Optimal Blood Sampling Site for Point of Care Lactate Assessment

NCT ID: NCT04291989

Last Updated: 2020-03-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-18

Study Completion Date

2019-03-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study was to compare blood Lactate levels between ear lobe and finger against venous forearm blood sample using the electronic hand held lactate device in hip fracture patients with good cognitive function (AMT \>/= 7)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Following a hip fracture, surgical treatment is advocated to improve pain and mobility. Most patients are elderly and a majority of them are frail. Current best practice tariff and National Institute for health and care excellence guidelines recommends that all those patients who undergo an operation should be performed within 36 hours from the time of injury to optimise recovery and function. The patients need to be medically optimised to undergo a major operation to have their hip fracture fixed. The adequacy of resuscitation is monitored by several clinical and biochemical markers. One of the important markers of resuscitation is serum lactate levels. This is used routinely in polytrauma patients. (Moran and Forward, 2012) The initial interest in lactate in hip fracture patients was based on the philosophy that a hip fracture in a frail elderly patient may be equivalent to a polytrauma in a young fit patient. Subsequently, high serum lactate levels on admission in hip fracture patients have been shown to be associated with higher mortality1. However, at present, this is not routinely monitored in hip fracture patients. Measurement of serum lactate levels presents logistics difficulties, as the blood sample has to be taken to an analyser and analysed within 20 minutes. Hence the investigators want to use a point of care electronic hand held device - the Lactate Pro 2. The investigators have already tested this device against the laboratory analysers and it has been proven to be accurate. However in preliminary testing the investigators found a significant difference between fingertip and earlobe samples in volunteers. The volunteers do not represent our population of interest, which are hip fracture patients. The investigators aim is to determine which sample site; earlobe or fingertip, for Lactate Pro 2 testing best matches venous forearm samples upon which the association of higher mortality with high lactate was based.

Any risk to the patients participating in this study would be very small. The inclusion criteria to participate in this research study is a patient who has had a recent hip fracture awaiting surgery with a Mental Test score of 7/10 or above and is able to consent.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blood Lactic Acid Increased Hip Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This study aims to compare lactate levels from the same patient at the same time with blood samples taken from three locations - fingertip, earlobe and forearm venepuncture
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Earlobe and Finger Prick versus venous blood lactate sampling

Compare blood Lactate levels between ear lobe and finger against venous forearm blood sample using the electronic hand held lactate device in hip fracture patients with good cognitive function (AMT \>/= 7)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Optimal Blood Sampling Site for Point of Care Lactate Assessment using the handled Lactate-Pro 2 device

Intervention Type DEVICE

This study aims to compare lactate levels using the Lactate Pro 2 device from the same patient at the same time with blood samples taken from three locations - fingertip, earlobe and forearm venepuncture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Optimal Blood Sampling Site for Point of Care Lactate Assessment using the handled Lactate-Pro 2 device

This study aims to compare lactate levels using the Lactate Pro 2 device from the same patient at the same time with blood samples taken from three locations - fingertip, earlobe and forearm venepuncture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
* Diagnosed with an acute hip fracture.
* Have a mental test score of 7/10 or greater on assessment during admission.
* Participant is willing to consent to the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* The participant will not enter the study if

1. There are Injuries other than isolated hip fracture
2. Age \<18 years
3. They are not willing to consent for the study
4. They have a mental test score less than 7/10 at the time of admission.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospitals, Leicester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GANAPATHY RAMAN R Perianayagam, FRCS (Orth)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospitals, Leicester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Leicester Royal Infirmary

Leicester, Please Select, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Edge I.D - 90666

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pre-hospital Tourniquet in Extremity Injury
NCT04216225 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Hematoma Block Versus Bier Block for Closed Fracture Reduction
NCT05086224 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1
Focused Registry SmartFix
NCT02094209 COMPLETED