Towards HOMe-based Albuminuria Screening: an Implementation Study Testing Two Approaches
NCT ID: NCT04295889
Last Updated: 2022-04-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
15032 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-14
2022-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Screening for Albuminuria at the First Line for Early Identification of CKD
NCT05321095
Improving Albuminuria Screening Compliance Using a Smartphone Urinalysis Kit
NCT03470701
Maastricht Investigation of Renal Function in Absence of- and Post- Contrast in Patients With eGFR LEss Than 30
NCT04598516
Screen CardRen - A Cross-sectional Observational Cohort Study
NCT06272578
Check@Home: General Population Screening for Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT06330480
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It has been estimated that approximately 6% of the general population has elevated albuminuria, and that the majority of these subjects are not known yet with this abnormality. Among these subjects, many have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes and/or impaired kidney function, that often is also not known yet. Early detection of elevated albuminuria may be important because it gives the opportunity to invite subjects that test positive for further screening for CKD and CVD risk factors. Thus these risk factors for CKD and CVD progression could be treated in an early stage.
Population screening for albuminuria could be justified according to the WHO criteria of Wilson and Jungner , because CKD has important consequences for subjects, the course of the disease is initially symptomless, and there are treatment methods available. However, implementation research to validate screening the general population for albuminuria and related health consequences is lacking, as are cost-effectiveness studies.
In the current study the aim is to develop a home-based screening technique for detecting elevated albuminuria. Two screening methods will be investigated, and yield and cost-effectiveness of these screening methods will be evaluated
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Group A will receive an invitation for home based albuminuria screening using a more conventional urine collection device (known as "Peespot Test").
Approach A (PeeSpot urine collection device).
The participant will receive the PeeSpot urine collection device (Hessels+Grob B.V., Deventer, The Netherlands), which consists of a holder containing a urine collection pad (consisting of hygroscopic material containing). The holder can be placed back into the tube and can be easily sent to the laboratory by mail. In this urine, albumin, creatinine, and the ACR will be measured in the laboratory of the Amphia hospital.
Group B
Group B will receive an invitation for home based albuminuria screening using an app (internet application) and an ACR dipstick test (known as "ACR\| EU Test").
Approach B (ACR | EU Test kit).
The participant will receive the ACR \| EU test kit (Healthy.io Ltd, Tel-Aviv- Yafo, Israel), which consists of a urine test strip, a urine cup, a color calibrator and instruction to download a smartphone application. The participants have to download the smartphone application according to the instructions included in the kit. Results will be directly shown to the participant in the app.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Approach A (PeeSpot urine collection device).
The participant will receive the PeeSpot urine collection device (Hessels+Grob B.V., Deventer, The Netherlands), which consists of a holder containing a urine collection pad (consisting of hygroscopic material containing). The holder can be placed back into the tube and can be easily sent to the laboratory by mail. In this urine, albumin, creatinine, and the ACR will be measured in the laboratory of the Amphia hospital.
Approach B (ACR | EU Test kit).
The participant will receive the ACR \| EU test kit (Healthy.io Ltd, Tel-Aviv- Yafo, Israel), which consists of a urine test strip, a urine cup, a color calibrator and instruction to download a smartphone application. The participants have to download the smartphone application according to the instructions included in the kit. Results will be directly shown to the participant in the app.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Living in the municipality of Breda, The Netherlands.
* Not institutionalised.
Exclusion Criteria
* Not living in the municipality of Breda, The Netherlands.
* Institutionalised.
A random sample of 15.032 subjects will be drawn from the population aged 45-80 years from the municipality of Breda by the Dutch Central Bureau for Statistics (CBS).
45 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dutch Kidney Foundation
OTHER
E-Zorg B.V. / KPN Health
UNKNOWN
Healthy.io Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Hessels+Grob
UNKNOWN
Copernicus Interchange Technology B.V.
UNKNOWN
Amphia Hospital
OTHER
University Medical Center Groningen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
dr. R.T. Gansevoort
Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ron T Gansevoort, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Medical Center Groningen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Centre Groningen
Groningen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
van Mil D, Kieneker LM, Evers-Roeten B, Thelen MHM, de Vries H, Hemmelder MH, Dorgelo A, van Etten RW, Heerspink HJL, Gansevoort RT. Participation rate and yield of two home-based screening methods to detect increased albuminuria in the general population in the Netherlands (THOMAS): a prospective, randomised, open-label implementation study. Lancet. 2023 Sep 23;402(10407):1052-1064. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00876-0. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
van Mil D, Kieneker LM, Evers-Roeten B, Thelen MHM, de Vries H, Hemmelder MH, Dorgelo A, van Etten RW, Heerspink HJL, Gansevoort RT. Protocol for a randomized study assessing the feasibility of home-based albuminuria screening among the general population: The THOMAS study. PLoS One. 2022 Dec 22;17(12):e0279321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279321. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LSHM17076-SGF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.