Evaluation of HIFU in TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER and OF RECURRENCE AFTER RADIOTHERAPY

NCT ID: NCT04307056

Last Updated: 2023-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3862 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-23

Study Completion Date

2022-08-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

to compare the efficacy of HIFU treatment with standard treatment in two situations:

1. as first-line cancer treatment, HIFU is compared to radical prostatectomy.
2. for patients with recurrence after external beam radiotherapy, HIFU treatment is compared to radical prostatectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer Ultrasound Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HIFU

Patients Treated with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The treatment with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) evaluated in this study will be delivered by 2 types of medical devices currently available on the market, Ablatherm® and Focal One®. They are both computer-controlled and provided with an endo-rectal probe with integrated ultrasound, enabling planning and the monitoring of treatment of localized prostate cancer in realtime.

Prostatectomy

Patients Treated by Radical Prostatectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radical Prostatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The surgical approach can be open or laparoscopic. The procedure begins with lymph node dissection for the intermediate risk groups (PSA \> 10 ng/mL and/or presence of grade 4 Gleason score). Total prostatectomy includes removal of the seminal vesicles. It can preserve 1 or 2 neurovascular bundles, depending on the cancer stage and/or the choice expressed by the patient. The vesicourethral suture is either a running or interrupted suture, and there is drainage by a bladder catheter for at least 5 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radical Prostatectomy

The surgical approach can be open or laparoscopic. The procedure begins with lymph node dissection for the intermediate risk groups (PSA \> 10 ng/mL and/or presence of grade 4 Gleason score). Total prostatectomy includes removal of the seminal vesicles. It can preserve 1 or 2 neurovascular bundles, depending on the cancer stage and/or the choice expressed by the patient. The vesicourethral suture is either a running or interrupted suture, and there is drainage by a bladder catheter for at least 5 days.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment

The treatment with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) evaluated in this study will be delivered by 2 types of medical devices currently available on the market, Ablatherm® and Focal One®. They are both computer-controlled and provided with an endo-rectal probe with integrated ultrasound, enabling planning and the monitoring of treatment of localized prostate cancer in realtime.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate classified as T1-2, N0, Nx M0
* classified as low or intermediate risk
* Patient with PSA \< 15 ng/ml, Gleason score ≤ 7 restricted to the form \[3 + 4\].
* Biopsy with at least 12 specimens and a maximum of four out of six invaded sextants
* Patient with a pelvic MRI if there is an intermediate risk and a bone scintigraphy if PSA \> 10 ng/ml
* Patient affiliated with health insurance or beneficiary of an equivalent plan


* Patients 70 years of age or older
* Patients with a life expectancy related to age and associated illness estimated to be greater than 5 years


• Patients with a life expectancy greater than 10 years and a state of health allowing general anaesthesia.


* Patient participating in other biomedical research within 3 months prior to their inclusion in this protocol
* Included patient simultaneously participating in another research study
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Association Francaise d'Urologie

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier d'Aix en Provence

Aix-en-Provence, , France

Site Status

Polyckinique du Beaujolais

Arnas, , France

Site Status

Clinique St Etienne

Bayonne, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Besançon

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Clinique St Vincent

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Clinique Tivoli-Ducos

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Clinique St Augustin

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CHU de Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Nouvelle clinique Bel Air

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CHR de Chambéry

Chambéry, , France

Site Status

Pôle Santé Léonard de Vinci

Chambray-lès-Tours, , France

Site Status

PôleSanté République

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Hôpitaux civils de Colmar

Colmar, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique du parc Drevon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CHU de Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Cliniqe du Val d'Ouest

Écully, , France

Site Status

CHU de Grenoble

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Privé Drome Ardèche

Guilherand-Granges, , France

Site Status

Cliique du Pré

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Clinique Bon Secours

Le Puy-en-Velay, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Clinique La Louvière

Lille, , France

Site Status

CHU de Limoges

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Hospices Civils de lyon

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Hôpital St Joseph

Marseille, , France

Site Status

AP-AM

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Clinique Beau Soleil

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Clinique Diaconat-Roosevelt

Mulhouse, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nice

Nice, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nîmes

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Fondation St Jean de Dieu - Clinique Oudinot

Paris, , France

Site Status

Clinique Turin

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital St Joseph

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital TENON

Paris, , France

Site Status

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Europeen Georges Pompidou

Paris, , France

Site Status

CH de pontoise

Pontoise, , France

Site Status

Clinique Courlancy

Reims, , France

Site Status

CHU de rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Clinique Nantes Atlantis

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

CH de Saintonge

Saintes, , France

Site Status

Clinique Rhéna

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Foch

Suresnes, , France

Site Status

Clinique St Michel

Toulon, , France

Site Status

CHU de Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Clinique Pasteur

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Clinique St Jean du Languedoc

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Clinique Océanne

Vannes, , France

Site Status

CHU de guadeloupe

Pointe-à-Pitre, , Guadeloupe

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France Guadeloupe

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ploussard G, Coloby P, Chevallier T, Occean BV, Houede N, Villers A, Rischmann P; HIFI group. Whole-gland or Subtotal High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Versus Radical Prostatectomy: The Prospective, Noninferiority, Nonrandomized HIFI Trial. Eur Urol. 2025 May;87(5):526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.006. Epub 2024 Dec 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39632125 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-A01042-43

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HIFU/AFU/12.03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

BPH Global Registry
NCT05543200 RECRUITING