A Treatment Study Protocol for Participants 0-45 Years With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
NCT ID: NCT04307576
Last Updated: 2025-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
6430 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-07-13
2033-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Treatment Protocol for Participants 0-45 Years With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
NCT03911128
Treatment of Older Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
NCT00973752
Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in Younger Adults
NCT00327678
Treatment Protocol for Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia - AIEOP-BFM ALL 2017
NCT03643276
Applying Pediatric Regimens to Younger Adult Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
NCT00131053
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study groups from Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Denmark, Finland, Estonia and Lithuania (NOPHO), the UK (UKALL), the Netherlands (DCOG), Germany (COALL), Belgium (BSPHO), Portugal (SHOP), Ireland (PHOAI), and France (SFCE), have designed a common treatment protocol.
The study has a complex clinical trial design with sub-protocols (the randomisations / intervention) connected to a master protocol. The master protocol consists of well established therapy-elements and in its design typical for current ALL therapy. The master protocol therapy is in the study design considered as standard of care (SOC) therapy for infants, children and young adults with ALL.
The study structure is defined by a master protocol onto which randomised and interventional sub-protocols as well as sub-studies may be added, run and stop in a modular fashion.
The randomisations / intervention may identify therapy that is less toxic, but equally efficacious for sub-groups of patients and innovative therapy that may reduce relapses and death from ALL. In the master protocol, improved risk-stratification is likely to increase survival and reduce unnecessary toxicity and the introduction of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Asparaginase activity will make the use of Asparaginase more rational and efficient and may thus improve overall outcomes.
The investigators hypothesise that patients stratified to the standard-risk group are over-treated. Therefore, it will be tested if the treatment can be safely reduced. In the R1 randomisation, patients will be randomised to receiving the Delayed Intensification (DI) phase of therapy with or without the anthracycline Doxorubicin.
A similar hypothesis of over-treatment will also be tested in patients stratified to the intermediate risk-low group. In the R2 randomisation patients will be randomly assigned to either removal of Doxorubicin during the DI phase or removal of Vincristine and Dexamethasone pulses during the maintenance phase or to the control group, which will be treated with Doxorubicin in DI as well as Vincristine and Dexamethasone pulses during maintenance. Patients will only be randomised once.
Randomisation R1 and R2 are only considered for children since adults have worse outcome and very poor survival after relapse, but the risk-stratification is likely to reduce the number of high-risk cases also in the adult-group.
Patients stratified as intermediate risk-high (IR-high) are identified as having an increased risk of relapse and thus a less favourable prognosis than the standard- and intermediate risk-low groups, but a more favourable prognosis than the high risk patients. The majority of all relapses in childhood ALL is expected to occur in the IR-high group. Following a relapse, only approximately 40% of the children can be successfully treated again and for adults the corresponding figure is less than 20 %, so preventing relapses is very important. New treatment options that improves the antileukaemic efficacy and which have an improved safety profile are urgently needed.
For IR-high patients Randomisation 3 (R3) is available. In R3 patients will be randomised to receive either:
1. the first six weeks of maintenance treatment are replaced by two 3- week cycles of Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) - Besponsa®. This is followed by maintenance therapy similar to the standard arm.
2. the addition of low dose 6-tioguanine (6TG) as an addition to the standard maintenance therapy.
3. standard maintenance therapy.
Patients with ABL-class fusions in their leukaemic clone will, as a non-randomised experimental intervention, be treated with an addition of a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor during the induction phase (for patients \<25 years) and from the consolidation phase (patients ≥25 years). This intervention may shift therapy for previously resistant cases to lower intensity treatment with the associated reduced morbidity and may also reduce the number of relapses in analogy with the results in Ph+ ALL. The reason for not performing a randomised comparison is the rarity of the aberration and also the diversity of ABL-class fusions, reducing statistical power for any comparison further. For this reason, the results of this intervention may be pooled with other study-groups trying similar approaches.
