Clinical Trial of Prostatic Arterial Embolization Versus a Sham Procedure to Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

NCT ID: NCT02074644

Last Updated: 2020-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-02

Study Completion Date

2019-03-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) compared is an effective and safe treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms not adequately controlled by medical therapy with alpha-blockers, as assessed by the the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after 6 months. Patients will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to PAE or to a sham procedure and evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months. Patients randomized to the sham procedure will be offered the possibility of performing PAE after 6 months. All patients may participate on an optional 6-months extension study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized, parallel-group, evaluator-blind, superiority, controlled clinical trial of PAE versus a sham procedure in patients with BPH with severe LUTS not adequately controlled by medical therapy with alpha-blockers.

This study has a screening visit at day -14, a baseline visit at day -2, a randomization and intervention visit at day 0, follow up visits at months 1, 3 and 6.

Patients initially randomized to the sham procedure and who completed the 6 month follow-up period will be offered the possibility of performing PAE at no cost. All patients will be invited to participate in a 6 months post-trial extension study.

Patients over 45 years-old with a diagnosis of BPH associated with severe LUTS defined by an IPSS\>=20 after a minimum of 6 months treatment with alpha-blockers and with a prostate volume ≥ 40 mL will start a two weeks screening period. Eligible patients will be started either tamsulosin 0.4 mg q.d., alfuzosin 10 mg q.d. or silodosin 8 mg q.d., which will be maintained throughout the study period, and have the intervention scheduled for the following 2 days (study day 0), when they will be randomized to PAE or to a sham procedure if the procedure is technically feasible

Those patients in whom angiography has shown that PAE is technically feasible will be randomized to one of the study arms on a 1:1 ratio. Patients in both groups will be submitted to exactly the same procedure, except that patients randomized to the control group will not be injected with polyvinyl alcohol particles. Patients will be discharged as soon as their clinical condition is stabilized

Patients will be assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months with IPSS, QoL, IIEF, BPH-II and will perform prostatic ultrasonography, uroflowmetry and PSA at month 1 and 6. At 1 month a pelvic NMR will be performed to evaluate prostate volume and the degree of ischemia.

Patients completing the 6 month follow-up period will be invited to enter a 6 months extension study. In this extension study, patients will be evaluated at month 12 for all efficacy variables. Patients initially randomized to the sham procedure who wanted to perform PAE after the conclusion of the trial will be evaluated only at months 1, 3 and 6 after PAE.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign Genital Diseases, Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Prostatic Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prostatic Arterial Embolization

Selective catheterization of the prostatic arteries followed by slow injection of Bead Block 300-500 or PVA 100+200 micra particles under fluoroscopic control.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prostatic Arterial Embolization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The prostatic arteries are selectively catheterized with a Progreat 2.7 microcatheter and an angiography is performed to confirm that the catheter is in the prostatic artery. Bead Block 300-500 or PVA 100+200 micra particles are slowly injected under fluoroscopic control until the end point is reached. Embolization is considered finished when there is "near stasis" in the prostatic vessels with interruption of the arterial flow and prostatic gland opacification checked in both oblique and AP views. Upon finishing the embolization of the left prostatic arteries, the right prostatic arteries are embolized in the same way.

Sham procedure

Selective catheterization of the prostatic arteries followed by removal of the catheter with no particles injected.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The prostatic arteries are selectively catheterized with a Progreat 2.7 microcatheter and an angiography is performed to confirm that the catheter is in the prostatic artery. The catheter is removed and no particles are injected.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prostatic Arterial Embolization

The prostatic arteries are selectively catheterized with a Progreat 2.7 microcatheter and an angiography is performed to confirm that the catheter is in the prostatic artery. Bead Block 300-500 or PVA 100+200 micra particles are slowly injected under fluoroscopic control until the end point is reached. Embolization is considered finished when there is "near stasis" in the prostatic vessels with interruption of the arterial flow and prostatic gland opacification checked in both oblique and AP views. Upon finishing the embolization of the left prostatic arteries, the right prostatic arteries are embolized in the same way.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sham procedure

The prostatic arteries are selectively catheterized with a Progreat 2.7 microcatheter and an angiography is performed to confirm that the catheter is in the prostatic artery. The catheter is removed and no particles are injected.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male patients ≥ 45 years-old
* Diagnosis of BPH based on clinical history, digital rectal examination, urine sediment, transrectal prostate ultrasound and PSA
* Use of a marketed alpha-blocker for LUTS/BPH in the previous 6 months
* Severe lower urinary tract symptoms at screening and baseline defined by all the following: IPSS (7 items) ≥ 20, QoL ≥ 3, Qmax \< 12 mL/s and prostate volume ≥ 40 mL
* CTA shows that prostatic arteries are feasible for PAE
* Sexual dysfunction or accepting the risk of developing sexual dysfunction after treatment
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous surgical or invasive prostate treatments such as TURP, TUMT, TUNA, laser or any other minimally invasive treatment
* Acute or chronic prostatitis or suspected prostatitis including chronic pain, intermittent pain or abnormal sensation in the penis, testis, anal or pelvic area in the past 12 months
* History of prostate or bladder cancer or pelvic irradiation
* Active or recurrent urinary tract infections (more than 1 episode in the last 12 months)
* History of neurogenic bladder or LUTS secondary to neurological disease
* Advanced atherosclerosis and tortuosity of iliac and prostatic arteries
* Secondary renal insufficiency (due to prostatic obstruction)
* Large bladder diverticula or stones
* Detrusor failure
* Previous history of acute urinary retention
* Current severe, significant or uncontrolled disease (including, but not limited to metabolic, hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, endocrine, cardiac, infectious or gastrointestinal, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥95 mmHg), congestive heart failure \[New York Heart Association status of class III or IV\], myocardial infarction within 26 weeks prior to randomization), which in the judgment of the clinical investigator renders the subject unsuitable for the trial and puts the subject at increased risk
* Any bleeding disorder such as hemophilia, clotting factor deficiency, anti-coagulation or bleeding diathesis
* Hypersensitivity or contraindication to tamsulosin use
* Administration of 5-ARIs, finasteride and dutasteride in the previous 2 weeks and 4 months, respectively. These patients may be included if they stop those medications and replace them for tansulosin, alfuzosin or silodosin for at least 2 weeks and 4 months, respectively.
* Any mental condition or disorder that would interfere with the subject's ability to provide informed consent
* Participation in a study of any investigational drug or device in the previous 3 months
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

João Martins Pisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

João Martins Pisco

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

João M Pisco, M.D,. Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital de Saint Louis

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital de Saint Louis

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Portugal

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pisco JM, Bilhim T, Costa NV, Torres D, Pisco J, Pinheiro LC, Oliveira AG. Randomised Clinical Trial of Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus a Sham Procedure for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):354-362. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.11.010. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31831295 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PAE-01-2013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.