Denosumab Compared to Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Bone Disease in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

NCT ID: NCT01345019

Last Updated: 2022-11-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1718 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-05-17

Study Completion Date

2019-03-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if denosumab is non-inferior to zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone disease from multiple myeloma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Hematologic Malignancies Multiple Myeloma Oncology Bone Metastases Multiple Myeloma Bone Lesions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Zoledronic acid

Zoledronic acid 4 mg intravenously plus placebo to denosumab subcutaniously (SC) once every 4 weeks (Q4W) in the double-blind treatment period (Since denosumab was determined to have a positive benefit:risk profile in the primary analysis of the study, per protocol, participants who were still undergoing Q4W scheduled assessments were offered open-label denosumab 120 mg SC Q4W for up to 2 years)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Zoledronic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered by intravenous infusion over 15 minutes once every 4 weeks

Placebo to Denosumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks.

Denosumab (for the open-label treatment phase)

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks.

Denosumab

Denosumab 120 mg subcutaniously (SC) plus placebo to zoledronic acid intravenously once every 4 weeks (Q4W) in the double-blind treatment period (Since denosumab was determined to have a positive benefit:risk profile in the primary analysis of the study, per protocol, participants who were still undergoing Q4W scheduled assessments were offered open-label denosumab 120 mg SC Q4W for up to 2 years)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Denosumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks.

Placebo to zoledronic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered by intravenous infusion over 15 minutes once every 4 weeks

Denosumab (for the open-label treatment phase)

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Denosumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Zoledronic acid

Administered by intravenous infusion over 15 minutes once every 4 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to Denosumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to zoledronic acid

Administered by intravenous infusion over 15 minutes once every 4 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Denosumab (for the open-label treatment phase)

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

XGEVA® AMG 162 Zometa® XGEVA® AMG 162

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Documented evidence of multiple myeloma (per local assessment):
* Monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow greater than or equal to 10% and/or presence of a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma, and
* Monoclonal protein present in the serum and/or urine
* Radiographic (X-ray, or computer tomography \[CT\]) evidence of at least 1 lytic bone lesion (or at least 1 focal lesion per magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\])
* Plan to receive or is receiving primary frontline anti-myeloma therapies
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Adequate organ function, as defined by the following criteria (per central or local laboratory values):

* Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 2.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Serum alanine aminotransferase ≤ (ALT) 2.0 x ULN
* Serum total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 x ULN
* Creatinine clearance ≥ 30 mL/min
* Serum calcium or albumin-adjusted serum calcium 2.0 mmol/L (8.0 mg/dL) and 2.9 mmol/L (11.5 mg/dL)
* Written informed consent before any study-specific procedure is performed

Exclusion Criteria

* Nonsecretory multiple myeloma based upon standard M-component criteria (ie, measurable serum/urine M-component) unless the baseline serum free light chain level is elevated
* POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes)
* Plasma cell leukemia
* More than 30 days of previous treatment (before screening) with anti-myeloma therapy (does not include radiotherapy or a single short course of steroid \[ie, less than or equal to the equivalent of dexamethasone 60 mg/day for 4 days\]).
* Planned radiation therapy or surgery to the bone (does not include procedures performed before randomization)
* Prior administration of denosumab
* Use of oral bisphosphonates with a cumulative exposure of more than 1 year
* More than 1 previous dose of IV bisphosphonate administration
* Prior history or current evidence of osteonecrosis/osteomyelitis of the jaw
* Active dental or jaw condition which requires oral surgery, including tooth extraction
* Non-healed dental/oral surgery, including tooth extraction
* Planned invasive dental procedures
* Evidence of any of the following conditions per subject self-report or medical chart review:

