Role of the Therapy Tailored to Risk Factors in Treating Adult Patients (≤60) With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT02072811

Last Updated: 2014-02-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2018-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In view of the diversity of the biology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy in individual patients must be individualized. One of the tools for this is molecular-cytogenetic stratification. It divides patients into five categories (prognostic groups): Favorable, Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2, Adverse and Very adverse risk. After remission proceedings are tailored depending on prognostic determined groups.

Research of PALG group in the application in the second line regimen CLAG and CLAG-M proved high effectiveness of this treatment with low toxicity. Considering experience of PALG groups, it seems that the use of the schema CLAG early as the second induction therapy is a viable treatment option.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with AML with one of 5 prognostic categories based on modified cytogenetic-molecular stratification (European Leukemia Net Prognostic System - ENL)

Favorable risk

t(8;21)(q22;q22); RUNX1-RUNX1T1 inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB-MYH11 Mutated NPM1 without FLT3-ITD (NK) Mutated CEBPA (NK)

Intermediate I risk

Mutated NPM1 with FLT3-ITD (NK) Wild-type NPM1 and FLT3-ITD (NK) Wild-type NPM1 without FLT3-ITD (NK)

Intermediate II risk

t(9;11)(p22;q22); MLLT3-MLL cytogenic abnormalities other than favorable or adverse

Adverse risk

Inv(3)(q21q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2); RPN-EVI1

Very adverse risk monosomal karyotype (MK): -5 or del(5q); -7; abnl(17p); complex karyotype

Goals:

* Evaluation of the impact of therapy tailored to the risk factors on outcome of AML patients aged ≤ 60.
* Evaluation of the possibility to improve the results of induction therapy through the use of early 2nd induction in patients with persistent leukemic infiltration of the bone marrow at the 14th day,
* Evaluation of the impact of the minimal residual disease (MRD) presence assessed by Immunophenotyping method, on the results of treatment of AML patients aged ≤ 60,
* Assessing the significance of monitoring the number of leukemic stem cells (LSC) in bone marrow and peripheral blood and their influence on clinical course and outcome of AML treatment,
* Assessment of the LSC determination usefulness in MRD monitoring in patients with AML,
* Evaluation of the prognostic significance of the expression of CXCR-4 on the surface of leukemic cells and their impact on the clinical course and outcome of AML - trying to select a group of patients who potentially would benefit from the use of chemosensitization with plerixafor,
* Evaluation of autologous HSCT effectiveness in consolidation therapy in AML patients from 3 following cytogenetic-molecular risk groups: Favorable, Intermediate I, Intermediate II,
* Comparison of the overall survive (OS) and leukemia-free survival after autologous and allogeneic HSCT in AML patients from Intermediate I and Intermediate II cytogenetic-molecular risk groups (biological randomization donor vs. donor).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Induction, DAC

The first stage of treatment.

First DAC induction cycle is common to all patients (regardless of risk group). After completion of induction I occurs early assessment of bone marrow on the +14 day after the start of treatment (+7 day after completion of chemotherapy).

Group Type OTHER

DAC

Intervention Type DRUG

* DNR 60 mg/m2 0,5h infusion iv on 1-3 days
* 2-CdA 5 mg/m2 2h. infusion iv on 1-5 days
* Ara-C 200 mg/m2 12h infusion iv 2h after end of infusion with 2CdA on 1-7 days

II early induction, CLAG

Patients with blasts in the bone marrow in D14\> 10% receive early second induction (CLAG) which start form +16 day.

Patients with blasts in the bone marrow in D14 ≤ 10% do not receive early second induction and are qualified to assess the response times on +28 day or after full morphology recovery (if it occurs before the +28 day

Group Type OTHER

CLAG

Intervention Type DRUG

* G-CSF 30MU sc, on 0-5 days
* Mitoxantrone 10mg/m2 30 min infusion iv, on 1-3 days
* Cladribine 5mg/m2 in 2h infusion iv, on 1-5 days
* Ara-C 2000mg/m2 4h infusion iv, infusion start after 2h of Cladribine infusion end, on 1-5 day

Consolidation, I HAM cycle

I induction cycle starts after complete remission (CR).

\- After I consolidation, patients from Intermediate I an Intermediate II group (ELN prognostic system):

If compatible donor is present - allogeneic HSCT qualification after I or II consolidation. If compatible donor for allogeneic HSCT is not present - attempt to CD34+ mobilization for autologous SCT after II consolidation

\- After I consolidation, patients from Adverse risk group (ELN prognostic system):

If compatible donor is present - immediate qualification for allogeneic HSCT.

\- Finding a donor should be initiated in all patients, at the latest after the end of I induction. In the first place, it should be checked whether the patient has a donor family, if not - searching start for an unrelated donor. For patients with no compatible donor for allogeneic HSCT - need to start searching for an alternative donor

Group Type OTHER

Consolidation, I HAM cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

* Ara-C 3g/m2; 3h infusion iv every 12h on 1,2,3 days
* Mitoxantrone 10mg/m2; 0,5h infusion iv on 3,4,5 days

II Consolidation HiDAraC

Patients from all 5 risk group receive second after first consolidation \[Ara-C\] Patient from Very adverse risk receive Ara-C + CLA (Cladribine). If it is needed - more intensive consolidation treatment with 2-Cda.