A new intervention is introduced for Down syndrome patients with CD19 positive ALL: ALLTogether1 DS (NRI2). For Down syndrome-ALL patients who have end of Induction MRD detectable but \<25% two conventional chemotherapy consolidation blocks will be replaced with two blocks of Blinatumomab. Recruitment to this intervention was closed at the end of August 2024.
For high-risk B-lineage patients, CAR-T therapy can be an alternative to high-risk blocks and stem-cell transplant, but in this case the intervention (CAR-T infusion) will be performed outside the ALLTogether1 study. However, the stratification-system in ALLTogether1 will define the population with a potential CAR-T indication.
ALLTogether1 also includes five sub-studies:
Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of Imatinib in ABL-class fusion positive ALL
Target population: All ABL-class patients enrolled in the ALLTogether study. Biomaterials to be collected at diagnosis, during TKI treatment, follow-up and relapse.
Aims
1. To determine the efficacy and dosing target of imatinib in the treatment of ABL-class leukemia
2. To find the best discriminative biomarkers for TKI response in ABL-class ALL
3. To determine the frequency of intrinsic (at diagnosis) and acquired TKI resistance (due to treatment), including backtracking of mutations using imatinib PK/PD findings during treatment
4. To find causes of TKI resistance in ABL-class patients
5. To describe the pharmacokinetics of Imatinib in TKI-treated patients
Objectives
1. To determine the percent of ABL-class patients who need to switch from IR-high to HR because of high MRD levels
2. To determine the effect of imatinib exposure on clinical outcome, including pharmacokinetic measurements of imatinib
3. To determine the molecular response to imatinib by monitoring fusion gene levels and mutational spectrum at diagnosis and during follow up
4. To determine whether the molecular response parameters reflect the Ig/TCR MRD or flow-MRD response or are a better predictor of therapy failure than Ig/TCR or flow-based MRD monitoring
5. To determine the phosphorylation status of ABL-class proteins and presence of TKI-resistance associated mutations in ABL genes prior to imatinib treatment and the emergence of such mutations during treatment with imatinib
6. To determine the presence of mutations in regulatory /other genes before and during imatinib treatment and functionally address the importance of these mutations in TKI resistance
7. To determine whether the efficacy of TKIs depends on the type of fusion gene
8. To describe inter- and intraindividual variations in imatinib PK (=trough levels) during therapy of ABL-class ALL
9. To describe associations between PK of imatinib and end-of-induction MRD (\<25 yrs only) and end-of-consolidation MRD (all patients)
10. To describe associations between imatinib PK and relapse rates (overall, bone-marrow and CNS), event-free survival as well as overall survival;
11. To describe associations between imatinib PK and toxicities (including e.g. height z-scores at diagnosis and end of therapy, pancreatitis, treatment delays) with focus on those toxicities that are routinely monitored in ALLTogether.
Biomarkers to Reform Approaches to therapy-Induced Neurotoxicity (BRAIN)
Target population: All patients registered on ALLTogether1 aged ≥ 4 years at end of therapy (Arm A) and all patients registered on ALLTogether1 aged 2-21 years at start of therapy (Arm B) and without:
1. Pre-existing neurodevelopmental delay (e.g Trisomy 21) prior to diagnosis of ALL
2. Significant visual or motor impairment preventing use of a computer/touch screen ipad
All centres are invited to enrol to arm A (Main BRAIN) of the study. Arm B (Longitudinal BRAIN) will be carried out in selected centres.
Aims
1. To implement universal screening of all children for adverse neurocognitive outcomes at the end of treatment using a validated user-friendly computer software programme (CogState) and compare neurocognitive outcomes by treatment allocation (Arm A).
2. To identify risk factors for adverse outcomes including whether acute neurotoxic events are associated with poor performance on cognitive tests at end of therapy compared to patients without acute neurotoxicity (Arm A).
3. To examine changes in neurocognitive performance over time and the risk/protective factors associated with differences in outcome, such as demographic, clinical, and physical/psychosocial factors (Arm B).