* Any prior invasive malignancy within 5 years before randomization
* Any non-invasive malignancy not treated with curative intent or with knownactive disease within 5 years before randomization
* Major surgery or significant traumatic injury occurring within 4 weeks before randomization
* Active infection with Hepatitis B virus or Hepatitis C virus
* Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
* Active infection requiring IV anti-infective therapy
* Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant within 5 months after end of treatment
* Female subject of child bearing potential is not willing to use highly effective contraception during treatment and for 5 months after the end of treatment (see section 6.3)
* Known sensitivity to any of the products to be administered during the study (eg, mammalian derived products, calcium or vitamin D)
* Subject is receiving or is less than 30 days since ending other experimental device or drug (no marketing authorization for any indication)
* Subject will not be available for follow-up assessment
* Any major medical or psychiatric disorder that in the opinion of the investigator, might prevent the subject from completing the study or interfere with the interpretation of the study results
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Campbell, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pleasant Hill, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Joliet, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Niles, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Anderson, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ames, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Scarborough, Maine, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Westminster, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Danvers, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fairhaven, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

North Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Goldsboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Aberdeen, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Watertown, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Christiansburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Minocqua, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Tweed Heads, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Douglas, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Epping, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Malvern, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Krems, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Wels, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrava-Poruba, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Avignon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lyon Cédex 3, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nice, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Pontoise, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Reims, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Saint-Quentin, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Villefranche-sur-Saône, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Chemnitz, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Kassel, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Heraklion, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Pátrai, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Piraeus, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Research Site

New Territories, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Research Site

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Research Site

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Research Site

Limerick, , Ireland

Site Status

Research Site

Tullamore, , Ireland

Site Status

Research Site

Ancona, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Busto Arsizio, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Messina, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Novara, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Palermo, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Pescara, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Rozzano MI, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Udine, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Vimercate MB, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Akita, Akita, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kamogawa-shi, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Gifu, Gifu, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Ogaki-shi, Gifu, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Maebashi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Shibukawa-shi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Fukuyama-shi, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Okayama, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Toyama, Toyama, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Research Site

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Research Site

Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Ampang, , Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Research Site

Grafton, Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Research Site

Legnica, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Słupsk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Braga, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Matosinhos Municipality, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Dzerzhinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Penza, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Petrozavodsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Volgograd, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Research Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Research Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Research Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Nové Zámky, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Anyang, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Daejeon, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Gwangju, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Donostia / San Sebastian, Basque Country, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Salamanca, Castille and León, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Badalona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Ourense, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Chur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Adana, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Cherkasy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Khmelnitskiy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Poltava, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Harrow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Inverness, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Bulgaria Canada Czechia France Germany Greece Hong Kong Hungary Ireland Italy Japan Lithuania Malaysia New Zealand Poland Portugal Russia Singapore Slovakia South Korea Spain Switzerland Taiwan Turkey (Türkiye) Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Raje N, Roodman GD, Willenbacher W, Shimizu K, Garcia-Sanz R, Terpos E, Kennedy L, Sabatelli L, Intorcia M, Hechmati G. A cost-effectiveness analysis of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma in the United States of America. J Med Econ. 2018 May;21(5):525-536. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1445634. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29480139 (View on PubMed)

Raje N, Terpos E, Willenbacher W, Shimizu K, Garcia-Sanz R, Durie B, Legiec W, Krejci M, Laribi K, Zhu L, Cheng P, Warner D, Roodman GD. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in bone disease treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):370-381. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30072-X. Epub 2018 Feb 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29429912 (View on PubMed)

Huang SY, Yoon SS, Shimizu K, Chng WJ, Chang CS, Wong RS, Gao S, Wang Y, Gordon SW, Glennane A, Min CK. Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in Bone Disease Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: An International, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Study-Asian Subgroup Analysis. Adv Ther. 2020 Jul;37(7):3404-3416. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01395-x. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32524500 (View on PubMed)

Terpos E, Raje N, Croucher P, Garcia-Sanz R, Leleu X, Pasteiner W, Wang Y, Glennane A, Canon J, Pawlyn C. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid on PFS in multiple myeloma: exploratory results of an international phase 3 study. Blood Adv. 2021 Feb 9;5(3):725-736. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002378.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33560384 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-020454-34

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

20090482

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.