Improving the Approach to and Management of the Older Patient With Metastatic Gastric Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04618809
Last Updated: 2023-02-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-22
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Web-based Calculator Predicts Heterogeneous Frailty Trajectories
NCT05982899
Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Cycles on Patients With Node-negative Gastric Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
NCT06277453
Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT05140746
Transcriptomic Signatures in Gastric Adenocarcinoma
NCT05319392
Novel Combinations in Participants With Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
NCT05702229
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A significant challenge that surrounds the treatment of the older metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) patient in particular, lies in the lack of evidence based clinical data to guide the oncologist in determination of a treatment plan. This is a result of under representation of older patients in clinical trials. Due to these challenges, a thorough evaluation of the older patient is recommended prior to initiation of anti-cancer therapy.
The purpose of this research study is to enhance the care of the older mGC patient by increasing awareness among oncology providers of the unique aspects of care required for older patients. The goal of the study is to educate providers on the utility of geriatric assessment in guiding therapy of older metastatic gastric cancer patients. The investigators will also assess the feasibility and benefit of incorporating geriatric self-assessments into clinical practice. The study will include four phases:
1. Needs assessments - to understand the population of older gastric cancer patients seen in routine practice at community and academic centers, and assess their treatment approach.
2. Educational programming about management of older metastatic gastric cancer patients, and geriatric assessment of these patients.
3. Active testing of the use of geriatric assessment in clinical practice, including an exploratory analysis to evaluate the use of fitness trackers for evaluation of functional status.
4. Short-term follow-up chart reviews (2-3 months post intervention) to assess for actual implementation of recommended interventions identified by the geriatric assessment.
The ultimate goal is to expand this educational intervention to other oncology practices beyond those participating in this study, and for all older cancer patients regardless of their disease site. During this study period we will identify the specific gaps that exist in each practice for the care of older patients with mGC. This information is crucial to understand the needs of this patient population and will inform future trials with possible intervention. The second phase of our study will expose the practices to the use of a geriatric assessment through a patient's self-assessment tool and demonstrate its feasibility. Our hope is that all involved practices will find benefit from incorporating a geriatric assessment into their practice and will continue to use it in the future.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Provider Didactic Intervention
* Phase 1 - Providers complete a needs assessment questionnaire, which evaluates the approach to older mGC patients at each site.
* Phase 2 - Providers participate in an hour-long didactic session and begin enrolling eligible metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) patients. Enrolled mGC patients complete a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Providers complete the treatment plan and review of geriatric assessment questionnaires, which also includes an evaluation of their overall view of the utility of the geriatric assessment.
* Phase 3 - Follow-up chart reviews (2-3 months post intervention) are completed to assess for actual implementation of recommended interventions identified by the geriatric assessment.
Didactic Session
This session will include an overview of the approach to and management of older mGC patients patients through a case-based presentation.
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, including an exploratory analysis to evaluate the use of fitness trackers for evaluation of functional status.
* The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a composite of assessment scales evaluating physical, psychological, and social well-being, and is the recommended tool for evaluating an older cancer patient and determining appropriateness of therapy.
* The patient will receive a FitBit TM to wear for 4 days. Number of steps/day will be recorded.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Didactic Session
This session will include an overview of the approach to and management of older mGC patients patients through a case-based presentation.
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, including an exploratory analysis to evaluate the use of fitness trackers for evaluation of functional status.
* The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a composite of assessment scales evaluating physical, psychological, and social well-being, and is the recommended tool for evaluating an older cancer patient and determining appropriateness of therapy.
* The patient will receive a FitBit TM to wear for 4 days. Number of steps/day will be recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Evidence of mGC (mGE junction cancer allowed). Patients can be enrolled at any stage of their treatment or disease course.
3. Ongoing active therapy for mGC. Patients can be treated with any type of therapy including chemotherapy, immunotherapy or Her-2 targeted therapy.
4. Life expectancy ≥3 months.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Inability to read and understand English.
3. No evidence of mGC.
4. Not on active therapy.
5. Life expectancy \<3 months.
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network
NETWORK
Eli Lilly and Company
INDUSTRY
Fox Chase Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Efrat Dotan
Efrat Dotan, MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Temple University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-8006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.