Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Toxicity of Induction and Consolidation With CPX-351 for Patients Aged 60 to 75 Years With Secondary or High-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT ID: NCT04230239
Last Updated: 2022-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
59 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-26
2021-08-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Intensive Chemotherapy With CPX-351 in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML and Intermediate- or Adverse Genetics
NCT03897127
Effectiveness of Medium-Dose Cytarabine Combined With Venetoclax for Consolidation Therapy in Elderly Patients With Intermediate to High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT06990321
Comparison of Therapies Before Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Higher Risk MDS and Oligoblastic AML
NCT04061239
CPX-351+GO in Subjects 55 Years Old, or Older, With AML
NCT03878927
A Study to Compare Standard Chemotherapy to Therapy With CPX-351 and/or Gilteritinib for Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML With or Without FLT3 Mutations
NCT04293562
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be enrolled at diagnosis to follow the treatment arm. After that they will start induction chemotherapy with CPX-351 regimen (14 days maximum screening period). Once a patient has been evaluated for response and recovered from major complications (minimum 42 days and maximum 80 days after starting the first course), he/she will start second course (consolidation 1), unless the bone marrow and peripheral blood assessment is showing less than a partial response. If a CR or CRi is obtained after the second course, patients will start the third course after a rest and recovery period (minimum 42 days and maximum 80 days after starting the second course). After the third course an assessment of response will be done.
Patients aged between 60 and 65 years old are recommended to undergo an allo-SCT after first consolidation if they are considered fit for this procedure and they have a full matched related or unrelated donor. Patients with age less than 65-70 years old can be proposed for an allogeneic HSCT in CR/CRi if they have a composite HSCT co-morbidity index /age less than 4 and a suitable fully matched related donor. In patients over 70 years old, an allo-SCT in first CR should be avoided although the decision should be taken on an individual basis.
Patients with CR/CRi who are not considered for an allo-SCT, will follow 6 maintenance cycles with modified courses of CPX-351 schedule. Patients showing unacceptable toxicity along all therapeutic phases that, in consideration of the investigator, will be prematurely discontinued. All patients will be followed-up for survival. The study will be analyzed on an intention to treat basis. Bone marrow and response assessments will be done after each induction and consolidation course, and every 3 months after starting maintenance therapy. Patients will be followed-up for a minimum period of 3 years after the enrollment of the last patient in order to know OS, disease-free, and relapse free survival (RFS), as well as on the duration of remission and cumulative incidence of relapse. Patients may be admitted in hospital to receive the experimental treatment.
The clinical trial is divided into pre-treatment (screening), treatment periods (induction, consolidation and maintenance cycles) and follow-up:
Induction cycle (1 cycle):
It will consist of priming with daily administration of G-CSF on days -1, 1 and 2 (300 mcg/m2/day) subcutaneously, CPX-351 day 1, 3 and 5 (100 units/m2/day) IV in 90 minutes infusion, and subcutaneous G-CSF from day 10 to recovery (5 mg/kg/day). The chemotherapy course may be administered in hospital. If a complete response is obtained after the first cycle of treatment, the patient will receive consolidation cycle. If a partial response is obtained after the first cycle of treatment, the patient will receive induction 2. Response to treatment will be determined by the local investigator and will be the basis for treatment decisions. However, if there is any doubt, it should be discussed with the Study coordinator.
Induction 2 (1 cycle, only for patients with PR after induction 1):
It will consist of priming with daily administration of G-CSF on days -1, 1 and 2 (300 mcg/m2/day) subcutaneously, CPX-351 day 1 and 3 (100 units/m2/day) IV in 90 minutes infusion, and subcutaneous G-CSF from day 10 to recovery (5 mg/kg/day). The chemotherapy course may be administered in hospital.
Consolidation cycle (up to 2 cycles):
It will consist of priming with daily administration of G-CSF on days -1, 1 and 2 (300 mcg/m2/day) subcutaneously, CPX-351 day 1 and 3 (65 units/m2/day) IV in 90 minutes infusion, and subcutaneous G-CSF from day 10 to recovery (5 mg/kg/day). The chemotherapy course may be administered in hospital. Patients aged between 60 and 65 years old are recommended to undergo an allo-SCT after first consolidation if they are considered fit for this procedure and they have a full matched related or unrelated donor. Patients with age between 65-70 years old can be proposed for an allogeneic HSCT in CR/CRi if they have a composite HSCT co-morbidity index /age less than 4 and a suitable fully matched related donor. In patients over 70 years old, an allo-SCT in first CR should be avoided although the decision should be taken on an individual basis.
Maintenance cycle (up to 6 cycles):
For patients in CR and when an allo-SCT is not feasible or recommended, a maintenance treatment could be started for up to 6 additional cycles, on every 4 to 8 weeks courses, according to hematologic recovery.
