A Retrospective Validations Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Testing v Mismatch Repair (MMR) in Gastric Adenocarcinoma

NCT ID: NCT04232020

Last Updated: 2020-10-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-07

Study Completion Date

2020-08-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the Idylla microsatellite instability test versus mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (IHC) in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gastric adenocarcinoma is a common form of cancer which is associated with a poor prognosis. Up to 22% of gastric adenocarcinomas arise via the microsatellite instability (MSI) / mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. These cases can be detected either by mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (IHC) or microsatellite instability testing. Detection of mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability is important because patients with this type of gastric adenocarcinoma are shown to benefit from a different therapeutic approach. High concordance between mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing has already been demonstrated. The implementation of either method is largely based on local availability. The Idylla MSI test presents a novel method of establishing MSI status in comparison to pre-existing MSI testing platforms. The Idylla MSI tests uses a fully automated, ultra-rapid system that can work on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue with no need for preceding DNA extraction. Implementation of the Idylla MSI test could reduce reporting turnaround times and requires less technical expertise to perform in comparison to other platforms.

The investigators department does not currently have the facilities to perform MSI testing on any platform, so the advantages of introducing the Idylla MSI test would also include the generic advantages of MSI testing. These advantages include: the ability to quickly check cases shown to have possible MMR loss on IHC (i.e. equivocal cases) with MSI testing; and providing an alternative to MMR IHC for screening of Lynch syndrome, reducing the burden on reporting pathologists and reduce the inter-observer variability associated with IHC interpretation.

The Idylla MSI test already demonstrates high concordance with other MSI testing platforms but has yet to be compared to the department's accepted standard of MMR IHC. This project aims to compare the Idylla MSI test to in-house MMR IHC to establish whether the two methods are concordant in reporting MMR / MSI status in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mismatch repair

MSI testing using Biocartis Idylla and MMR immunohistochemistry

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient consent
* Adequate tissue including adequate tumour burden
* Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in this biopsy

Exclusion Criteria

* No patient consent
* Inadequate tissue or block not present in archive
* No adenocarcinoma in biopsy
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mary Jones

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Senior Biomedical Scientist

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Cornwall Hospital

Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019.RCHT.107

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.