Comparison Between Two Rates of Activation of Miniscrew-Supported Upper Jaw Expander in Adolescents
NCT ID: NCT04225637
Last Updated: 2021-06-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-01
2021-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Facilitated by Micro-osteoperforation in Adolescent Patients With Skeletal Maxillary Constriction
NCT03772379
Immediate Skeletal and Dento-alveolar Effects of Two and Four Mini-screw Supported Hyrax for Maxillary Expansion in Non-growing Patients
NCT06851728
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforation on Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction
NCT03764189
Comparison of Two Miniscrew Anchored Maxillary Protraction Protocols
NCT03712007
Evaluation of Two Protocol of Maxillary Protraction in Class III Adolescent After Using (MSE)
NCT05489302
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The null hypothesis of the current study is that there is no difference between slow and rapid activation protocols of miniscrew-supported expander.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Slow maxillary expansion
The miniscrew-supported maxillary expander is activated by turning the expansion screw once every other day.
Miniscrew-Supported Maxillary Expander- Slow activation
A maxillary expander is supported on 4 palatal miniscrews. The appliance is activated slowly by turning the expansion screw once every other day to correct the transverse maxillary deficiency.
Rapid maxillary expansion
The miniscrew-supported maxillary expander is activated by turning the expansion screw twice daily.
Miniscrew-Supported Maxillary Expander- Rapid activation
A maxillary expander is supported on 4 palatal miniscrews. The appliance is activated rapidly by turning the expansion screw twice per day to correct the transverse maxillary deficiency.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Miniscrew-Supported Maxillary Expander- Slow activation
A maxillary expander is supported on 4 palatal miniscrews. The appliance is activated slowly by turning the expansion screw once every other day to correct the transverse maxillary deficiency.
Miniscrew-Supported Maxillary Expander- Rapid activation
A maxillary expander is supported on 4 palatal miniscrews. The appliance is activated rapidly by turning the expansion screw twice per day to correct the transverse maxillary deficiency.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants indicated for skeletal maxillary expansion due to unilateral or bilateral posterior cross bite or maxillary transverse deficiency
* Good oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria
* History of maxillary trauma
* Patients with congenital craniofacial malformations
* Patients receiving pharmacological agents or having systemic diseases that might affect the bone metabolism or the pain response
12 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alexandria University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yomna Mohamed Mohamed Yacout
Assistant lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yomna M Yacout, BDS, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Alexandria University
Nadia M El Harouni, BDS,MSc,PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Alexandria University
Essam M Abdallah, BDS,MSc,PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Alexandria University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lin L, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Moon SC, Kim SH, Nelson G. Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):253-62. doi: 10.2319/030514-156.1. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
Yilmaz A, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Erken S, Polat-Ozsoy O. Comparison of short-term effects of mini-implant-supported maxillary expansion appliance with two conventional expansion protocols. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Oct;37(5):556-64. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju094. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
Lagravere MO, Carey J, Heo G, Toogood RW, Major PW. Transverse, vertical, and anteroposterior changes from bone-anchored maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Mar;137(3):304.e1-12; discussion 304-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.09.016.
Algharbi M, Bazargani F, Dimberg L. Do different maxillary expansion appliances influence the outcomes of the treatment? Eur J Orthod. 2018 Jan 23;40(1):97-106. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx035.
Carvalho Trojan L, Andres Gonzalez-Torres L, Claudia Moreira Melo A, Barbosa de Las Casas E. Stresses and Strains Analysis Using Different Palatal Expander Appliances in Upper Jaw and Midpalatal Suture. Artif Organs. 2017 Jun;41(6):E41-E51. doi: 10.1111/aor.12817. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
ElNaghy R, Al-Qawasmi R, Hasanin M. Do patient-reported outcomes of miniscrew-supported maxillary expansion in adolescent patients differ between slow and rapid activation protocol? Evid Based Dent. 2023 Mar;24(1):28-29. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00858-8. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Institutional Review Board (IORG0008839/IRB00010556- Faculty of Dentistry - Alexandria University )
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
01012019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.