balls soaked with 10 cc of a ½ lidocaine- ½ oxymetazoline solution. (4% lidocaine)
The patient will use the inhaler one more after local anesthesia and the investigator will wait 5 minutes prior to proceeding with the closed reduction to ensure an adequate efficacy of the topical lidocaine-oxymetazoline anesthesia.
The cotton balls will then be removed and the clinician will proceed with the closed reduction.
The research nurse then documents the time at which the reduction begins. A scalpel handle is placed against the external nose to measure the distance from the medial canthus to the nostril rim. The scalpel handle is inserted between the depressed nasal bone and the the nasal septum, parallel to the nasal dorsum. The depressed bone is pulled laterally and guided into a neutral position with the scalpel handle while direct pressure is applied medially on the contralateral nasal bone (the laterally deviated side) in order to push it back into its neutral position. If needed, centrally depressed fragments require an anterior lifting motion with the elevator. These steps are repeated until the patient and the clinician are satisfied with the aesthetic result or if the patient asks the clinician to stop the procedure. End time of the procedure will also be noted.
The patient can ask for additional Methoxyflurane inhalations at anytime during the procedure. The patient is provided with 3 mL bottle of Methoxyflurane (or placebo) and cannot ask for another one. If during the procedure the patient asks for additional analgesia, his nose will be packed with cotton balls soaked in lidocaine-oxymetazoline for 5 minutes. However, if despite additional analgesia the procedure is interrupted because it is too painful for the patient, it will be considered as a reduction failure due to pain (whether the procedure is carried out under systemic analgesia, sedation or is abandoned). In the event of failure to achieve adequate fracture reduction, sedation and/or general anesthesia will be offered to the patient to complete the reduction.
After the procedure, pain levels (during infiltration of local anesthesia, mean and peak pain during the reduction) will be reported on the visual analog scale.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
* Group A (intervention) : Closed nasal fracture reduction under local anesthesia and inhaled Methoxyflurane.
* Group B (control) : Closed nasal fracture reduction under local anesthesia and placebo.
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
Inhalation of Methoxyflurane through a Penthrox inhaler
Closed nasal fracture reduction
Closed nasal fracture reduction is performed under local anesthesia with addition of Methoxyflurane or placebo
Control group
Inhalation of placebo (0.9% salin solution) through a Penthrox inhaler
Closed nasal fracture reduction
Closed nasal fracture reduction is performed under local anesthesia with addition of Methoxyflurane or placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Closed nasal fracture reduction
Closed nasal fracture reduction is performed under local anesthesia with addition of Methoxyflurane or placebo
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Being covered by the Quebec medical insurance (RAMQ); and
* Presenting an uncomplicated nasal fracture requiring a delayed (7 to 10 days) closed reduction.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known for renal insufficiency (DFG \< 50) ; or
* Known for hepatic impairment; or
* Personal or familial allergies/hypersensitivity to fluorinated products; or
* Contraindications to local anesthesia (including allergies); or
* Personal or family history of malignant hyperthermia; or
* Other facial fractures and/or significant injuries; or
* Altered state of consciousness (dementia, drug intoxication, head trauma or other similar psychologic disorder); or
* Significant respiratory impairment; or
* Haemodynamic instability; or
* Simultaneous use of alcohol, isoniazid, phenobarbital, rifampin, opioids, sedatives, hypnotics, sedative antihistaminics, general anesthetics, phenothiazines, tranquilizers, myorelaxants, nephrotoxic antibiotics (tetracycline, gentamicin, colistine, polymyxin B, amphotericin B); or
* Use of cannabis or other illicit drugs the day of the procedure; or
* Use of pain medication in past 6 hours; or
* Use of Methoxyflurane : more than 6 mL in the last 48 hours or more than 15 mL in the last week or usage in the last 3 months; or
* Need of sedation or general anesthesia for the procedure.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Université de Sherbrooke
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pierre-Hugues Fortier
M.D., Clinical professor, Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CIUSSS de l'Estrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CÉR 2020-3355
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.