Tow Maxillary Hybrid Expanders Screw Supported Versus Lateral Angulated One; a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study
NCT ID: NCT05193513
Last Updated: 2022-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-10
2023-10-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Immediate Skeletal and Dento-alveolar Effects of Two and Four Mini-screw Supported Hyrax for Maxillary Expansion in Non-growing Patients
NCT06851728
Evaluation of the Effect of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expanders (Conventional, Hybrid and MSE)
NCT05446714
Evaluation of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Facilitated by Micro-osteoperforation in Adolescent Patients With Skeletal Maxillary Constriction
NCT03772379
Maxillary Expansion: Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander
NCT05135962
Evaluation of Modified Hyrax Versus Quad Helix in Treatment of Posterior Cross Bite
NCT06300775
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group (1)
tow perpendicular miniscrews supported hybrid expanders
hybrid expanders
tow maxillary hybrid expanders supported anteriorly with tow miniscrews
group (2)
tow angulated miniscrews supported hybrid expanders
hybrid expanders
tow maxillary hybrid expanders supported anteriorly with tow miniscrews
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
hybrid expanders
tow maxillary hybrid expanders supported anteriorly with tow miniscrews
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients that necessitated maxillary expansion due to constricted maxillary arch shown by a unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite.
3. The patient should have no missing teeth except third molars.
4. Age ranged from 12 to 18 years old.
5. The patient should have a good gingival condition.
6. The patient should have a good periodontal condition.
Exclusion Criteria
\-
12 Years
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Al-Azhar University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdallah EL sayed Mohamed Hassan
Comparison of tow maxillary hybrid expanders -perpendicular screw Supported versus lateral angulated one; a prospective randomized clinical study
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Al azhar university
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
628/3133
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.