Mandibular Vertical Height Augmentation in Segmental Defects Using Combined Vascularized and Non-Vascularized Fibula Flap

NCT ID: NCT04219683

Last Updated: 2020-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

7 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-01

Study Completion Date

2021-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Segmental mandibulectomy, often employed for resection of a tumour, and occasionally for trauma, osteoradionecrosis, or osteomyelitis, adversely affects patient's quality of life (QoL) to a varying degree. It inflicts a significant defect in the head and neck region, impacting on facial appearance, and the functions of speech, malocclusion, mastication, swallowing, and health-related QoL. Mandible resection thus creates a significant impact on a patient's life, both aesthetically as well as functionally.

Restoration of the defects following resection of any part of the mandible presents a challenging problem for reconstructive surgeons. Since the introduction of fibula free flap (FFF) by Taylor in 1975, it has become the most popular choice for mandible reconstruction. Hidalgo popularized the FFF, and reported on its versatility with satisfactory outcomes. The utility and techniques of free flap mandible reconstruction have advanced in the past 2 decades, with success rate up from 82.6% to 100%. As the longest bone segment available for reconstructive purpose, FFF is known for its wide variety of applications, following mandible resection, including angle-to-angle reconstruction.

The fibula-free flap is currently considered the most popular, 'the gold standard and the workhorse flap' for mandibular reconstruction.

However, because of the limited diameter of the fibula flap compared with the height of the mandible, vertical distance between the reconstructed segment and the occlusal plane can be substantial. This is a particular problem in the dentate mandible, especially when rehabilitation with dental implants or an implant-borne denture is contemplated. Insufficient bone height leads to overloading of osteointegrated implants and endangers the longevity of the prosthetic restoration. Insufficient bone height and poor soft tissue overlying the bone flap also create an unfavourable environment for the tissue-borne prosthesis.

Such issues are particularly acute in patients with intact alveolar bone and dentition at healthy sites. The double-barrel technique, distraction osteogenesis, non-vascularized bone grafts, and guided-bone regeneration have all been used to resolve this. The double-barrel technique is a good method, but drawbacks include excess height of the neomandible and the considerable time required to contour and adapt the upper barrel. Distraction osteogenesis is a valuable and predictable treatment option; however, its wide application is limited by complexity of the surgery and the need for additional secondary surgery.

To Overcome these challenges the investigators design a technique for mandibular reconstruction where free vascularized fibula flap is splitted and non-vascularized fibula graft is harvest from same leg and is placed between two splitted parts of free fibula flap to increase vertical height of fibula.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mandibular Reconstruction Using Free Fibula Flap

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient with resected Mandible

Patient with resected mandible who is candidate for free fibula flap

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mandibular vertical height augmentation in segmental defects using combined vascularized and non-vascularized fibula flap

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Using Free Fibula Flap for reconstruction of mandibular segemental defect

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mandibular vertical height augmentation in segmental defects using combined vascularized and non-vascularized fibula flap

Using Free Fibula Flap for reconstruction of mandibular segemental defect

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient who require mandibular resection due to tumor, trauma, osteomyelitis or osteoradionecrosis.
* Patient with Mandibular defect \>9 cm.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with systemic condition counteracting with the surgical procedure.
* Patients with conditions contraindicating fibular flap.
* Patients with extensive defects of the mandible where the length of the harvested fibula flap would not allow for simultaneous ipsilateral harvesting of a non-vascularized segment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Mohamed Magdy AbdelMoaz

Resident in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department faculty of dentistry- Cairo University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2020-01-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.