Prostatic Artery Embolization Versus Medical Treatment in Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT ID: NCT02869971
Last Updated: 2022-05-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-08-31
2022-03-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The secondary objectives of this study are to:
* Estimate the impact of the 2 strategies on benign prostatic hyperplasia specific Health Status (i.e. urinary and sexual signs and symptoms) at 3, 9, 18, and 24 months, as well as the side effects of the 2 strategies;
* Report the safety of PAE;
* Evaluate patient's adherence to medical treatment;
* Analyse the costs of each strategy and report the incremental efficiency (incremental cost utility ratio) of prostatic artery embolization compared to medical treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
NCT02930889
Prostate Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT03055624
Clinical Trial of Prostatic Arterial Embolization Versus a Sham Procedure to Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT02074644
Prostatic Artery Embolization vs. Pharmacotherapy for LUTS/BPH
NCT04245566
Prostate Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT03179228
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recently, Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) has been proposed to treat symptomatic BPH with good safety and efficacy in single-centre studies (12-point IPSS reduction at 3 months maintained up to one year. In a randomized trial comparing PAE versus transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), Gao reported a 16-point IPSS reduction at 6 months, and an increase in the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) comprised between 12 ml/s and 24 ml/s at 6 months and up to 21 ml/s at 2 years. The complication rate is low (a few cases of bladder ulcer have been published) and the patient generally experiences mild post-embolization symptoms for few days.
PAE can be performed during a one-day hospitalisation and could be very attractive to patients which have insufficient benefit of medical treatment or who have side effects affecting their quality of life. The most used device for PAE is Embosphere® (Merit Medical). It bears the European CE (Conforme aux Exigences) marking for this specific indication and approximately 500 patients have been treated with it worldwide. Nonetheless, no big randomized study has proven its efficacy compared with best medical treatment. A study comparing PAE using Embosphere® and surgery (TURP) is currently enrolling patients; no patients could be included in France because men with BPH refused to be potentially assigned the surgical arm.
To properly evaluate PAE, the investigators designed the PARTEM trial, which has received the support of both the Societe Francaise de Radiologie (French society of radiology) and of the Association Francaise d'Urologie (French association of urology).
PARTEM will compare prospectively the benefit of PAE using Embosphere® to the benefit of combined medical treatment (Combodart®: Dutasteride 0.5mg Tamsulosin 0.4mg) at 9 months with an extended follow up at 24 months in order to evaluate the stability of results in both groups.
The investigators plan a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open label, parallel trial, comparing PAE to Combined Therapy (CT: alpha-blockers + 5-ARI treatment). Treatments will be allocated by minimization with a 1:1 ratio, based on study centre, IPSS score (moderate/severe) and prostate volume (\< 80 g/≥80 g).
This study is designed to demonstrate the superiority of PAE to decrease LUTS compared to best medical treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Embolization
Prostatic Arteries Embolization
Embosphere® (Prostatic Arteries Embolization)
Prostatic Arteries Embolization with 300-500 µm trisacryl microspheres
Combined Therapy
Combodart® : dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin 0.4 mg per day
Drug therapy
Combodart (dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin 0.4 mg)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Embosphere® (Prostatic Arteries Embolization)
Prostatic Arteries Embolization with 300-500 µm trisacryl microspheres
Drug therapy
Combodart (dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin 0.4 mg)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Moderate to severe LUTS defined as IPSS \> 11, and QoL \> 3 AND
* No improvement after an alpha blocker treatment line (Tamsulosin 0.4 mg p.d. during 1 month) AND
* Prostatic volume \>=50 ml AND
* Affiliated to a French health insurance system
Exclusion Criteria
* Treatment with 5-ARI on the last 6 months
* Suspected prostate cancer requiring specific management
* On-going prostatitis
* On-going urinary retention
* On-going acute urinary infection
* Acontractile detrusor
* Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction
* Urethral stenosis
* Bladder diverticulum
* Bladder stone with surgical indication
* Patient refusing PAE
* Creatinine clearance \<40 ml/min
* Severe liver failure
* Contra-indication to alpha-blockers
* Hypersensitivity to dutasteride, other 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, tamsulosin (including case of tamsulosin induced angioedema), soya, peanut or one of the excipients
* Hypersensitivity to gelatin or collagen
* Patients ineligible for pelvic angiography
* History of orthostatic hypotension
* Patient unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent
* Patient under legal protection
50 Years
85 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ministry of Health, France
OTHER_GOV
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc Sapoval, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Lyon hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
CHU de Lyon centre hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
CHU Rennes hopital Pontchaillou
Rennes, Brittany Region, France
CHU de Bordeaux groupe hospitalier Pellegrin
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France
CHU de Limoges
Limoges, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France
CHU Montpellier hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier, Occitanie, France
CHU Montpellier hopital Lapeyronie
Montpellier, Occitanie, France
AP-HM hopital la Conception
Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, France
AP-HM hopital de la Timone
Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, France
AP-HP hopital Henri-Mondor
Créteil, Île-de-France Region, France
AP-HP - Hôpital Saint-Louis
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
AP-HP hopital Cochin
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
AP-HP Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sapoval M, Thiounn N, Descazeaud A, Dean C, Ruffion A, Pagnoux G, Duarte RC, Robert G, Petitpierre F, Karsenty G, Vidal V, Murez T, Vernhet-Kovacsik H, de la Taille A, Kobeiter H, Mathieu R, Heautot JF, Droupy S, Frandon J, Barry Delongchamps N, Korb-Savoldelli V, Durand-Zaleski I, Pereira H, Chatellier G; PARTEM study group. Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Jun 26;31:100672. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100672. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PHRC-15-521
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2016-A00247-44
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
P150917
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.