Early Cardiac Toxicity of Adjuvant CT in Elderly BC.

NCT ID: NCT01301040

Last Updated: 2013-08-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective is to evaluate the difference in cardiac strain rate evolution in elderly early BC patients treated with (neo) adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy compared with a non-anthracycline regimen (Taxotere-cyclophosphamide) CT.

This study also will compare the serum biomarkers profile during and after the (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, assess whether MRI allows detecting earlier than standard echocardiography the signs of cardiotoxicity, during and after adjuvant (neo) CT, assess whether brain PET-CT allows detecting regional functional impairment in patients receiving CT, evaluate cognitive function before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate distress and functional autonomy before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate psychological state and burden of primary caregivers before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate primary caregivers abilities to detect patients' distress and functional autonomy before and after (neo) adjuvant CT in both treatment arms, evaluate the short and long-term toxicity profile of the regimens, estimate the 10-year risk of relapse and/or death using the Adjuvant!Online tool, and estimate the Framingham risk score for Hard Coronary Heart Disease (10-year risk).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Considering that both anthracycline-based and Taxotere-cyclophosphamide CT have established efficacy in the adjuvant treatment of elderly patients with early breast cancer, and the paucity of data for early cardiac toxicities with anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy compared to non-anthracycline regimen, this is the first randomized study to evaluate early cardiac signs based on doppler myocardial imaging (DMI). The results of this study could improve the monitoring of the cardiac function of elderly patients candidates to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

breast cancer, elderly, early cardiac toxicity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide

Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

* Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
* Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

docetaxel/cyclophosphamide

Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (Taxotere) (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

* Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
* Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel

* Treatment arm 1: EC - epirubicin (100mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
* Treatment Arm 2: TC - docetaxel (75mg/m2 IV) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 IV) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Docetaxel: Taxotere Cyclophosphamide: Endoxan Epirubicin: Epirubicin Teva

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient selection criteria

* Female aged equal or more than 65 years.
* Histological diagnosis of early BC for which the treating physician considers (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy to be beneficial. Recommended situations are:
* Triple negative BC if pT \> 1cm.
* HER-2 positive BC if pT1 \> 1cm; and trastuzumab will be given after study chemotherapy.
* "Luminal B" cancers defined as ER+, PgR + or neg, Ki-67 ≥ 14%, and pT1 \> 1cm.
* "Luminal A" cancers (ER+, PgR+ and Ki-67 \< 14%) will be considered only if ≥ 4 nodes.
* Poor response to a preoperative endocrine therapy.
* WHO performance status equal or less than 1.
* Baseline LVEF equal or more than 50% measured by echocardiography.
* Adequate organ function including:
* neutrophils more or equal to 1.5 x 109/L.
* platelets more or equal to100 x 109/L.
* bilirubin \< 1.25 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for the institution.
* transaminases: AST \< 2.5 x ULN , ALT \< 2.5 x ULN and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x ULN for the institution.
* Estimated creatinine clearance \> 30ml/min (using the Crockoft and Gault formula) (See Appendix E) .
* No previous exposure to chemotherapy in this neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting.
* No serious cardiac illness or medical conditions as judged by the investigator including, but not confined to:Symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias,Clinical and/or ECG evidence of myocardial infarction within the last 12 months,Coronary artery disease requiring medication,High-risk uncontrolled arrhythmias,Poorly controlled hypertension (e.g. systolic \>180 mm Hg or diastolic \>100 mm Hg).
* Other concurrent serious diseases that may interfere with planned treatment including severe pulmonary conditions/illness.
* No participation to other clinical trials involving therapeutic agents within the 6 weeks prior to the randomization.
* No prior or concurrent diagnosis of cancer, except for adequately treated basocellular and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical uterine in situ tumor
* Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial.
* Signed written informed consent must be given according to ICH-GCP and national/local regulations, prior to any study specific screening procedures and randomization.
2. Caregiver selection criteria

* to be identified by participating patients as their primary caregivers i.e the person who helps them the most to cope with cancer in their everyday life
* to be at least eighteen years old
* to be aware of the cancer diagnosis of the patients to be fit enough to complete the questionnaires
* to be French speaking
* to be free of any cognitive dysfunction.
* to give their written informed consent as regards participation in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanofi

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jules Bordet Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lissandra Dal Lago, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jules Bordet Institute

Evandro De Azambuja, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jules Bordet Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institut Jules Bordet

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-000562-35

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IJB 11-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id