Patients form Very adverse risk receive Maintenance treatment:

Decitabine 20 mg/m2 60 min infusion iv (Intravenous injection) for 5 days every 6 weeks.

Patients from Favorable, - Intermediate I an Intermediate II risk groups: CD34+ mobilization (HSCT qualification).

Group Type OTHER

II Consolidation HiDAraC

Intervention Type DRUG

• Ara-C 3g/m2 every 12h; 3h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days (+ mobilization of CD34+)

Consolidation, III HiDAraC cycle

Patients from Favorable, Intermediate I an Intermediate II risk groups receive III consolidation or autologous HSCT (depends on results of mobilization).

Patients from Adverse risk receive III Consolidation HiDAraC + Cladribina (CLA) If no CR: CLAG-M reinduction therapy and after CR - treatment according to protocol.

Group Type OTHER

Consolidation, III HiDAraC cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

* Ara-C 3g/m2 every 12h; 3h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days
* 2-CdA 5 mg/m2 2h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days, 2h before Ara-C

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DAC

* DNR 60 mg/m2 0,5h infusion iv on 1-3 days
* 2-CdA 5 mg/m2 2h. infusion iv on 1-5 days
* Ara-C 200 mg/m2 12h infusion iv 2h after end of infusion with 2CdA on 1-7 days

Intervention Type DRUG

CLAG

* G-CSF 30MU sc, on 0-5 days
* Mitoxantrone 10mg/m2 30 min infusion iv, on 1-3 days
* Cladribine 5mg/m2 in 2h infusion iv, on 1-5 days
* Ara-C 2000mg/m2 4h infusion iv, infusion start after 2h of Cladribine infusion end, on 1-5 day

Intervention Type DRUG

Consolidation, I HAM cycle

* Ara-C 3g/m2; 3h infusion iv every 12h on 1,2,3 days
* Mitoxantrone 10mg/m2; 0,5h infusion iv on 3,4,5 days

Intervention Type DRUG

II Consolidation HiDAraC

• Ara-C 3g/m2 every 12h; 3h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days (+ mobilization of CD34+)

Intervention Type DRUG

Consolidation, III HiDAraC cycle

* Ara-C 3g/m2 every 12h; 3h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days
* 2-CdA 5 mg/m2 2h infusion iv on 1,3,5 days, 2h before Ara-C

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

- Cladribine - Cytosine arabinoside [Ara-C] - Daunorubicin - Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [G-CSF] - Cladribine - Mitoxantrone - Cytosine arabinoside [Ara C] - Mitoxantrone - Cytosine arabinoside [Ara-C] - Cytosine arabinoside [Ara-C] - Cladribine - Cytosine arabinoside [Ara-C] - 2-CdA [Cladribine, 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine]

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult acute myeloid leukemia
* Age: ≥18 and ≤ 60
* Clinical condition of the patient allows to carry out induction therapy: ECOG performance status: ≤ 2 and the Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-Co-morbidity Index (HCT-I): ≤3
* Informed consent to participate in the study (ICF signed)
* The second early induction start criteria is in addition to the listed above, the percentage of the blasts on the level \>10% on 7th day.

Exclusion Criteria

* No informed consent for participation in the study, mental illness, which don't allow to obtain informed consent and conduct the treatment according to the protocol
* Pregnancy
* HIV infection
* Active cancer
* Active hepatitis virus infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Polish Adult Leukemia Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Copernicus Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

dr hab. n. med. Agnieszka Wierzbowska

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

dr hab. n. med. Agnieszka Wierzbowska

PhD in Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Hematology Department

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Copernicus Memorial Hospital

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Agnieszka Wierzbowska, dr hab.n.med.

Role: CONTACT

+48426895191

Agnieszka Pluta, dr n.med.

Role: CONTACT

+48426895191

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pluta A, Robak T, Brzozowski K, Stepka K, Wawrzyniak E, Krawczynska A, Czemerska M, Szmigielska-Kaplon A, Grzybowska-Izydorczyk O, Nowicki M, Stelmach P, Kuydowicz M, Gromek T, Hus M, Helbig G, Grosicki S, Bodzenta E, Razny M, Wojcik K, Bolkun L, Kloczko J, Knopinska-Posluszny W, Piekarska A, Hellman A, Sobas M, Wrobel T, Patkowska E, Lech-Maranda E, Warzocha K, Holowiecki J, Giebel S, Wierzbowska A. Early induction intensification with cladribine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (CLAM) in AML patients treated with the DAC induction regimen: a prospective, non-randomized, phase II study of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG). Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Mar;61(3):588-603. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1678151. Epub 2019 Oct 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31661339 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PALG-AML2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

"InDACtion" vs "3+7" Induction in AML
NCT02172872 UNKNOWN PHASE3