It will consist of CPX-351 day 1 (50 units/m2/day) IV in 90 minutes infusion. Subcutaneous G-CSF may be used to recovery (5 mg/kg/day) in patients with grade 4 neutropenia and confirmed CR.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
Treatment cycles may be administered while the patient is hospitalized. Patients will receive a maximum of 4 treatment cycles (up to 2 inductions and 2 consolidations) and 6 maintenance cycles. Clinical conditions in the care of patients with acute leukemia require the need for flexibility. However, deviations from the study treatment defined in this section must be prospectively discussed with the coordinator.
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CPX-351
CPX-351
CPX-351 has IV administration Vyxeos contains 2.2 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL powder for concentrate for solution for infusion of Daunorubicin and cytarabine.
Each vial contains 44 mg of daunorubicin and 100 mg of cytarabine. After reconstitution, the solution contains 2.2 mg/mL daunorubicin and 5 mg/mL cytarabine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CPX-351
CPX-351 has IV administration Vyxeos contains 2.2 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL powder for concentrate for solution for infusion of Daunorubicin and cytarabine.
Each vial contains 44 mg of daunorubicin and 100 mg of cytarabine. After reconstitution, the solution contains 2.2 mg/mL daunorubicin and 5 mg/mL cytarabine
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 60 to 75 years at the time of diagnosis of AML.
3. Newly confirmed diagnosed of AML according to WHO 2008 criteria.
4. Secondary or high risk AML, defined as one of the following:
* t-AML: documentation of prior cytotoxic therapy or radiation therapy for an unrelated disease in a discharge summary or pharmacy records or radiation therapy records
* MDSAML: bone marrow documentation of MDS prior to diagnosis of AML (could have been treated previously with hypomethylating or standard chemotherapy)
* CMMoLAML: bone marrow documentation of CMMoL prior to diagnosis of AML (could have been treated previously with hypomethylating or standard chemotherapy)
* de novoAML with FISH or cytogenetic changes linked to MDS per WHO 2016 criteria.
5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.
6. Ability to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
7. Laboratory values fulfilling the following:
* Serum creatinine \< 2.0 mg/mL
* Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or total bilirubin \< 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN, subjects with elevated liver enzymes related to disease were instructed to contact the Sponsor) (subjects with Gilbert's Syndrome were instructed to contact the sponsor).
8. Subjects with second malignancies in remission may have been eligible if there was clinical evidence of disease stability for a period ≥ 6 months off cytotoxic chemotherapy, documented by imaging, tumor marker studies at screening. Subjects maintained on long-term nonchemotherapy treatment such as hormonal therapy were eligible.
9. Cardiac ejection fraction ≥ 50% assessed by echocardiography or MUGA.
10. Eligible to receive intensive chemotherapy.
11. Female patients of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and agree to use reliable methods of contraception for three months after their last dose of medication. Male patients must use a reliable method of contraception (if sexually active with a female of child-bearing potential).
12. Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests and other study procedures
Exclusion Criteria
2. Age \<60 years or \>75 years.
3. Blastic phase of bcr/abl chronic myeloid leukemia.
4. Patients with de novo AML without FISH or cytogenetic changes linked to MDS per WHO 2016 criteria.
5. Clinical evidence of active central nervous system (CNS) leukemia.
6. Subjects with active (uncontrolled, metastatic) second malignancies.
7. Any major surgery or radiation therapy in 4 weeks.
8. Subjects with myocardial impairment of any cause (eg, cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, significant valvular dysfunction, hypertensive heart disease, and congestive heart failure) resulting in heart failure by New York Heart Association Criteria (Class III or IV staging).
9. Uncontrolled infection; subjects with an infection receiving treatment (antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral treatment) could be entered into the study provided the subject was respiratory and hemodynamically stable for ≥ 72 hours.
10. Current evidence of invasive fungal infection (blood or tissue culture); subjects with recent fungal infection must have had subsequent negative cultures to be eligible; known HIV (new testing not required) or evidence of active hepatitis B or C infection (with rising transaminase values).
11. Hypersensitivity to cytarabine, daunorubicin or liposomal products.
12. Presence of any severe psychiatric disease or physical condition that, according to the physician´s criteria, contraindicates the inclusion of the patient into the clinical trial.
13. Serum creatinine ≥ 20 mg/dL (unless it is attributable to AML activity).
14. Bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, or SGOT \> 3 times the ULN (unless it is attributable to AML activity).
15. Subjects with prior cumulative anthracycline exposure of greater than 368 mg/m2 daunorubicin (or equivalent).
16. History of Wilson's disease or other copper-metabolism disorder.
17. Patients who have received an investigational agent (for any indication) within 5 half-lives of the agent and until toxicity from this has resolved to grade 1 or less; if the half-life of the agent is unknown, patients must wait 4 weeks prior to first dose of study treatment.
