Efficacy of Clarithromycin-Naproxen-Oseltamivir Combination Therapy vs. Oseltamivir Alone for Hospitalised Paediatric Influenza Patients

NCT ID: NCT04315194

Last Updated: 2020-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-18

Study Completion Date

2019-12-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Efficacy of clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir combination therapy vs. oseltamivir alone for hospitalised paediatric influenza patients

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir combination therapy to that of oseltamivir treatment alone for hospitalised paediatric influenza patients. This prospective, single-blinded study included patients hospitalised for influenza infection aged 1 year to 18 years, at MacKay Children's Hospital, Taiwan, between December 2017 and December 2019. The primary outcomes were respiratory symptom severity and the signs that presented within hospitalisation. The durations of fever and hospital stay were also documented. The secondary outcome measures were serial changes in the virus titres, as detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Totally 54 patients were enrolled (28 in the control group and 26 in the combination group). There were no differences in the patients' baseline characteristics between the groups. The time to defervescence was significantly shorter in the combination group than the oseltamivir group (13.2 hours vs 32.1 hours, p=0.002). The decrease in the virus titre was more pronounced from days 1 to 3 (log Δ13) in the combination group than the oseltamivir group.(log Δ13: 39% vs 19%, p=0.001). In paediatric settings, combination therapy may be used selectively among patients with a history of febrile convulsion or families anxious about the discomforts associated with the fever itself.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Efficacy of Clarithromycin-Naproxen-Oseltamivir Combination Therapy vs. Oseltamivir Alone for Hospitalised Paediatric Influenza Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir

Efficacy of clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir combination therapy vs. oseltamivir alone for hospitalised paediatric influenza patients

clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir

Intervention Type DRUG

to compare the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir combination therapy to that of oseltamivir treatment alone for hospitalised paediatric influenza patients.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir

to compare the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir combination therapy to that of oseltamivir treatment alone for hospitalised paediatric influenza patients.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- age 1 year to 18 years; body temperature higher than 38 °C; presence of one of the following symptoms-cough, sputum production, sore throat, rhinorrhoea, myalgia, headache, or fatigue presenting within 72 hours from symptom onset; laboratory-confirmed influenza infection (including rapid test or PCR-confirmed influenza A or B); and clinical requirement for hospitalisation. Antiviral treatment was initiated within 48 hours after admission.

Exclusion Criteria

\- a history of allergy or contraindication to the study medications; the administration of medications with macrolides (ex: azithromycin, erythromycin), naproxen or neuraminidase inhibitor use within 72 hours; current use of any antibiotic; and the presence of an immunocompromised state due to steroid use, human immunodeficiency virus infection, chronic kidney disease, renal failure, chemotherapy or radiotherapy in half year, or innate immunodeficiency.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mackay Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chien-Wei Lee, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mackay Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mackay Children's Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MackayMH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.