Data on the Prevention of Complications of Prophylactic Intravenous Hydration in Patients With eGFR < 30

NCT ID: NCT04592406

Last Updated: 2023-01-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

443 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-01

Study Completion Date

2023-01-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

At Maastricht University Medical Centre (Maastricht UMC+) a specialised unit was established where a dual screening process including both renal and cardiac parameters is used to minimize the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury as well as the risk of prophylactic hydration in eGFR\<30mL/min/1.73m2 patients. Very little data exists on patients with eGFR \<30mL/min/1.73m2 in this context. The current study aims to describe post-contrast outcomes of patients to whom this screening method has been applied.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A large retrospective observational study, including 4-years of elective procedures with intravascular iodinated contrast administration in eGFR\<30mL/min/1.73m2 patients at Maastricht UMC+, found that prophylactic intravenous hydration might confer some benefit for renal function. For patients who had received prophylactic hydration, adjusted odds ratios for risk of post-contrast acute kidney injury, and 1-month eGFR decline and dialysis were all lower than 1. These results were not significant, but suggest that hydration may be protective. On the other hand, adjusted odds ratios for all-cause mortality within 1-month post-contrast were higher than 1, with point estimates indicating a trend toward higher risk of short-term mortality after prophylaxis as compared to no prophylaxis. Confounding by indication may be responsible for the observed increased risk of short-term mortality, but complications of the prophylaxis did contribute towards the risk. Amongst the 281 eGFR\<30mL/min/1.73m2 prophylaxis patients studied, 18 (6.4%) serious complications occurred: 3 arrhythmias, and 15 heart failures including 5 deaths. Of all 21 deaths recorded for the prophylaxis patients, 24% (5/21) were considered to be related to intravenous fluids. An exploration of differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without serious complications suggested that these can be avoided if cardiac function parameters are given extra and individual attention before deciding whether to administer prophylaxis to high-risk patients with eGFR\<30mL/min/1.73m2. At Maastricht UMC+ a specialised unit (called the CVP) was established where a dual screening process including both renal and cardiac parameters is used to minimize the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury as well as the risk of prophylactic hydration in eGFR\<30mL/min/1.73m2 patients. In order to enable real function follow-up, the CVP registers data on all patients with eGFR \<30 receiving intravascular iodinated contrast material, including acute patients who did not receive the dual screening process prior to prophylactic intravenous hydration. The current study aims to describe post-contrast outcomes of patients to whom the CVP screening method has been applied and to compare them to earlier outcomes of patients to whom the screening was not applied.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Kidney Injury (Nontraumatic) Contrast-induced Nephropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CVP screening

An appropriate dual screening process including both renal and cardiac parameters to minimize the risks of post-contrast renal adverse outcomes and of prophylactic hydration in eGFR\<30mL/min/1.73m2 patients.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m2 in absence of dialysis
* referred for a procedure with intravascular administration of iodinated contrast material at Maastricht UMC+

Exclusion Criteria

* age \<18 years
* dialysis or pre-dialysis
* emergency or intensive care status
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maastricht UMC

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL.MUMC.AMACINGrp.4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Preventing Acute Kidney Injury
NCT04376619 WITHDRAWN NA