60 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
PETHEMA Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pau Montesinos Fernández, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Universitario La Fe
José Antonio Pérez Simón, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
Carmen López-Carrero García
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Fundación Pethema
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Català D'Oncologia-Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol
Badalona, , Spain
Institut Català D'Oncologia - Hospital Duran I Reynals
Bellvitge, , Spain
Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara
Cáceres, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
Córdoba, , Spain
Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín
Las Palmas, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti
Lugo, , Spain
Hospital Ramón Y Cajal
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, , Spain
Hospital General Del H.U. Virgen Del Rocío
Seville, , Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Y Politécnico La Fe
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Appelbaum FR, Gundacker H, Head DR, Slovak ML, Willman CL, Godwin JE, Anderson JE, Petersdorf SH. Age and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2006 May 1;107(9):3481-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3724. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
Juliusson G, Antunovic P, Derolf A, Lehmann S, Mollgard L, Stockelberg D, Tidefelt U, Wahlin A, Hoglund M. Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Blood. 2009 Apr 30;113(18):4179-87. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-172007. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A, Wierzbowska A, Selleslag D, Jang JH, Kumar R, Cavenagh J, Schuh AC, Candoni A, Recher C, Sandhu I, Bernal del Castillo T, Al-Ali HK, Martinelli G, Falantes J, Noppeney R, Stone RM, Minden MD, McIntyre H, Songer S, Lucy LM, Beach CL, Dohner H. International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts. Blood. 2015 Jul 16;126(3):291-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-621664. Epub 2015 May 18.
Kantarjian HM, Thomas XG, Dmoszynska A, Wierzbowska A, Mazur G, Mayer J, Gau JP, Chou WC, Buckstein R, Cermak J, Kuo CY, Oriol A, Ravandi F, Faderl S, Delaunay J, Lysak D, Minden M, Arthur C. Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2670-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.9429. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
Grimwade D, Walker H, Harrison G, Oliver F, Chatters S, Harrison CJ, Wheatley K, Burnett AK, Goldstone AH; Medical Research Council Adult Leukemia Working Party. The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial. Blood. 2001 Sep 1;98(5):1312-20. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.5.1312.
Frohling S, Schlenk RF, Kayser S, Morhardt M, Benner A, Dohner K, Dohner H; German-Austrian AML Study Group. Cytogenetics and age are major determinants of outcome in intensively treated acute myeloid leukemia patients older than 60 years: results from AMLSG trial AML HD98-B. Blood. 2006 Nov 15;108(10):3280-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-014324. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
Tardi P, Johnstone S, Harasym N, Xie S, Harasym T, Zisman N, Harvie P, Bermudes D, Mayer L. In vivo maintenance of synergistic cytarabine:daunorubicin ratios greatly enhances therapeutic efficacy. Leuk Res. 2009 Jan;33(1):129-39. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2008.06.028. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
Feldman EJ, Lancet JE, Kolitz JE, Ritchie EK, Roboz GJ, List AF, Allen SL, Asatiani E, Mayer LD, Swenson C, Louie AC. First-in-man study of CPX-351: a liposomal carrier containing cytarabine and daunorubicin in a fixed 5:1 molar ratio for the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):979-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.5961. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
Lancet JE, Cortes JE, Hogge DE, Tallman MS, Kovacsovics TJ, Damon LE, Komrokji R, Solomon SR, Kolitz JE, Cooper M, Yeager AM, Louie AC, Feldman EJ. Phase 2 trial of CPX-351, a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine/daunorubicin, vs cytarabine/daunorubicin in older adults with untreated AML. Blood. 2014 May 22;123(21):3239-46. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-12-540971. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
Lancet JE, Uy GL, Cortes JE, et al. Final results of a phase III randomized trial of CPX-351 versus 7+3 in older patients with newly diagnosed high risk (secondary) AML. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 7000).
Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, Buchner T, Willman CL, Estey EH, Schiffer CA, Doehner H, Tallman MS, Lister TA, Lo-Coco F, Willemze R, Biondi A, Hiddemann W, Larson RA, Lowenberg B, Sanz MA, Head DR, Ohno R, Bloomfield CD; International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec 15;21(24):4642-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.036.
Lee SJ, Lindquist K, Segal MR, Covinsky KE. Development and validation of a prognostic index for 4-year mortality in older adults. JAMA. 2006 Feb 15;295(7):801-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.7.801.
Dohner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Buchner T, Dombret H, Ebert BL, Fenaux P, Larson RA, Levine RL, Lo-Coco F, Naoe T, Niederwieser D, Ossenkoppele GJ, Sanz M, Sierra J, Tallman MS, Tien HF, Wei AH, Lowenberg B, Bloomfield CD. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017 Jan 26;129(4):424-447. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
Rodriguez-Arboli E, Rodriguez-Veiga R, Soria-Saldise E, Bergua JM, Caballero-Velazquez T, Arnan M, Vives S, Serrano J, Bernal T, Martinez-Sanchez P, Tormo M, Rodriguez-Medina C, Herrera-Puente P, Lavilla-Rubira E, Boluda B, Acuna-Cruz E, Cano I, Caceres S, Ballesteros J, Falantes J, Martinez-Cuadron D, Perez-Simon JA, Montesinos P; PETHEMA Group. A phase 2, multicenter, clinical trial of CPX-351 in older patients with secondary or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: PETHEMA-LAMVYX. Cancer. 2025 Jan 1;131(1):e35618. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35618. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-004353-24
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
LAMVYX
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.