Primary end-point
a. Proportion of children with a z-score \<1.5 on detection and/or identification CogState tasks in each treatment arm at the end of ALL therapy. A z-score \< 1.5 correlates with moderate cognitive impairment at a level that may require additional support.
Secondary and exploratory end-points
1. Association between CogState scores at end of treatment and overt neurotoxic episodes as recorded on the trial adverse event database.
2. Association between Cogstate scores and clinical and demographic variables - age, sex, ethnicity, CNS status.
3. Proportion of children with scores \<1.5SD for one card learning (learning), one back (working memory), Groton's maze (executive function), digit symbol substitution (processing speed) on different treatment arms.
4. Association between CogState scores and patient reported outcome measures/Quality of life measurements collected as part of the main ALLTogether1 trial.
5. Changes in neurocognitive scores over time, including CogState and BRIEF-2/BRIEF-A scores.
6. Association between neurocognitive scores over time and interactions with demographic variables (age, sex), clinical variables (treatment arm, neurotoxicity), social-emotional and physical functioning (SDQ, PedsQL 4.0 Generic; PedsQL 3.0 Fatigue), and family factors (MEES; PedsQL FIM).
Association between asparaginase activity levels and outcome
Target population: All patients included in the ALLTogether1 protocol are eligible for participation.
Primary aim
To study the association between asparaginase activity levels and outcome (MRD, relapse, survival)
Secondary aims
1. To evaluate the association between asparaginase activity levels and toxicities, such as pancreatitis, infections and deep venous thrombosis (DVT)
2. To evaluate the association between asparaginase activity levels and hepatotoxicity in a subset of patients
CSF-Flow
Target population: All patients included in the ALLTogether1 protocol are eligible for participation
Aims
1. To use cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow cytometry (FCM) to improve the accuracy of diagnostic tests for CNS leukaemia compared to conventional CSF cytology. An associated objective will be to develop a recommended protocol for CSF flow cytometry with external quality assessment to ensure uniformity of measurement across the ALLTogether consortium.
2. To investigate whether negative FCM identifies a group of children at very low risk of CNS relapse, suitable for testing de-escalation of CNS-directed therapy in future trials.
3. To investigate whether positive FCM can identify children at increased risk of CNS relapse and whether patients with persistent positivity (FCM positive at day 15 onwards) might benefit from studies testing escalated CNS-directed therapy or a switch to more intensive treatment arms.
4. To collect matching CSF supernatant for studies comparing CSF FCM with soluble biomarkers (e.g. metabolic, cell-free DNA, proteomic and microRNA).
Maintenance therapy pharmacokinetics/-dynamics study
Target population: All patients included in the ALLTogether1 protocol are eligible for participation. For IR-high patients participating in the randomised InO- and TEAM sub-protocols, the monitoring of 6-mercaptopurine (6MP)/Methotrexate (MTX) metabolites at three months intervals is mandatory.
Aims and specific objectives
1. To map pharmacokinetics of 6MP and MTX during maintenance therapy in all patients in the ALLTogether protocol.
2. To associate metabolite profiles with TPMT and NUDT15 variants, as routinely analysed in ALLTogether.
3. To explore the association of event-free survival with DNA-TG and other 6MP/MTX metabolites.
4. To explore the association between risk of second cancers with DNA-TG and other 6MP/MTX metabolites.
5. To explore the association of risk of invasive infections with DNA-TG and other 6MP/MTX metabolites.
6. To explore the association of risk of osteonecrosis with DNA-TG and other 6MP/MTX metabolites.
7. To explore the association of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome with DNA-TG and other 6MP/MTX metabolites.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
R1 - SR standard arm
Standard risk arm receiving standard treatment (Delayed Intensification including Doxorubicin).
No interventions assigned to this group
R1 - SR experimental arm
Standard risk arm, receiving Delayed Intensification without Doxorubicin IV 3 x 30 mg/m2/dose.
