Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Pediatric Regimen in Brazil

NCT ID: NCT05959720

Last Updated: 2025-05-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-05

Study Completion Date

2030-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this project, the investigators intend to start a prospective registry for patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative ALL from 16 years old and above in participating centers, provided that all patients will be treated with the same regimen (a pediatric regimen BFM-based incorporating peg-asparaginase). All diagnostic/follow-up (after induction and consolidation blocks) samples will be centrally biobanked at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo. The main goal of this study is to examine whether the implementation of a pediatric protocol under a prospective registry can increase event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of newly diagnosed patients in the participating centers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Notably, pediatric regimens for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have resulted in better long-term outcomes, especially in the Philadelphia-negative counterpart. These regimens are essentially based on higher cumulative doses of asparaginase and the use of less myelotoxic agents, applying allogeneic transplantation only for high-risk ALL subsets. Recent metanalysis encompassing 27 clinical trials demonstrated an improved prognosis when these regimens are adopted. In adults, incorporation of these regimens has been hampered by a perception of higher toxicity and a more complex design, especially with asparaginase. Remarkably, this drug might bring side effects not usually seen with other cancer drugs, such as thrombosis, liver, and pancreatic toxicities. In addition, the incorporation of minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring throughout the treatment protocol in a scheduled and standardized manner is considered paramount in the contemporary ALL treatment. Treating adult patients with acute leukemia under prospective studies allows accurate data collection and positively impacts the disease prognosis, creating a cooperative scientific environment. In Brazil, few data are available on the clinical- laboratory characteristics of ALL in adults and their outcomes under a standardized treatment protocol. Few single-center reports point to a worse overall survival rate when compared to developed countries. There is great heterogeneity across the centers regarding the treatment regimens and genetic/MRD assessment. In this project, the investigators intend to start a prospective registry for patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative ALL from 16 years old and above in participating centers, provided that all patients will be treated with the same regimen (a pediatric regimen BFM-based incorporating peg-asparaginase). All diagnostic/follow-up (after induction and consolidation blocks) samples will be centrally biobanked at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo. At the diagnosis, a genetic characterization encompassing conventional karyotype, fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), and molecular biology in our central laboratory will be performed to classify the cases. Genomic classification will include identifying Philadelphia- like B-cell ALL cases, a recent group of cases with worse prognosis, whose incidence seems higher in Hispanics. In Brazil, there is no study addressing this incidence and, more importantly, evaluating its impact on outcomes under a standardized treatment protocol. MRD analysis will also be centralized to standardize and validate our flow cytometry panel in a homogeneous cohort. Additionally, the investigators plan to assess baseline factors predictive of survival and relapse and those related to major toxicities such as infections, liver toxicity, and thrombosis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Lymphoid Leukemia Minimal Residual Disease Gene Abnormality Chemotherapeutic Toxicity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Eligible patients

All patients deemed eligible to intensive protocol of treatment are going to be included as sole group. There is no intervention or control group in this trial.

Prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg/m2 D1 to D21

Vincristin

Intervention Type DRUG

1.5 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15 and D22

Daunorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

40 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15 and D22

Peg-asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

2000 UI/m2 D12 and D26

Intrathecal Suspension

Intervention Type DRUG

MTX 12 mg, Dexamethasone 2 mg, Cytarabine 60 mg D1, D8, D15, D22, D29

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

1000 mg/m2 D36 and D64

Cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

75 mg/m2 D36 to D39, D43 to D46, D50 to D53 and D57 to D60

Mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

30 mg/m2 D36 to D63 and D1 to D56 of consolidation

Methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

3.000 mg/m2 D8, D22, D36 and D50

Doxorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

30 mg/m2 D1 and D22

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prednisone

60 mg/m2 D1 to D21

Intervention Type DRUG

Vincristin

1.5 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15 and D22

Intervention Type DRUG

Daunorubicin

40 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15 and D22

Intervention Type DRUG

Peg-asparaginase

2000 UI/m2 D12 and D26

Intervention Type DRUG

Intrathecal Suspension

MTX 12 mg, Dexamethasone 2 mg, Cytarabine 60 mg D1, D8, D15, D22, D29

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide

1000 mg/m2 D36 and D64

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine

75 mg/m2 D36 to D39, D43 to D46, D50 to D53 and D57 to D60

Intervention Type DRUG

Mercaptopurine

30 mg/m2 D36 to D63 and D1 to D56 of consolidation

Intervention Type DRUG

Methotrexate

3.000 mg/m2 D8, D22, D36 and D50

Intervention Type DRUG

Doxorubicin

30 mg/m2 D1 and D22

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Burkitt leukemia
* Prior myeloproliferative disease
* Philadelphia chromosome positivity through whichever methodology (RT-PCR, FISH, or conventional karyotype)
* ECOG\>2 (appendix 3)
* Total bilirubin\>2x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Transaminases\>5x ULN
* Creatinine\>2,5 mg/dl
* Positive serology for HIV or HTLV
* Heart failure NYHA Class III or IV (appendix 4)
* Severe psychiatric disorder which prevents adequate compliance
* Prior treatment with intravenous chemotherapy
* Refusal to participate in the study
* Down syndrome
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Servier

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wellington Fernandes

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wellington F Silva, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

Eduardo M Rego, MD PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Graziela Silva

Role: CONTACT

551138934677

Bruna Moraes, MSc

Role: CONTACT

551126628112

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Wellington F Silva, MD PhD

Role: primary

551138944677

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Silva WF, Amano MT, Perruso LL, Cordeiro MG, Kishimoto RK, de Medeiros Leal A, Nardinelli L, Bendit I, Velloso ED, Rego EM, Rocha V. Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a resource-constrained setting: outcomes after expansion of genetic evaluation. Hematology. 2022 Dec;27(1):396-403. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2052602.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35344469 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3011/22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.