Role of the Therapy Tailored to Risk Factors in Treating Adult Patients (≤60) With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT ID: NCT02072811
Last Updated: 2014-02-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-02-28
2018-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Research of PALG group in the application in the second line regimen CLAG and CLAG-M proved high effectiveness of this treatment with low toxicity. Considering experience of PALG groups, it seems that the use of the schema CLAG early as the second induction therapy is a viable treatment option.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Risk-adapted Therapy for Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT04687098
Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Patients Over the Age of 60 : DA Versus Mitoxantrone With Intermittent AraC
NCT00180167
Risk-Adapted Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia of Adults (18-60 Years) According to the Cytogenetic Result
NCT00146120
A PALG Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Two Standard Induction Therapies (DA-90 vs DAC) and Two Standard Salvage Regimens (FLAG-IDA vs CLAG-M) in AML Patients ≤ 60 Years Old
NCT03257241
Safety Study of AG-120 or AG-221 in Combination With Induction and Consolidation Therapy in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With an IDH1 and/or IDH2 Mutation
NCT02632708
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Favorable risk
t(8;21)(q22;q22); RUNX1-RUNX1T1 inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB-MYH11 Mutated NPM1 without FLT3-ITD (NK) Mutated CEBPA (NK)
Intermediate I risk
Mutated NPM1 with FLT3-ITD (NK) Wild-type NPM1 and FLT3-ITD (NK) Wild-type NPM1 without FLT3-ITD (NK)
Intermediate II risk
t(9;11)(p22;q22); MLLT3-MLL cytogenic abnormalities other than favorable or adverse
Adverse risk
Inv(3)(q21q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2); RPN-EVI1
Very adverse risk monosomal karyotype (MK): -5 or del(5q); -7; abnl(17p); complex karyotype
Goals:
* Evaluation of the impact of therapy tailored to the risk factors on outcome of AML patients aged ≤ 60.
* Evaluation of the possibility to improve the results of induction therapy through the use of early 2nd induction in patients with persistent leukemic infiltration of the bone marrow at the 14th day,
* Evaluation of the impact of the minimal residual disease (MRD) presence assessed by Immunophenotyping method, on the results of treatment of AML patients aged ≤ 60,
* Assessing the significance of monitoring the number of leukemic stem cells (LSC) in bone marrow and peripheral blood and their influence on clinical course and outcome of AML treatment,
* Assessment of the LSC determination usefulness in MRD monitoring in patients with AML,
* Evaluation of the prognostic significance of the expression of CXCR-4 on the surface of leukemic cells and their impact on the clinical course and outcome of AML - trying to select a group of patients who potentially would benefit from the use of chemosensitization with plerixafor,
* Evaluation of autologous HSCT effectiveness in consolidation therapy in AML patients from 3 following cytogenetic-molecular risk groups: Favorable, Intermediate I, Intermediate II,
* Comparison of the overall survive (OS) and leukemia-free survival after autologous and allogeneic HSCT in AML patients from Intermediate I and Intermediate II cytogenetic-molecular risk groups (biological randomization donor vs. donor).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Induction, DAC
The first stage of treatment.
First DAC induction cycle is common to all patients (regardless of risk group). After completion of induction I occurs early assessment of bone marrow on the +14 day after the start of treatment (+7 day after completion of chemotherapy).
DAC
* DNR 60 mg/m2 0,5h infusion iv on 1-3 days
* 2-CdA 5 mg/m2 2h. infusion iv on 1-5 days
* Ara-C 200 mg/m2 12h infusion iv 2h after end of infusion with 2CdA on 1-7 days
II early induction, CLAG
Patients with blasts in the bone marrow in D14\> 10% receive early second induction (CLAG) which start form +16 day.
Patients with blasts in the bone marrow in D14 ≤ 10% do not receive early second induction and are qualified to assess the response times on +28 day or after full morphology recovery (if it occurs before the +28 day
CLAG
* G-CSF 30MU sc, on 0-5 days
* Mitoxantrone 10mg/m2 30 min infusion iv, on 1-3 days
* Cladribine 5mg/m2 in 2h infusion iv, on 1-5 days
* Ara-C 2000mg/m2 4h infusion iv, infusion start after 2h of Cladribine infusion end, on 1-5 day
Consolidation, I HAM cycle
I induction cycle starts after complete remission (CR).
\- After I consolidation, patients from Intermediate I an Intermediate II group (ELN prognostic system):
If compatible donor is present - allogeneic HSCT qualification after I or II consolidation. If compatible donor for allogeneic HSCT is not present - attempt to CD34+ mobilization for autologous SCT after II consolidation
\- After I consolidation, patients from Adverse risk group (ELN prognostic system):
If compatible donor is present - immediate qualification for allogeneic HSCT.