Omitted Doxorubicin
Omission of IV Doxorubicin
R2 - IR-low standard arm
Standard treatment with Delayed Intensification including Doxorubicin and Maintenance including Vincristine+Dexamethasone pulses.
No interventions assigned to this group
R2 - IR-low experimental arm A
Standard treatment with omission of Doxorubicin IV 3 x 30 mg/m2/dose in the Delayed Intensification phase.
Omitted Doxorubicin
Omission of IV Doxorubicin
R3 - IR-high standard arm
Intermediate risk high arm receiving Standard Maintenance Therapy.
No interventions assigned to this group
R3-InO - IR-high experimental arm
Inotuzumab IV 0,5 mg/m2, given on days 253, 260, 267 and on days 274, 281, 288 before start of Standard Maintenance Therapy.
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Standard Maintenance Therapy
Addition of IV Inotuzumab ozogamicin before Maintenance Therapy
ABL-class fusions intervention
Imatinib p.o. 340 mg/m2 given daily from day 15 or 30 (depending on age) to the end of therapy (week 106) in addition to Standard IR-high chemotherapy.
Imatinib
p.o. Imatinib
R3-TEAM - IR-high experimental arm
6-tioguanine p.o, 2,5-12,5 mg/m2, given daily in addition to Standard Maintenance Therapy.
6-tioguanine+Standard Maintenance Therapy
Addition of p.o. 6-tioguanine to Standard Maintenance Therapy
ALLTogether1 DS Blinatumomab intervention
Blinatumomab IV, 5 mcg/m2/day up to 28 mcg/day (detailed dosing in protocol) continous infusion. Two 28 day courses with a two week treatment free interval in between. Blinatumomab courses replace Consolidation 1 and Consolidation 2 in the standard protocol adapted for Down syndrome patients.
Blinatumomab
IV Blinatumomab
R2 - IR-low experimental arm B
Standard treatment with omission of monthly pulses of Vincristine IV 1,5 mg/m2/dose and 5 days of Dexamethasone p.o. 6 mg/m2/day in the Maintenance Phase.
Omitted Vincristine+Dexamethasone pulses
Omission of Vincristine+Dexamethasone pulses
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Omitted Doxorubicin
Omission of IV Doxorubicin
Omitted Vincristine+Dexamethasone pulses
Omission of Vincristine+Dexamethasone pulses
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Standard Maintenance Therapy
Addition of IV Inotuzumab ozogamicin before Maintenance Therapy
Imatinib
p.o. Imatinib
6-tioguanine+Standard Maintenance Therapy
Addition of p.o. 6-tioguanine to Standard Maintenance Therapy
Blinatumomab
IV Blinatumomab
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 0 - \< 46 years (one day before 46th birthday) at the time of diagnosis with the exception of infants with KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2A-r) BCP ALL.
* Patients with surface immunoglobulin negative (sIG-) BCP-ALL and an IG::MYC rearrangement, unless they have a concurrent BCL2/6 rearrangement. T-ALL patients with MYC translocations.
* Informed consent signed by the patient and/or parents/legal guardians according to country-specific age-related guidelines.
* The ALL diagnosis should be confirmed by an accredited laboratory at a participating paediatric oncology or adult haematology centre.
* The patient should be diagnosed and treated at a participating paediatric oncology or adult haematology centre in the participating countries.
* The patient should be a resident in one of the participating countries on a permanent basis or should intend to settle in a participating country, for instance by an application for asylum. Patients who are visiting the country as tourists should not be included. However, returning expatriots with primary diagnosis abroad may be included if no treatment has been administered and the diagnostic procedures are repeated at a participating centre.
* All women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) have to have a negative pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior to the start of treatment.
* For each intervention/randomisation an additional set of inclusion-criteria is provided.
Exclusion Criteria
* Age \>45 years at diagnosis.
* Patients with a previous malignant diagnosis (ALL as a second malignant neoplasm - SMN).
* Relapse of ALL.
* Patients with mature B-ALL (as defined by surface IG positivity) or any patients with IG::MYC and a concurrent BCL2/6 rearrangement.
