Prostatic Artery Embolization Versus Medical Treatment in Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

NCT ID: NCT02869971

Last Updated: 2022-05-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-31

Study Completion Date

2022-03-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this trial is to compare the 9-month effect on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) using Embosphere® versus Standard Combined Therapy (alpha-blockers plus 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors) in patients with symptomatic BPH who failed after a first line medical treatment with alpha-blockers.

The secondary objectives of this study are to:

* Estimate the impact of the 2 strategies on benign prostatic hyperplasia specific Health Status (i.e. urinary and sexual signs and symptoms) at 3, 9, 18, and 24 months, as well as the side effects of the 2 strategies;
* Report the safety of PAE;
* Evaluate patient's adherence to medical treatment;
* Analyse the costs of each strategy and report the incremental efficiency (incremental cost utility ratio) of prostatic artery embolization compared to medical treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is the primary cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and affects \> 50% of men \>60 years. Moderate to severe symptoms prevalence is around 14% in France, and the proportion of men with moderate to severe symptoms doubles with each decade of age. The first-line treatment of bothersome BPH-related LUTS is medical therapy as recommended by French and European guidelines. 5α reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) can be combined with alpha-blockers and allow reduction of the size of the prostate and LUTS improvement. The severity of symptoms is usually assessed using the International prostate symptom score (IPSS) which is the standard questionnaire for the objective assessment of LUTS.

Recently, Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) has been proposed to treat symptomatic BPH with good safety and efficacy in single-centre studies (12-point IPSS reduction at 3 months maintained up to one year. In a randomized trial comparing PAE versus transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), Gao reported a 16-point IPSS reduction at 6 months, and an increase in the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) comprised between 12 ml/s and 24 ml/s at 6 months and up to 21 ml/s at 2 years. The complication rate is low (a few cases of bladder ulcer have been published) and the patient generally experiences mild post-embolization symptoms for few days.

PAE can be performed during a one-day hospitalisation and could be very attractive to patients which have insufficient benefit of medical treatment or who have side effects affecting their quality of life. The most used device for PAE is Embosphere® (Merit Medical). It bears the European CE (Conforme aux Exigences) marking for this specific indication and approximately 500 patients have been treated with it worldwide. Nonetheless, no big randomized study has proven its efficacy compared with best medical treatment. A study comparing PAE using Embosphere® and surgery (TURP) is currently enrolling patients; no patients could be included in France because men with BPH refused to be potentially assigned the surgical arm.

To properly evaluate PAE, the investigators designed the PARTEM trial, which has received the support of both the Societe Francaise de Radiologie (French society of radiology) and of the Association Francaise d'Urologie (French association of urology).

PARTEM will compare prospectively the benefit of PAE using Embosphere® to the benefit of combined medical treatment (Combodart®: Dutasteride 0.5mg Tamsulosin 0.4mg) at 9 months with an extended follow up at 24 months in order to evaluate the stability of results in both groups.

The investigators plan a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open label, parallel trial, comparing PAE to Combined Therapy (CT: alpha-blockers + 5-ARI treatment). Treatments will be allocated by minimization with a 1:1 ratio, based on study centre, IPSS score (moderate/severe) and prostate volume (\< 80 g/≥80 g).

This study is designed to demonstrate the superiority of PAE to decrease LUTS compared to best medical treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Embolization

Prostatic Arteries Embolization

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Embosphere® (Prostatic Arteries Embolization)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Prostatic Arteries Embolization with 300-500 µm trisacryl microspheres

Combined Therapy

Combodart® : dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin 0.4 mg per day

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Drug therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Combodart (dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin 0.4 mg)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Embosphere® (Prostatic Arteries Embolization)

Prostatic Arteries Embolization with 300-500 µm trisacryl microspheres

Intervention Type DEVICE

Drug therapy

Combodart (dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin 0.4 mg)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men aged\>= 50 and \<=85 years AND
* Moderate to severe LUTS defined as IPSS \> 11, and QoL \> 3 AND
* No improvement after an alpha blocker treatment line (Tamsulosin 0.4 mg p.d. during 1 month) AND
* Prostatic volume \>=50 ml AND
* Affiliated to a French health insurance system

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe allergy to iodine contrast agent
* Treatment with 5-ARI on the last 6 months
* Suspected prostate cancer requiring specific management
* On-going prostatitis
* On-going urinary retention
* On-going acute urinary infection
* Acontractile detrusor
* Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction
* Urethral stenosis
* Bladder diverticulum
* Bladder stone with surgical indication
* Patient refusing PAE
* Creatinine clearance \<40 ml/min
* Severe liver failure
* Contra-indication to alpha-blockers
* Hypersensitivity to dutasteride, other 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, tamsulosin (including case of tamsulosin induced angioedema), soya, peanut or one of the excipients
* Hypersensitivity to gelatin or collagen
* Patients ineligible for pelvic angiography
* History of orthostatic hypotension
* Patient unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent
* Patient under legal protection
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Health, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marc Sapoval, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Lyon hopital Edouard Herriot

Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France

Site Status

CHU de Lyon centre hospitalier Lyon Sud

Pierre-Bénite, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France

Site Status

CHU Rennes hopital Pontchaillou

Rennes, Brittany Region, France

Site Status

CHU de Bordeaux groupe hospitalier Pellegrin

Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France

Site Status

CHU de Limoges

Limoges, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France

Site Status

CHU Montpellier hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve

Montpellier, Occitanie, France

Site Status

CHU Montpellier hopital Lapeyronie

Montpellier, Occitanie, France

Site Status

AP-HM hopital la Conception

Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, France

Site Status

AP-HM hopital de la Timone

Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, France

Site Status

AP-HP hopital Henri-Mondor

Créteil, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

AP-HP - Hôpital Saint-Louis

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

AP-HP hopital Cochin

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

AP-HP Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sapoval M, Thiounn N, Descazeaud A, Dean C, Ruffion A, Pagnoux G, Duarte RC, Robert G, Petitpierre F, Karsenty G, Vidal V, Murez T, Vernhet-Kovacsik H, de la Taille A, Kobeiter H, Mathieu R, Heautot JF, Droupy S, Frandon J, Barry Delongchamps N, Korb-Savoldelli V, Durand-Zaleski I, Pereira H, Chatellier G; PARTEM study group. Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Jun 26;31:100672. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100672. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37415648 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PHRC-15-521

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2016-A00247-44

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P150917

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.