A Neuroimaging Study of Open-label Placebo in Depressed Adolescents

NCT ID: NCT04201106

Last Updated: 2025-04-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-14

Study Completion Date

2032-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the current leading cause of disability worldwide and adolescence is an especially vulnerable period for the onset of depression. Non-pharmacologic approaches are particularly attractive as treatment of adolescent depression due to the elevated risks of side effects related to the use of psychotropic drugs during development. A recent meta-analysis detected a positive and significant effect of non-deceptive placebos (open-label placebo, OLP) for a series of clinical conditions, including adult depression. To the investigators' knowledge, no studies of OLP have been conducted in depressed adolescents to date, although placebo response rates in adolescent depression are especially high, accounting for over 80% of the actual response to antidepressant treatment. The study's main objective is to estimate the effectiveness and understand the mechanism of OLP in depressed adolescents. The central hypothesis is that the mechanism by which OLP exerts its action in adolescent depression is by forming a positive expectation, which activates endogenous mu-opioid receptor (MOR)-mediated neurotransmission in a network of regions implicated in emotion, stress regulation, and the pathophysiology of MDD, namely, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) - striato - amygdalo - thalamic network. The hypothesis has been formulated on the basis of published research and preliminary data. The investigators will test the hypothesis by performing structural and functional neuroimaging in 60 untreated 13-18 year-old adolescents with mild to moderate depression. The proposed research is significant, because it is expected to elucidate the mechanism of action of OLP and advance the understanding of the neural underpinnings of positive expectations in adolescent depression.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized controlled study to investigate non-deceptive placebos (open-label placebo, OLP) in depressed adolescents. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: OLP with the 4-point rationale group (n=20), OLP without rationale group (n=20), and controls (n=20) who will receive the same level of supportive attention from the study clinician. MRI scanning and clinical assessments will be performed at the baseline and after the 2-week treatment or waiting period. The main objective here is to estimate the effectiveness and understand the mechanism of OLP in depressed adolescents. The central hypothesis is that the mechanism by which OLP exerts its action in adolescent depression is by forming a positive expectation, which activates endogenous mu-opioid receptor (MOR)-mediated neurotransmission in a network of regions implicated in emotion, stress regulation, and the pathophysiology of depression, namely, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) - striato - amygdalo - thalamic network. The investigators plan to test the central hypothesis in 60 13-18 year-old adolescents with mild to moderate depression by pursuing the following Aims:

AIM 1: To test the effectiveness of OLP in depressed adolescents. Depressed adolescents will be randomly assigned for two weeks to an OLP with the 4-point rationale group (n=20), OLP without rationale group (n=20), and controls (n=20) who will receive the same level of supportive attention from the study clinician. Hypothesis 1: The improvement in depression symptoms measured by the self-report Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2) in the OLP + rationale group (that combines conscious positive expectation with conditioned response to the ingestion of medication) will be higher than in the OLP without rationale group (conditioned response only) and controls. Positive expectation of recovery will be assessed before and after group assignment and accounted for in the analyses.

AIM 2: To measure neural response to OLP. The OLP groups will receive the first dose of the OLP in the MRI scanner and changes in the cerebral blood perfusion (CBP) will be measured using arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI. Mechanistically, the investigators expect that the MOR-mediated neurotransmission activated by placebo will be associated with a CBP increase, specifically: Hypothesis 2a: The CBP increase in the ACC - striato - amygdalo - thalamic network after the administration of the OLP + rationale to be higher than in the OLP group and controls. Hypothesis 2b: This CBP increase will correlate with the improvement in RADS-2 scores after two weeks.

AIM 3: To test neural network normalization in depressed adolescents (by comparing to the existing database of MRI scans of healthy teens). The second MRI will be performed after the two weeks. Mechanistically, the investigators expect that through the regular activation by OLP, myelination of the ACC - striato - amygdalo - thalamic network will increase, leading to a normalization of the previously demonstrated hypoconnectivity. Hypothesis 3: The increases in structural and functional connectivity of the ACC - striato - amygdalo - thalamic network after two weeks will correlate with decreases in RADS-2 depression total scores.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

In the control group, the participants will not be taking any placebos or undergoing any other study-related treatments.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Open Label Placebo Group with Rationale

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Open Label Placebo with Rationale

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In the OLP + rationale group, the participants will be prescribed to take placebos for 2 weeks with the standard 4-point accompanying rationale: (1) the placebo effect is powerful, e.g. in clinical trials placebos are roughly 80% as effective as antidepressants; (2) classical conditioning is a possible mechanism for automatic self-healing - meaning that the body can automatically respond to taking placebo pills like Pavlov's dogs who salivated when they heard a bell; (3) placebo-treated patients who are more compliant have better outcomes, therefore the placebos should be taken faithfully; and (4) positive expectations increase placebo effects, but it is OK to have doubts.

Open Label Placebo Group without Rationale

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Open Label Placebo without Rationale

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In the OLP without rationale group, the adolescents will be asked to take placebos for 2 weeks but they will be told that the pills contain inert substance and do not have any pharmacological effect.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Open Label Placebo with Rationale

In the OLP + rationale group, the participants will be prescribed to take placebos for 2 weeks with the standard 4-point accompanying rationale: (1) the placebo effect is powerful, e.g. in clinical trials placebos are roughly 80% as effective as antidepressants; (2) classical conditioning is a possible mechanism for automatic self-healing - meaning that the body can automatically respond to taking placebo pills like Pavlov's dogs who salivated when they heard a bell; (3) placebo-treated patients who are more compliant have better outcomes, therefore the placebos should be taken faithfully; and (4) positive expectations increase placebo effects, but it is OK to have doubts.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Open Label Placebo without Rationale

In the OLP without rationale group, the adolescents will be asked to take placebos for 2 weeks but they will be told that the pills contain inert substance and do not have any pharmacological effect.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

The investigators will include adolescents with mild to moderate depression who meet the following criteria.

* Unmedicated 13-18 year-old adolescents of both sexes with mild to moderate depression, i.e. depressive symptoms corresponding to RADS-2 t-scores of 61-69, under the care of a mental health professional or a primary care doctor.
* Fluency in English

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects younger or older than 13-18 years old.
* Psychiatric comorbidities other than anxiety disorder, severe suicidal ideation
* MRI contraindications (ferromagnetic objects on or inside the body, e.g. braces) and pregnancy.
* Potential subjects with an inability or unwillingness to give written informed assent whose legal guardian/representative are unable or unwilling to give written informed consent will be excluded and not allowed to enroll in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tony T Yang, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCSF

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R61AT012028

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

19-29443

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Imaging Dopamine Release in Depression
NCT02033369 COMPLETED PHASE4
The Effect of Celecoxib on Neuroinflammation in MDD
NCT04814355 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4
Quetiapine in Melancholic Depression
NCT01200901 COMPLETED PHASE4
Meditation for Depression
NCT01671436 COMPLETED NA