* Patients with Ph-positive ALL (documented presence of t(9;22)(q34;q11) and/or of the BCR::ABL fusion transcript). These patients will be transferred to an appropriate trial for t(9;22) if available.
* Previously known ALL prone syndromes (e.g. Li-Fraumeni syndrome, germline ETV6 mutation), except for Down syndrome. Exploration for such ALL prone syndromes is not mandatory and patients in whom genetic work-up reveals a new germ-line mutation (index-cases) will remain in the study.
* Treatment with systemic corticosteroids corresponding to (\>10mg prednisolone/m2/day) for more than one week and/or other chemotherapeutic agents in a 4-week interval prior to diagnosis (pre-treatment).
* Pre-existing contraindications to any treatment according to the ALLTogether protocol (constitutional or acquired disease prior to the diagnosis of ALL preventing adequate treatment).
* Any other disease or condition, as determined by the investigator, which could interfere with the participation in the study according to the study protocol, or with the ability of the patients to cooperate and comply with the study procedures.
* Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant at the time of diagnosis.
* Women of childbearing potential and fertile men who are sexually active and are unwilling to use adequate contraception during therapy. Efficient birth control is required.
* Female patients, who are breast-feeding.
* Essential data missing from the registration of characteristics at diagnosis (in consultation with the protocol chair).
* For each intervention/randomisation an additional set of exclusion-criteria is provided.
0 Years
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Swedish Research Council
OTHER_GOV
The Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation
UNKNOWN
Pfizer
INDUSTRY
Servier
INDUSTRY
NordForsk
UNKNOWN
Aamu Pediatric Cancer Foundation
UNKNOWN
German Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology GPOH gGmbH
OTHER
Clinical Trial Center North (CTC North GmbH & Co. KG)
OTHER
Belgium Health Care Knowledge Centre
OTHER_GOV
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Cancer Research UK
OTHER
Fundação Rui Osório de Castro
UNKNOWN
Acreditar - Associação de Pais e Amigos das Crianças com Cancro
UNKNOWN
Grupo Português De Leucemias Pediátricas
UNKNOWN
Amgen
INDUSTRY
Nova Laboratories Limited
INDUSTRY
Danish Child Cancer Foundation
OTHER
Danish Cancer Society
OTHER
The Novo Nordic Foundation
OTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins
OTHER_GOV
Swedish Cancer Society
OTHER
Mats Heyman
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mats Heyman
MD, Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mats Heyman, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Karolinska University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
L'hôpital Universitaire des enfants Reine Fabiola (Huderf)
Brussels, , Belgium
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (UCL)
Brussels, , Belgium
University Hospital Antwerp
Edegem, , Belgium
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, , Belgium
University Hospital Leuven, Dept of Paediatrics
Leuven, , Belgium
CHC MontLégia, Boulevard Patience et Beaujonc 2
Liège, , Belgium
CHR de la Citadelle
Liège, , Belgium
Aalborg University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Aalborg, , Denmark
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, , Denmark
Aarhus University Hospital, Child and Adolescent Health
Aarhus, , Denmark
Rigshospitalet, Dept of Haematology
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Rigshospitalet, Dept of Paediatrics
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Odense University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Odense, , Denmark
North Estonia Medical Centre, Dept of Haematology
Tallinn, , Estonia
Tallinn Children´s Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Tallinn, , Estonia
Tartu University Hospital
Tartu, , Estonia
Helsinki University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Helsinki, , Finland
Helsinki University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Helsinki, , Finland
Kuopio University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Kuopio, , Finland
Kuopio University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Kuopio, , Finland
Oulu University Hospital, Dept of Haematology, Dept of Medicine
Oulu, , Finland
Oulu University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Oulu, , Finland
Tampere University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Tampere, , Finland
Tampere University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Tampere, , Finland
Turku University Hospital, Clinical Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit
Turku, , Finland
Turku University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Turku, , Finland
CHU Amiens Groupe Hospitalier Sud
Amiens, , France
CHU Angers
Angers, , France
CHRU Besançon
Besançon, , France
CHU Bordeaux - Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin
Bordeaux, , France
CHRU Brest - Morvan
Brest, , France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caen
Caen, , France
