Mandibular Vertical Height Augmentation in Segmental Defects Using Combined Vascularized and Non-Vascularized Fibula Flap
NCT ID: NCT04219683
Last Updated: 2020-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
7 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-01
2021-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Restoration of the defects following resection of any part of the mandible presents a challenging problem for reconstructive surgeons. Since the introduction of fibula free flap (FFF) by Taylor in 1975, it has become the most popular choice for mandible reconstruction. Hidalgo popularized the FFF, and reported on its versatility with satisfactory outcomes. The utility and techniques of free flap mandible reconstruction have advanced in the past 2 decades, with success rate up from 82.6% to 100%. As the longest bone segment available for reconstructive purpose, FFF is known for its wide variety of applications, following mandible resection, including angle-to-angle reconstruction.
The fibula-free flap is currently considered the most popular, 'the gold standard and the workhorse flap' for mandibular reconstruction.
However, because of the limited diameter of the fibula flap compared with the height of the mandible, vertical distance between the reconstructed segment and the occlusal plane can be substantial. This is a particular problem in the dentate mandible, especially when rehabilitation with dental implants or an implant-borne denture is contemplated. Insufficient bone height leads to overloading of osteointegrated implants and endangers the longevity of the prosthetic restoration. Insufficient bone height and poor soft tissue overlying the bone flap also create an unfavourable environment for the tissue-borne prosthesis.
Such issues are particularly acute in patients with intact alveolar bone and dentition at healthy sites. The double-barrel technique, distraction osteogenesis, non-vascularized bone grafts, and guided-bone regeneration have all been used to resolve this. The double-barrel technique is a good method, but drawbacks include excess height of the neomandible and the considerable time required to contour and adapt the upper barrel. Distraction osteogenesis is a valuable and predictable treatment option; however, its wide application is limited by complexity of the surgery and the need for additional secondary surgery.
To Overcome these challenges the investigators design a technique for mandibular reconstruction where free vascularized fibula flap is splitted and non-vascularized fibula graft is harvest from same leg and is placed between two splitted parts of free fibula flap to increase vertical height of fibula.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient Specific PEEK Implants for Immediate Restoration of Temporal Fossa After Maxillary Reconstruction With Temporalis Muscle Flap
NCT05240963
Effect of Using Two Different Construction Techniques of Nasoalveolar Molding Devices in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
NCT05837780
Effect of Cleft Palate Repair Using Alveolar Extension Technique on Eruption and Growth
NCT05286398
Patient Outcomes of Staged Ridge-splitting Using Piezo-electric Surgery in Atrophic Posterior Mandible
NCT06200077
Clinical and Radiographic Success Following Regenerative Pulpotomy Using Chitosan Hydrogel Versus Platelet Rich Fibrin in Mature Mandibular Molars
NCT06828978
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patient with resected Mandible
Patient with resected mandible who is candidate for free fibula flap
Mandibular vertical height augmentation in segmental defects using combined vascularized and non-vascularized fibula flap
Using Free Fibula Flap for reconstruction of mandibular segemental defect
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mandibular vertical height augmentation in segmental defects using combined vascularized and non-vascularized fibula flap
Using Free Fibula Flap for reconstruction of mandibular segemental defect
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with Mandibular defect \>9 cm.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with conditions contraindicating fibular flap.
* Patients with extensive defects of the mandible where the length of the harvested fibula flap would not allow for simultaneous ipsilateral harvesting of a non-vascularized segment.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Mohamed Magdy AbdelMoaz
Resident in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department faculty of dentistry- Cairo University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEBD-CU-2020-01-03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.