Bone Pain in Multiple Myeloma- a Translational Study

NCT ID: NCT04273425

Last Updated: 2022-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-23

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

While the survival expectancy of myeloma patients continues increasing due to the discovery of novel treatments, bone pain remains one of the main symptoms of this patient population, impairing their mood and quality of life.

The aim of this study is to characterize the subjective experience of pain in myeloma patients, and its correlation with disturbances in serum biomarkers and bone innervation.

Primary research questions:

How is the bone pain experienced by myeloma patients (intensity, location and type of pain) and how does it affect their quality of life?

Do myeloma cells induce changes in the density and/or location of nerve fibres innervating the bone, and if so, are these correlated to the pain experience?

Secondary research questions:

Are the alterations in the bone innervation of myeloma patients similar to those of immunocompetent animal models of the disease (the 5TGM1 model)?

Is serum paraprotein correlated with the subjective experience of myeloma-induced bone pain?

Are the bone turnover biomarkers (C-terminal telopeptides Type 1 collagen, CTX, and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide, P1NP) and inflammatory serum biomarkers correlated with the subjective experience of myeloma-induced bone pain?

Do myeloma cells affect the location, number or density of bone cells (e.g. osteoblasts, osteoclasts)?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients undergoing diagnostic procedures (i.e. trephine bone biopsy) for suspected multiple myeloma will be invited to participate in the study, and provided with time to consider their participation.

Patients who consent will be provided with a set of seven standardized questionnaires assessing their pain, quality of life and catastrophizing. Additionally, patients will be asked to fill in demographic information.

Consenting patients will be asked to donate a fasting blood sample and give permission to the research team to retrieve their triphane bone biopsy, once the medical team has finished evaluating it. The presence, location and density of nerve fibres innervating the bone will be evaluated. Patients will also be consented to allow retrieval of medical information from their medical records, and correlations between serum biomarkers, disturbances in bone innervation, paraprotein levels, etc. and their self-reported experience of pain will be investigated. Patients with a negative diagnosis for multiple myeloma (expectably monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) patients) will be used as negative controls.

Patients who receive a positive diagnosis for multiple myeloma will be asked to fill in the same set of questionnaires upon completion of the first-line treatment (approximately 7 to 8 months after baseline assessment). Fasting serum blood samples will be collected. To evaluate treatment“s success, it is common medical practice to extract a new trephine bone biopsy upon completion of first line treatment. The research team will access these biopsies and evaluate the presence, density and location of nerve fibres in bone. Changes in nerve fibre profiles, serum biomarkers and the self-reported experience of pain, quality of life and catastrophizing following first-line treatment will be evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study cohort (Confirmed myeloma patients)

Patients with suspected multiple myeloma will be recruited. They will be asked to fill in questionnaires (regarding pain, quality of life, catastrophizing), donate serum samples and allow the research team to access their clinical data and their diagnostic bone biopsy.

Those who receive a positive diagnosis will be followed up upon completion of first-line treatment, and questionnaire data and blood samples collected again.

No interventions assigned to this group

Control cohort (non-confirmed myeloma patients)

Patients with suspected multiple myeloma will be recruited. They will be asked to fill in questionnaires (regarding pain, quality of life, catastrophizing), donate serum samples and allow the research team to access their clinical data and their diagnostic bone biopsy.

Samples from patients who receive a negative myeloma diagnosis will be used as negative controls.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 18 years or older
* Undergoing diagnostic procedures for suspected myeloma (no previous treatment for this)
* Patients who are local to Sheffield (or who are local to any other institute that may join in collaboration)
* Must be able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient who are unable to give consent
* Patients who do not speak English
* Patients who are too unwell to be recruited
* Patients who have had recent chemotherapy for different malignancy
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew D Chantry, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Royal Hallamshire Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Royal Hallamshire Hospital

Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Diaz-delCastillo M, Andrews RE, Mandal A, Andersen TL, Chantry AD, Heegaard AM. Bone Pain in Multiple Myeloma (BPMM)-A Protocol for a Prospective, Longitudinal, Observational Study. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 30;13(7):1596. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071596.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33808348 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STH20993

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Myeloma Treatment in Real Life
NCT03638232 COMPLETED
Autologous Transplant for Multiple Myeloma
NCT00177047 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3