Machine Learning in Quantitative Stress Echocardiography
NCT ID: NCT04193475
Last Updated: 2025-05-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
1250 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-11-22
2025-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will focus on developing more accurate analysis tools to interpret the results of these stress echocardiographic scans. New methods will be tested to measure the function of each part of the heart muscle, using advanced analysis of the information obtained when high-frequency sound waves are bounced off the heart inside the chest. The researchers will measure and report exact heart function during stress, so that they will be able to recognise normal hearts and those with any disease. New computer methods will be developed to display any abnormality, which will make it easier for doctors to choose the best treatment for patients who are at risk.
The goals and potential benefits of this research proposal are to update the interpretation of a routinely used clinical test (stress echocardiography) to produce a reliable new method for diagnosing the precise effects of diseased arteries on the function of the heart muscle; to develop new computer graphics that adapt to show individual risks for each patient; and to implement new computer models that can be constantly updated
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimising a Digital Diagnostic Pathway for Heart Failure in the Community
NCT04724200
Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Identifying Echocardiographic Reference Views. Ultrasound - Cardiac Acquisition Guide
NCT05265585
Deep Learning Enhanced Detection of Aortic Stenosis - The DETECT-AS-Diagnostic Study
NCT06749145
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Analysis of Synchronized Phonocardiography (PCG) and Electrocardiogram(ECG)
NCT06009718
Magnetocardiography (MCG) Parameters in the Prediction of Future ICD Therapy
NCT04352816
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Historically electrocardiographic stress testing during exercise has been used to detect inducible myocardial ischaemia but its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity are low (about 65%). Diagnostic accuracy can be improved by by incorporating echocardiography or single photon emission computed tomography. Current NICE guidelines recommend that patients with chest pain of recent onset should be investigated with CT coronary angiography as a first line, and if this reveals a significant stenosis then a functional imaging test should be performed.
The Myocardial Doppler in Stress Echocardiography (MYDISE) study assessed the diagnostic value of quantitative stress echocardiography during the infusion of dobutamine, a short-acting synthetic catecholamine that acts on β-1 adrenergic receptors to increase heart rate and myocardial contractility. Measuring the systolic velocities of LV long-axis function at peak stress had good reproducibility (coefficients of variation in basal segments 9-14% at rest and 11-18% at peak stress) and similar sensitivities and specificities (about 70%) to published studies in which expert observers reported wall motion scores. When adjusted for the independent effects of age, gender and heart rate, however, diagnostic accuracy increased significantly with C statistics (area under receiver-operator curves) up to 90%.
Visual analysis of stress echocardiography to detect myocardial ischaemia depends on qualitative assessment of multiple parameters. Major studies of quantitative stress echocardiography have been limited to identifying the single best echocardiographic variable, and they have used diameter stenosis as the reference criterion. Progressive subclinical reductions of regional (long-axis) myocardial function have been demonstrated in subjects with cardiovascular risk factors, affecting myocardial deformation (strain and strain rate) as well as velocities. Ischaemia changes the timing of events during the cardiac cycle - for example prolonging pre-ejection and post-ejection phases. These factors confirm the clinical need for objective measurement of regional myocardial function throughout the cardiac cycle.
It is now possible to create algorithms that are based not just on a single time point (e.g., peak velocity) but instead rely on analysis of the whole of the velocity trace. This concept can also be extended to include strain and strain rate curves. Investigators at Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, have developed this approach to create a statistical atlas of the heart to detect dyssynchrony. A similar concept has been applied using multiple kernel learning to patients with dyspnoea who have undergone exercise stress testing to identify those with evidence of diastolic heart failure.This has enabled velocity traces taken from the whole of the cardiac cycle to be compared and discriminated between control subjects (with and without dyspnoea) and those diagnosed with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); the major differences observed are in early diastolic function. This application has not previously been used to explore inducible myocardial ischaemia in stress echocardiography, but similar findings might be expected, as changes during diastole are amongst the earliest and most sensitive indicators of myocardial ischaemia. Individuals at the University of Leuven (Prof Jan D'hooge) have recently developed supervised machine-learning methods that allow for automatic classification of myocardial segments based on their local mechanical behaviour (i.e. velocity/strain/strain rate) after going through a training phase; the proposed machine-learning approach outperforms expert wall motion readings as well as expert interpretation of segmental strain (rate) traces in classifying ischemic segments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Chest pain
Individuals presenting with chest pain requiring a stress echocardiogram.
Analysis
No intervention planned. Novel analysis of echocardiographic data.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Analysis
No intervention planned. Novel analysis of echocardiographic data.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
89 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Barts & The London NHS Trust
OTHER
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
OTHER_GOV
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Castle Hill Hospital
Cottingham, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R2458
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.