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
CHU Dijon Hôpital François Mitterrand
Dijon, , France
CHU de Grenoble site Nord - Hôpital Albert Michallon
Grenoble, , France
CHRU de Lille - Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre
Lille, , France
Hôpital de la mère et de l'enfant
Limoges, , France
CHU de Lyon HCL - GH Est-Institut d'hématologie et d'oncologie pédiatrique IHOP
Lyon, , France
CHU de Marseille - Hôpital de la Timone
Marseille, , France
CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier, , France
CHU Nantes-Hôpital enfant-adolescent
Nantes, , France
CHU Nice - Hôpital l'Archet 2
Nice, , France
CHU Paris Saint Louis
Paris, , France
CHU Paris Armand Trousseau
Paris, , France
CHU Paris - Hôpital Robert Debré
Paris, , France
CHU Poitiers
Poitiers, , France
CHU Reims-American Hospital
Reims, , France
CHU Rennes - Hôpital sud
Rennes, , France
CHU Rouen
Rouen, , France
CHU De La Réunion - Site Nord (Hôpital Félix GUYON)
Saint-Denis, , France
CHU Saint Etienne Hôpital Nord
Saint-Etienne, , France
CHU Strasbourg -Hôpital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, , France
CHU Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
CHRU Tours- Hôpital Clocheville
Tours, , France
CHU de Nancy - Hôpital de Brabois Enfant
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France
Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel
Bielefeld, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, , Germany
Klinikum Bremen Mitte
Bremen, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, , Germany
HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld
Krefeld, , Germany
Universitätsmedizin Mainz
Mainz, , Germany
Landspitali University Hospital, Children's Hospital
Reykjavik, , Iceland
Our Lady's Children's Hospital
Dublin, , Ireland
Children's Hospital, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
Vilnius, , Lithuania
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
Vilnius, , Lithuania
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
Utrecht, , Netherlands
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Haukeland University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Bergen, , Norway
Haukeland University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Bergen, , Norway
Oslo University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Oslo, , Norway
Oslo University Hospital, Dept of paediatric haemato- and oncology
Oslo, , Norway
Stavanger University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Stavanger, , Norway
University Hospital North Norway, Dept of Haematology
Tromsø, , Norway
University Hospital of North Norway, Dept of Paediatrics
Tromsø, , Norway
St. Olavs University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Trondheim, , Norway
St. Olavs University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Trondheim, , Norway
Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, EPE - Hospital Pediátrico de Coimbra
Coimbra, , Portugal
Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE
Lisbon, , Portugal
Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, EPE
Porto, , Portugal
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Section for Haematology and coagulation
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Dept of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Linköping University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Linköping, , Sweden
Linköping University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Linköping, , Sweden
Skåne University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Lund, , Sweden
Skåne University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Lund, , Sweden
Örebro University Hospital, Section for Haematology
Örebro, , Sweden
Karolinska University Hospital, Dept of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology
Stockholm, , Sweden
Karolinska University Hospital, Patient area Haematology
Stockholm, , Sweden
Norrland University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Umeå, , Sweden
Norrland University Hospital, Dept of Paediatrics
Umeå, , Sweden
Uppsala University Hospital, Dept of Haematology
Uppsala, , Sweden
Uppsala University Hospital, Dept of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology
Uppsala, , Sweden
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen
Aberdeen, , United Kingdom
Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Aberdeen
Aberdeen, , United Kingdom
Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast
Belfast, , United Kingdom
Belfast City Hospital, Belfast
Belfast, , United Kingdom
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
Bristol Royal Hospital for Children / Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, , United Kingdom
Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge
Cambridge, , United Kingdom
Noah's Ark Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff
Cardiff, , United Kingdom
University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff
Cardiff, , United Kingdom
Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
Dundee, , United Kingdom
Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
