Prospective Registration of mOrbidity and Mortality, individUal radioSensitivity and Radiation Technique (PROUST)
NCT ID: NCT04253288
Last Updated: 2020-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-29
2025-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Quality of radiotherapy (RT) delivery is highly operator dependent. The operator is a team of professionals including radiation oncologists, planning dosimetrists, physicists and technicians. Because of this complex, multi-step process, there is margin for error, which may affect outcomes and toxicity. Some deviations may have minimal effects on outcome, while others may have a profound effect and compromise long-term results. For the morbidity after RT, MMR is identified as one of the most adapted process to highlight whether and how these meetings provide assurance within the organizations' governance processes in radiation departments.
In France, many teams have not reached a formalized procedure for a systematic MMR. Furthermore, implementation of MMR in RT departments is very heterogeneous and not always meets the criteria defined by the Health Authorities (HAS) (6).
Systemic analysis conducted during the MMR is a comprehensive analysis of the situation, taking into account all technical and human elements. The diagnosis and type of morbidity depends on the irradiated volume, the dose delivered to the organ at risk and the individual radiosensitivity.
Follow-up after RT is important to evaluate outcome results and late toxicity. In general, late effects consist of tissue fibrosis and vascular damage, which can result in cosmetic and functional deterioration. Some of the radiation-induced sequelea may require particular management including hospitalization (lung fibrosis, gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary toxicities,..), while for other ones, only local treatments are needed (mucosal toxicity, skin fibrosis…). The challenge for clinicians in the frame of the MMR is to make sure that there is no controversy about the delivered RT quality and investigate other potential causes such as particular intrinsic radiosensitivity of the patient for a given standard treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating Patient Reported Outcomes in Radiation Therapy, the PRO-RT Study
NCT05224271
Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer With SIB
NCT06831903
Remote Monitoring of Patient Reported Outcomes to Improve the Efficacy of the Acute Phase Radiotherapy Review Process
NCT06274892
Evaluation of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as a Bridge Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Enlisted for Liver Transplantation
NCT06218420
Interest of a Weekly Consultation by a Medical Electro Radiology Manipulator (MERM) in Addition to the Follow-up by the Radiotherapist to Improve the Collection of Radio-induced Toxicities in Patients Undergoing Proton Therapy
NCT05404308
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with severe radiation toxicity
Patients who received radiotherapy and developed abnormal radiation-induced toxicity
Morbidity Mortality Review (MMR)
* Standardization of Morbidity Mortality Review (MMR) in radiotherapy centers
* National database from MMR board meetings which include clinical , radiation technique and biological parameters of intrinsic radiosensitivity of patients
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Morbidity Mortality Review (MMR)
* Standardization of Morbidity Mortality Review (MMR) in radiotherapy centers
* National database from MMR board meetings which include clinical , radiation technique and biological parameters of intrinsic radiosensitivity of patients
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who received RT alone or associated to other anti-cancer treatments
* Significant and durable toxicity grade \> 3 whatever the organs concerned by radiation exposure
* Completion of baseline clinical and dosimetric data collection
* Patients with no psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule
* Signed informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from patients after they have been fully informed on the nature and interest to investigated radiosensitivity by the investigator.
Exclusion Criteria
* No clinical and/or dosimetric available data
* No quality of life questionnaire completion whatever the cause
* Patients who do not agree to have at least one of the planed biologic tests, namely, skin biopsy and blood samples.
* Absence of affiliation to National French social security system
* Patient deprived of freedom or under legal protection (guardianship,curatorship)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yazid BELKACEMI, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
K160101J
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.