Treatment of Anterior Blepharitis With Microblepharoexfoliation Procedure
NCT ID: NCT04290455
Last Updated: 2021-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-02
2020-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of BlephEx to MiBoflo as Treatment Options for Blepharitis
NCT02952079
Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of NCX 4251 Ophthalmic Suspension for the Treatment of Blepharitis
NCT04675242
The Effects of Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution, 1% Versus Placebo in Subjects With Blepharitis During a Two-Week Treatment Period
NCT00892970
Efficacy of Over the Counter (OTC) Povidone-Ioldine 5% for Treatment of Acute or Chronic Blepharitis
NCT01560962
The Effects of Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution, 1% Versus Placebo in Subjects With Blepharitis During a Four-Week Treatment Period (P08638)
NCT00894530
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One of the patients' eyes will be simply randomized into the interventional group in which the BlephExTM device(1) will be used to perform eyelid margin and lash cleansing. The other eye will be entered into the control group in which eyelid cleansing in a conventional way will be done using Optase wipes. In the screening visit, the Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire score and eyelid contamination will be assessed to recruit eligible patients. Before eyelid cleansing, images of the eyelid margin will be obtained by Oculus Keratograph 5M, Wetzlar, Germany and will be used to grade lashes contamination and lid margin redness by two independent observers. Parameters of interest of each eye will be evaluated separately. The primary outcomes are symptoms which will be scored using the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness Questionnaire (SPEED)(2) and lashes contamination which will be graded as described above. Other outcomes of interest are lid margin redness, and the number of preservative free artificial tears used per day. The lid margin redness is graded as 0=Clear/white 1=Slight redness 2=Mild redness 3=Moderate redness 4=Severe redness. Patients will also be evaluated for concurrent meibomian gland dysfunction by evaluating meibum quality and expressibility of meibomian glands according to the International Workshop on Meibomian Gland dysfunction 2011(3). Meibum quality is assessed in each of eight glands of the central third of the lower lid on a scale of 0 to 3 for each gland: 0, clear; 1, cloudy; 2, cloudy with debris (granular); and 3, thick, like toothpaste (total score range, 0-24). Expressibility is assessed on a scale of 0 to 3 in five glands in the lower or upper lid, according to the number of glands expressible: 0, all glands; 1, three to four glands; 2, one to two glands; and 3, no glands. Patients who have minimally altered secretion grade ≥ 2-4 and expressibility ≥ 1 will be diagnosed with MGD. The images of eyelids will be taken again immediately after eyelid cleansing and eyelid contamination scores will be evaluated. The patient will then be instructed to perform lid cleansing at home once a day with eyelid cleansing wipes (Optase) for 21 days. The technique will be demonstrated to the patient in clinic. The follow-up visits will be at 21 days. At the follow-up visit, all of the data obtained in the screening visit will be repeated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
treatment arm
using the microblepharoexfoliative procedure
Microblepharoexfoliative procedure with BlephEx™
The device will be used to clean both upper and lower eyelid in the office visit.
Daily eyelid cleansing with eyelid wipes (Optase)
Patients in both arms will be instructed to do self-eyelid cleansing with eyelid wipes (Optase) daily at home for 21 days
control arm
using eyelid wipe (Optase)
Eyelid cleansing with eyelid wipes (Optase)
Eyelid cleansing will be done with eyelid wipes (Optase) by one clinician
Daily eyelid cleansing with eyelid wipes (Optase)
Patients in both arms will be instructed to do self-eyelid cleansing with eyelid wipes (Optase) daily at home for 21 days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Microblepharoexfoliative procedure with BlephEx™
The device will be used to clean both upper and lower eyelid in the office visit.
Eyelid cleansing with eyelid wipes (Optase)
Eyelid cleansing will be done with eyelid wipes (Optase) by one clinician
Daily eyelid cleansing with eyelid wipes (Optase)
Patients in both arms will be instructed to do self-eyelid cleansing with eyelid wipes (Optase) daily at home for 21 days
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with concurrent conjunctivitis or keratopathy will also be excluded.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Saba K. Al-Hashimi, MD
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stein Eye Institute, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ngo W, Situ P, Keir N, Korb D, Blackie C, Simpson T. Psychometric properties and validation of the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness questionnaire. Cornea. 2013 Sep;32(9):1204-10. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318294b0c0.
Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Bron AJ, Glasgow BJ, Dogru M, Tsubota K, Lemp MA, Sullivan DA. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):1922-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997a. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-000084
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.