Prospective Registration of mOrbidity and Mortality, individUal radioSensitivity and Radiation Technique (PROUST)

NCT ID: NCT04253288

Last Updated: 2020-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-29

Study Completion Date

2025-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Recently, an increasing international interest has arisen in using morbidity and mortality rates to monitor the quality of hospital cares (1, 2). Many hospitals have integrated the morbidity and mortality review (MMR) meetings into their governance processes, by making them mandatory and more accountable for taking corrective action (3-5).

Quality of radiotherapy (RT) delivery is highly operator dependent. The operator is a team of professionals including radiation oncologists, planning dosimetrists, physicists and technicians. Because of this complex, multi-step process, there is margin for error, which may affect outcomes and toxicity. Some deviations may have minimal effects on outcome, while others may have a profound effect and compromise long-term results. For the morbidity after RT, MMR is identified as one of the most adapted process to highlight whether and how these meetings provide assurance within the organizations' governance processes in radiation departments.

In France, many teams have not reached a formalized procedure for a systematic MMR. Furthermore, implementation of MMR in RT departments is very heterogeneous and not always meets the criteria defined by the Health Authorities (HAS) (6).

Systemic analysis conducted during the MMR is a comprehensive analysis of the situation, taking into account all technical and human elements. The diagnosis and type of morbidity depends on the irradiated volume, the dose delivered to the organ at risk and the individual radiosensitivity.

Follow-up after RT is important to evaluate outcome results and late toxicity. In general, late effects consist of tissue fibrosis and vascular damage, which can result in cosmetic and functional deterioration. Some of the radiation-induced sequelea may require particular management including hospitalization (lung fibrosis, gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary toxicities,..), while for other ones, only local treatments are needed (mucosal toxicity, skin fibrosis…). The challenge for clinicians in the frame of the MMR is to make sure that there is no controversy about the delivered RT quality and investigate other potential causes such as particular intrinsic radiosensitivity of the patient for a given standard treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study consist of a prospective registration in a dedicated database (PROUST) of severe radiation toxicity that aims to implement MMR procedure in the French radiotherapy departments.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radiotherapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with severe radiation toxicity

Patients who received radiotherapy and developed abnormal radiation-induced toxicity

Group Type OTHER

Morbidity Mortality Review (MMR)

Intervention Type OTHER

* Standardization of Morbidity Mortality Review (MMR) in radiotherapy centers
* National database from MMR board meetings which include clinical , radiation technique and biological parameters of intrinsic radiosensitivity of patients

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Morbidity Mortality Review (MMR)

* Standardization of Morbidity Mortality Review (MMR) in radiotherapy centers
* National database from MMR board meetings which include clinical , radiation technique and biological parameters of intrinsic radiosensitivity of patients

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

National database from MMR

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Patients who received RT alone or associated to other anti-cancer treatments
* Significant and durable toxicity grade \> 3 whatever the organs concerned by radiation exposure
* Completion of baseline clinical and dosimetric data collection
* Patients with no psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule
* Signed informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from patients after they have been fully informed on the nature and interest to investigated radiosensitivity by the investigator.

Exclusion Criteria

* No formal MMR meeting in the center where the patient has been treated
* No clinical and/or dosimetric available data
* No quality of life questionnaire completion whatever the cause
* Patients who do not agree to have at least one of the planed biologic tests, namely, skin biopsy and blood samples.
* Absence of affiliation to National French social security system
* Patient deprived of freedom or under legal protection (guardianship,curatorship)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yazid BELKACEMI, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yazid BELKACEMI, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

(0)149814522 ext. + 33

David SCHMITZ

Role: CONTACT

(0) 1 49 81 36 24 ext. + 33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

K160101J

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.