Edinburgh, , United Kingdom
Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh
Edinburgh, , United Kingdom
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds
Leeds, , United Kingdom
Leeds St James University Hospital
Leeds, , United Kingdom
Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester
Leicester, , United Kingdom
Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool
Liverpool, , United Kingdom
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Liverpool, , United Kingdom
University College London Hospital, London
London, , United Kingdom
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London
London, , United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
St. Bartholomews Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester
Manchester, , United Kingdom
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (PTC)
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle
Newcastle, , United Kingdom
Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle
Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom
Nottingham City Hospital
Nottingham, , United Kingdom
Nottingham Queen's Medical Centre
Nottingham, , United Kingdom
Churchill Hospital, Oxford
Oxford, , United Kingdom
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, , United Kingdom
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
Southampton General Hospital, Southampton
Southampton, , United Kingdom
Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke
Stoke, , United Kingdom
Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton
Sutton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Toft N, Birgens H, Abrahamsson J, Griskevicius L, Hallbook H, Heyman M, Klausen TW, Jonsson OG, Palk K, Pruunsild K, Quist-Paulsen P, Vaitkeviciene G, Vettenranta K, Asberg A, Frandsen TL, Marquart HV, Madsen HO, Noren-Nystrom U, Schmiegelow K. Results of NOPHO ALL2008 treatment for patients aged 1-45 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2018 Mar;32(3):606-615. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.265. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
Schramm F, Zimmermann M, Jorch N, Pekrun A, Borkhardt A, Imschweiler T, Christiansen H, Faber J, Feuchtinger T, Schmid I, Beron G, Horstmann MA, Escherich G. Daunorubicin during delayed intensification decreases the incidence of infectious complications - a randomized comparison in trial CoALL 08-09. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Jan;60(1):60-68. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1473575. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
Mondelaers V, Suciu S, De Moerloose B, Ferster A, Mazingue F, Plat G, Yakouben K, Uyttebroeck A, Lutz P, Costa V, Sirvent N, Plouvier E, Munzer M, Poiree M, Minckes O, Millot F, Plantaz D, Maes P, Hoyoux C, Cave H, Rohrlich P, Bertrand Y, Benoit Y; Children-s Leukemia Group (CLG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Prolonged versus standard native E. coli asparaginase therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: final results of the EORTC-CLG randomized phase III trial 58951. Haematologica. 2017 Oct;102(10):1727-1738. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.165845. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
Vora A, Goulden N, Wade R, Mitchell C, Hancock J, Hough R, Rowntree C, Richards S. Treatment reduction for children and young adults with low-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia defined by minimal residual disease (UKALL 2003): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):199-209. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70600-9. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
Pieters R, de Groot-Kruseman H, Van der Velden V, Fiocco M, van den Berg H, de Bont E, Egeler RM, Hoogerbrugge P, Kaspers G, Van der Schoot E, De Haas V, Van Dongen J. Successful Therapy Reduction and Intensification for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Based on Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring: Study ALL10 From the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;34(22):2591-601. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.6364. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
Toksvang LN, Als-Nielsen B, Bacon C, Bertasiute R, Duarte X, Escherich G, Helgadottir EA, Johannsdottir IR, Jonsson OG, Kozlowski P, Langenskjold C, Lepik K, Niinimaki R, Overgaard UM, Punab M, Raty R, Segers H, van der Sluis I, Smith OP, Strullu M, Vaitkeviciene G, Wik HS, Heyman M, Schmiegelow K. Thiopurine Enhanced ALL Maintenance (TEAM): study protocol for a randomized study to evaluate the improvement in disease-free survival by adding very low dose 6-thioguanine to 6-mercaptopurine/methotrexate-based maintenance therapy in pediatric and adult patients (0-45 years) with newly diagnosed B-cell precursor or T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the intermediate risk-high group of the ALLTogether1 protocol. BMC Cancer. 2022 May 2;22(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09522-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ALLTogether1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.