DuraMesh Laparotomy Closure Following Trauma and Emergency Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04312165

Last Updated: 2023-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-31

Study Completion Date

2025-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The proposed project aims to evaluate the safety of DuraMesh™ suture for laparotomy closure in an emergent setting, while also providing preliminary efficacy data with regard to incisional hernia prevention. Conventional techniques for laparotomy closure in the setting of an emergency laparotomy or delayed abdominal closure suffer from a lack of durability, with incisional hernia rates of 30-34% reported. While prophylactic planar mesh placement has emerged as a cost-effective strategy to prevent hernia formation in the clean, elective laparotomy setting, higher rates of surgical site complications and increased technical complexity preclude its use in the emergency or contaminated setting. Utilized exactly like conventional suture without any change in surgical closure technique, DuraMesh™ provides the durability of planar mesh reinforcement without the marked increase in foreign material or added surgical complexity. As a result, DuraMesh™ is the only hernia prevention strategy that can be forward-deployed in support of the injured warfighter. While this study is specifically targeted to a gap in the care of the injured warfighter, the potential benefits extend well beyond the military applications. With over 2 million laparotomies performed annually in the United States, and approximately 20% of these resulting in an incisional hernia, the need for an alternative abdominal wall closure strategy is equally dire in the civilian setting. This clinical trial represents an opportunity to drive the needed paradigm shift towards prevention, rather than costly management of incisional hernias. The investigators anticipate this work will rapidly lead to further research, including providing the preliminary data necessary to launch a multi-center randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical efficacy of DuraMesh™ for hernia prevention in both the emergent and elective operative settings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a multisite randomized control proof-of-concept trial to evaluate the safety of DuraMesh™ laparotomy closure in the trauma and emergency laparotomy setting. Approximately 120 patients will be randomized (2:1) to DuraMesh™ laparotomy closure versus conventional suture closure. #1 DuraMesh™ will be provided for patients assigned to the DuraMesh™ treatment arm. Patients will participate in a one-year follow-up regime (2 weeks,1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months).

Primary Laparotomy Closure Treatment 1) Study Group - DuraMesh™ Laparotomy Closure (DLC) Treatment 2) Control Group - Conventional Suture Closure (CSC)

Patients undergoing a midline laparotomy for trauma or emergency surgery will be randomized to either #1 DuraMesh™ suture or conventional laparotomy closure using size #1 slowly-absorbing (PDS) single strand or looped suture, based on surgeon preference. All patients will be assessed for post-operative complications at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients will also be assessed for incisional hernia formation at the same post-operative time points (2 weeks,1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months). Hernia outcomes will be based on physical examination, with ultrasound used for any uncertainties.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernia Incisional Suture, Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

2:1 randomization between Duramesh closure and standard suture closure
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Duramesh Laparotomy Closure

Patients undergoing a midline laparotomy for trauma or emergency surgery will be randomized to either #1 Duramesh suture or standard suture, which is a #1 slowly-absorbing PDS single strand or looped suture based on surgeon preference.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Duramesh Laparotomy Closure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Closure of midline laparotomy incision with experimental suture

Control group-Conventional suture closure

Patients undergoing a midline laparotomy for trauma or emergency surgery will be randomized to either #1 Duramesh suture or standard suture, which is a #1 slowly-absorbing PDS single strand or looped suture based on surgeon preference.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional suture closure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Closure of midline laparotomy incision with standard suture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Duramesh Laparotomy Closure

Closure of midline laparotomy incision with experimental suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional suture closure

Closure of midline laparotomy incision with standard suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

mesh suture polydiaxanone PDS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Midline laparotomy 5 cm (2 inches) long
* Urgent or emergent surgery following trauma
* Urgent or emergent surgery for diverticulitis
* Urgent or emergent surgery for large or small bowel obstruction
* Urgent or emergent surgery for exploratory laparotomy for acute abdomen
* Urgent or emergent surgery for exploratory laparotomy for intraabdominal hemorrhage

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent
* Prior Hernia repair or existing ventral hernia mesh EXCLUDING inguinal hernias
* Metastatic cancer
* Pregnancy
* Immunosuppression
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gregory Dumanian

LCDR, Staff Surgeon Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Maryland Shock Trauma

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HP-00083440

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.