\- Finding a donor should be initiated in all patients, at the latest after the end of I induction. In the first place, it should be checked whether the patient has a donor family, if not - searching start for an unrelated donor. For patients with no compatible donor for allogeneic HSCT - need to start searching for an alternative donor
Consolidation, I HAM cycle
* Ara-C 3g/m2; 3h infusion iv every 12h on 1,2,3 days
* Mitoxantrone 10mg/m2; 0,5h infusion iv on 3,4,5 days
II Consolidation HiDAraC
Patients from all 5 risk group receive second after first consolidation \[Ara-C\] Patient from Very adverse risk receive Ara-C + CLA (Cladribine). If it is needed - more intensive consolidation treatment with 2-Cda.
Patients form Very adverse risk receive Maintenance treatment:
Decitabine 20 mg/m2 60 min infusion iv (Intravenous injection) for 5 days every 6 weeks.
Patients from Favorable, - Intermediate I an Intermediate II risk groups: CD34+ mobilization (HSCT qualification).
II Consolidation HiDAraC
• Ara-C 3g/m2 every 12h; 3h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days (+ mobilization of CD34+)
Consolidation, III HiDAraC cycle
Patients from Favorable, Intermediate I an Intermediate II risk groups receive III consolidation or autologous HSCT (depends on results of mobilization).
Patients from Adverse risk receive III Consolidation HiDAraC + Cladribina (CLA) If no CR: CLAG-M reinduction therapy and after CR - treatment according to protocol.
Consolidation, III HiDAraC cycle
* Ara-C 3g/m2 every 12h; 3h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days
* 2-CdA 5 mg/m2 2h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days, 2h before Ara-C
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DAC
* DNR 60 mg/m2 0,5h infusion iv on 1-3 days
* 2-CdA 5 mg/m2 2h. infusion iv on 1-5 days
* Ara-C 200 mg/m2 12h infusion iv 2h after end of infusion with 2CdA on 1-7 days
CLAG
* G-CSF 30MU sc, on 0-5 days
* Mitoxantrone 10mg/m2 30 min infusion iv, on 1-3 days
* Cladribine 5mg/m2 in 2h infusion iv, on 1-5 days
* Ara-C 2000mg/m2 4h infusion iv, infusion start after 2h of Cladribine infusion end, on 1-5 day
Consolidation, I HAM cycle
* Ara-C 3g/m2; 3h infusion iv every 12h on 1,2,3 days
* Mitoxantrone 10mg/m2; 0,5h infusion iv on 3,4,5 days
II Consolidation HiDAraC
• Ara-C 3g/m2 every 12h; 3h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days (+ mobilization of CD34+)
Consolidation, III HiDAraC cycle
* Ara-C 3g/m2 every 12h; 3h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days
* 2-CdA 5 mg/m2 2h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days, 2h before Ara-C
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age: ≥18 and ≤ 60
* Clinical condition of the patient allows to carry out induction therapy: ECOG performance status: ≤ 2 and the Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-Co-morbidity Index (HCT-I): ≤3
* Informed consent to participate in the study (ICF signed)
* The second early induction start criteria is in addition to the listed above, the percentage of the blasts on the level \>10% on 7th day.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* HIV infection
* Active cancer
* Active hepatitis virus infection
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Polish Adult Leukemia Group
OTHER
Copernicus Memorial Hospital
OTHER
dr hab. n. med. Agnieszka Wierzbowska
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
dr hab. n. med. Agnieszka Wierzbowska
PhD in Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Hematology Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Copernicus Memorial Hospital
Lodz, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pluta A, Robak T, Brzozowski K, Stepka K, Wawrzyniak E, Krawczynska A, Czemerska M, Szmigielska-Kaplon A, Grzybowska-Izydorczyk O, Nowicki M, Stelmach P, Kuydowicz M, Gromek T, Hus M, Helbig G, Grosicki S, Bodzenta E, Razny M, Wojcik K, Bolkun L, Kloczko J, Knopinska-Posluszny W, Piekarska A, Hellman A, Sobas M, Wrobel T, Patkowska E, Lech-Maranda E, Warzocha K, Holowiecki J, Giebel S, Wierzbowska A. Early induction intensification with cladribine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (CLAM) in AML patients treated with the DAC induction regimen: a prospective, non-randomized, phase II study of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG). Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Mar;61(3):588-603. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1678151. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PALG-AML2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.