The DBCG Proton Trial: Photon Versus Proton Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT04291378

Last Updated: 2020-10-08

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 1502 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2020-06-01
• Study Completion Date: 2037-06-01

Brief Summary

The majority of early breast cancer patients are treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) as part of their multimodal therapy. The aim of the RT is to lower the risk of local, regional and distant failure and improve survival. Modern RT is been provided with photon therapy. Now, more proton therapy facilities are opened, including in Denmark. Proton RT may have the potential to cause lower dose to heart and lung during breast RT. This trial will randomise patients between standard photon RT versus experimental proton RT. The primary endpoint is 10 year risk of heart disease.

Detailed Description

Adjuvant breast cancer radiation therapy (RT) is standard for all patients operated with breast conservation and for patients diagnosed with large tumours and/or node-positive disease. Around 65% of all breast cancer patients treated with RT have whole breast RT without nodal RT, whilst the remaining 35% are treated with loco-regional RT (target is breast / chest wall and regional nodal volumes). RT leads to fewer local and regional recurrences, a decrease in breast cancer death and improves overall survival. Since 2014, when the DBCG IMN study showed overall survival gain from internal mammary node (IMN) RT, IMN RT has been standard for all high-risk patients in Denmark. IMN RT causes a significant increase in dose to the heart and lung, thus heart and lung sparing RT techniques based on deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), volumetric arc therapy and tomotherapy are increasingly used to lower dose to heart and lung whilst maintaining dose to breast and nodal targets. These advanced techniques are used in all DBCG departments routinely. Despite using advanced RT techniques, some patients still receive high RT dose to heart and lung.

Proton therapy (PT) has not been widely used nor investigated for adjuvant breast cancer RT, because there are only few proton centres. However, due to the properties of PT it is possible to achieve optimal dose coverage of relevant targets and at the same time ensure low dose to organs at risk compared with photon RT. In an energy-dependent manner, PT will deposit the majority of its dose in tissue depths defined by the Bragg peak. In practice, this translates into i) the ability to deliver the peak energy to target volumes of irregular 3-dimensional shape using pencil-beam scanning technology, ii) a sharp dose fall-off following deposition of energy in the target and iii) reduction of the integral dose to the patient. Within millimeters, the exit dose drops off from 90% to 10%, resulting in the virtual absence of an exit dose. The effectiveness, safety and feasibility of PT has been reported in few small cohort studies with limited follow up, and there is a lack of clinically controlled randomised trials documenting benefit from PT, evaluated either as higher tumour control and/or as fewer morbidities.

This trial tests standard photon RT versus experimental proton RT for selected early breast cancer patients.

Conditions

Early Breast Cancer; Radiation Associated Cardiac Failure

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Photon radiation therapy

The patient is treated with standard radiation therapy based on photons

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Proton versus photon radiation therapy

Intervention Type: RADIATION

The intervention is proton radiation therapy versus photon radiation therapy

Proton radiation therapy

The patient is treated with experimental radiation therapy based on protons

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Proton versus photon radiation therapy

Intervention Type: RADIATION

The intervention is proton radiation therapy versus photon radiation therapy

Interventions

Proton versus photon radiation therapy

The intervention is proton radiation therapy versus photon radiation therapy

Intervention Type: RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patient operated for early breast cancer with indication for radiation therapy, where standard planning shows a mean heart dose 4 Gy or more and/or a V20 lung of 37% or more.
• Boost (breast, chest wall and nodal), breast reconstruction (any type, except implants with metal), connective tissue disease, post-operative surgical complications, any breast size and seromas are allowed
• Patient with previous non-breast malignancy is accepted if the patient has been without disease minimum 5 years, and the treating oncologist estimates a low risk of recurrence.
• Life expectancy minimum 10 years

Exclusion Criteria

• previous breast cancer/ductal carcinoma in situ,
• Previous RT to the chest region
• Pregnant or lactating
• Conditions indicating that the patient cannot go through the RT or follow up
• Patients with Pacemaker or defibrillator are excluded until a guideline for handling them has been developed at the DCPT
• Unknown non-tissue implants upstream of the target volume. NB. all such non-tissue, non-metal objects must be delivered to the DCPT for stopping power determination and evaluation at least a week prior to radiation start.
• Metal implants in the radiation area, including metal in implants.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Birgitte Offersen

Professor, phd

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Birgitte V Offersen, phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Danish Breast cancer Cooperation Group (DBCG)

Locations

Aalborg University Hospital

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status: RECRUITING

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status: RECRUITING

The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status: RECRUITING

Herlev Hospital

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status: RECRUITING

Naestved Hospital

Næstved, , Denmark

Site Status: RECRUITING

Odense University Hospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status: RECRUITING

Vejle Hospital

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Denmark

Central Contacts

Birgitte V Offersen, phd

Role: CONTACT

birgoffe@rm.dk

+45 28838012

Morten Høyer, phd

Role: CONTACT

morthoey@rm.dk

+45 23282823

Facility Contacts

Lars Stenbygaard, MD

Role: primary

Hanne M Nielsen, PhD

Role: primary

Birgitte Offersen, MD, phd

Role: primary

Claus Kamby, DMSc

Role: primary

Susanne Vallentin

Role: primary

Sami Al-Rawi, MD

Role: primary

Mette H Nielsen, PhD

Role: primary

Troels Bechmann, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

DBCG Proton trial

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id