Intravenous Metoclopramide Versus Dexketoprofen Trometamol Versus Metoclopramide+ Dexketoprofen Trometamol in Migraine

NCT ID: NCT04252521

Last Updated: 2024-02-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-03

Study Completion Date

2020-01-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute headache is one of the most common reasons for presentation to the emergency department (ED), accounting for 2-3% of all emergency visits. Migraine is a disorder of the central nervous system characterized by a moderate or severe headache, which is generally associated with nausea and/or sensitivity to light and sound, interfering with daily activities.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study objective: The objective of this study is to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous, single-dose metoclopramide versus dexketoprofen trometamol versus metoclopramide+ dexketoprofen trometamol in patients presenting with acute migraine attack to the emergency department (ED).

Methods of Measurements:

This single-center, randomized, double-blind study will be conducted in a tertiary care ED. Eligible patients who met the migraine criteria of the International Headache Society will be randomized to receive 10 mg intravenous metoclopramide, 50 mg intravenous dexketoprofen trometamol, or 50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol + 10 mg metoclopramide.

Subjects reported pain intensity on both a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (limited by 'no pain' and 'the worst pain') will be used for pain measurement at baseline, after 15 and 30 min. The primary outcome measure is the changes in the VAS scores at the 15th and 30th minutes of treatment. The secondary outcome measures are the presence of adverse effects and the requirement of rescue medicine.

Primary Data Analysis:

The study was planned as a superiority trial. The difference in the VAS values between the groups was assumed to detect 21.4 mm and the standard deviation (SD) value as 2.8 mm, and thus the minimum required the number of patients for each group was calculated as 27 at the alpha-critical value of 0.05 and power of 80%. All the analyses were implemented according to the intention to treat analysis. Differences between time intervals within groups and between groups and statistical significance were expressed by 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Migraine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

metoclopramide+ dexketoprofen trometamol

10 mg metoclopramide+ 50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

metoclopramide+dexketoprofen trometamol

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mg metoclopramide+50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol in 100 ml normal saline solution

metoclopramide

10 mg metoclopramide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

metoclopramide

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mg Metpamid in 100 ml normal saline solution

dexketoprofen trometamol

50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dexketoprofen trometamol

Intervention Type DRUG

50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol in 100 ml normal saline solution

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

metoclopramide

10 mg Metpamid in 100 ml normal saline solution

Intervention Type DRUG

dexketoprofen trometamol

50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol in 100 ml normal saline solution

Intervention Type DRUG

metoclopramide+dexketoprofen trometamol

10 mg metoclopramide+50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol in 100 ml normal saline solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Metpamid (metoclopramide) Metadem (dexketoprofen trometamol) Metpamid+Metadem

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

-Patients aged 18 and over with acute headache who met the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Association (9) for the diagnosis of migraine

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who refused to participate in the study
* Patients that took any analgesic medication within six hours before presentation to ED Patients with any additional organic pathology (e.g., hypertension, hypoglycemia, chronic kidney failure, and intracranial masses) pregnant women hemodynamically unstable patients patients with an allergy to the drugs used in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Adiyaman University Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Umut Gulacti

Clinical Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Umut Gülaçtı

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Adiyaman University of Medical Faculty

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Adiyaman University Research Hospital

Adıyaman, Central, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Egerton-Warburton D, Meek R, Mee MJ, Braitberg G. Antiemetic use for nausea and vomiting in adult emergency department patients: randomized controlled trial comparing ondansetron, metoclopramide, and placebo. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;64(5):526-532.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24818542 (View on PubMed)

Yang B, Xu Z, Chen L, Chen X, Xie Y. The efficacy of dexketoprofen for migraine attack: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e17734. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017734.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31725614 (View on PubMed)

Yavuz E, Gulacti U, Lok U, Turgut K. Intravenous metoclopramide versus dexketoprofen trometamol versus metoclopramide+ dexketoprofen trometamol in acute migraine attack in the emergency department: A randomized double-blind controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;38(11):2254-2258. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.038. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32359776 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

66175679-514.04.01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Prochlorperazine vs Metoclopramide
NCT00364806 COMPLETED PHASE4
The Montefiore Metoclopramide Study
NCT00475306 COMPLETED PHASE4