Genetic Testing to Understand and Address Renal Disease Disparities Across the United States

NCT ID: NCT04191824

Last Updated: 2025-04-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6789 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-10

Study Completion Date

2024-05-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

GUARDD-US is a prospective, multicenter, unblinded, two arm randomized pragmatic clinical trial. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to immediate APOL1 gene testing and return of results (ROR) to participant and provider (Intervention arm) versus delayed APOL1 gene testing and ROR to participant and provider (Control arm). The main study will compare outcomes between APOL1 positive participants in the Intervention arm (i.e., early knowledge of APOL1 status) to APOL1 positive participants in the Control arm (i.e., delayed knowledge of APOL1 status). Participants that are APOL1 negative in the Intervention and Control groups will not be included in the main study analyses.

GUARDD-US also includes a substudy to determine the effect of knowledge of genetic test results that predict efficacy of various antihypertensive medications on change in SBP from baseline to 3 months in APOL1 negative individuals at participating sites.

This substudy is listed separately on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT06748040 and Unique Protocol ID - PRO00102997\_A

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High-risk variants in the APOL1 gene explain approximately 70% of the excess prevalence of CKD in African Americans (AAs), conferring a 5 times higher risk for hypertensive CKD and a 10 times higher risk for ESRD. A pilot study (GUARDD), showed that returning APOL1 gene test results had a statistically significant improvement in SBP at 3 months when comparing APOL1 positives to APOL1 negatives who received their genetic testing results and when comparing APOL1 positives that received their results early to overall controls who did not receive their results until after the 3 month visit. GUARDD was not however powered to evaluate the effects of having and knowing a positive APOL1 status on outcomes for those with high risk of developing CKD (i.e., comparing outcomes for APOL1 positive patients who know their genetic risk to APOL1 positive patients who do not know their genetic risk). A broader trial is needed to better determine the importance of APOL1 gene testing for improving the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of individuals at risk of CKD.

The primary aim is to determine the effect of participant and provider knowledge of a positive APOL1 status and accompanying guideline based clinical decision support (CDS) on blood pressure management on change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 3 months after randomization among the APOL1 positive participants. Secondary aims are to:

1. Determine the effect of participant and provider knowledge of a positive APOL1 status on the probability of documented CKD diagnosis.
2. Determine the effect of participant and provider knowledge of a positive APOL1 status on the probability of receiving a urine microalbumin/creatinine testing and ACE-I/ARB prescription based on results of the urine microalbumin level.
3. Explore cost effectiveness, mediators, moderators, psychobehavioral impact of results disclosure on participants, and effects of participant and provider knowledge of APOL1 status on provider treatment recommendations.

Approximately 6,750 participants of African ancestry age 18-70 with hypertension that either: 1) do not have diabetes and do not have CKD, or 2) have CKD. Participants with diabetes may be included as long as they also have CKD.

Population for Main Study:

Participants from Randomized Population (above) who test positive for APOL1

Main Study Analyses:

* To determine the effect of participant and provider knowledge of a positive APOL1 status on SBP, we will compare the change in SBP from baseline to 3 months of the Intervention - APOL1 positive group to the change in SBP from baseline to 3 months of the Control - APOL1 positive group using a two sided t-test, as appropriate, with an overall two-sided type I error of 0.05.
* The effect of knowledge of a positive APOL1 status on all secondary endpoints will be compared between Intervention - APOL1 positives to Control - APOL1 positives with the proportion difference test.
* Additional analyses will include analysis of time trends in SBP, subset analyses, and exploratory analyses of cost effectiveness, mediators, moderators, psychobehavioral impact of results disclosure on participants, and effects of knowledge of APOL1 status on provider treatment recommendations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Kidney Disease Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Immediate versus delayed return of Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) genetic testing results to provider and participant.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immediate Return of Results

Immediate return of results to inform participant of APOL1 status (either positive or negative).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Timing of return of results

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be randomized to immediate versus delayed APOL1 return of results

Delayed Return of Results

Delayed return of results of APOL1 status (either positive or negative) after the completion of the 6 month final study visit.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Timing of return of results

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will be randomized to immediate versus delayed APOL1 return of results

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Timing of return of results

Participants will be randomized to immediate versus delayed APOL1 return of results

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Self reported African ancestry
* English Speaking
* Age 18-70 years
* Have diagnosis of hypertension: Diagnosis of hypertension is defined by either:

* ICD10 diagnosis codes (i.e., I10; I11.x; I12.x; I13.x; I16.x) OR
* On active antihypertensive therapy for indication of hypertension OR
* Having systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or greater in at least 2 of the last 3 consecutive recorded values in the EHR OR
* Having hypertension in the patient's medical record problem list
* Have been seen at ≥1 time in past year at a participating primary care site
* Either: 1) do not have diabetes and do not have CKD, or 2) have CKD; Participants with diabetes may be included as long as they also have CKD.

CKD is defined by either: A) ICD10 codes (i.e., N18.x; E08.22; E09.22; E10.22; E11.22;E13.22 (exclude Z94.0; N18.6; Z99.2)) OR B) Microalbumin/proteinuria level \>30 mg/g for 2 time periods ≥ 3 months. Values taken within 12 months of enrollment, unless 2 values are unavailable, then review within 24 months of enrollment. OR C) 15 ≤ eGFR ≤ 60 ml/min for 2 time periods ≥ 3 months. GFRs are taken within 12 months of enrollment, unless 2 values are unavailable, then review within 24 months.

Diabetes is defined by: HbA1c ≥ 6.5 at least one time in the last year OR ICD10 diagnosis codes OR Having diabetes in the patient's medical record problem list.

Exclusion Criteria

* Have diabetes, but no CKD.
* Are currently on dialysis (ICD 10 codes N18.6, Z99.2 and Z94.0)
* Have ESRD (eGFR\<15 ml/min)
* Have a left ventricular assist device (LVAD)
* Have a terminal illness
* Have patient-reported known pregnancy at time of enrollment
* Have had a liver, kidney, or allogeneic bone marrow transplant
* Too cognitively impaired to provide informed consent and/or complete the study protocol
* Institutionalized or too ill to participate (i.e. incarcerated, psychiatric or nursing home facility)
* Plan to move out of the area within 6 months of enrollment
* Not a current patient seeing a provider who cares for their hypertension (i.e., family medicine, internal medicine, nephrology, HIV provider, cardiology, hypertension specialists) at a participating site
* Previously participated in the GUARDD pilot study OR have previously undergone APOL1 testing
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Indiana University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hrishikesh Chakraborty, DrPH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Duke University

Carol Horowitz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of Florida - Gainesville

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Florida - Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Eskenazi Health

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University Medical Center New Orleans

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

The Institute for Family Health

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Healthcare

Lumberton, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Meharry Medical College

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville General Hospital

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Baylor Research Institute

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eadon MT, Cavanaugh KL, Orlando LA, Christian D, Chakraborty H, Steen-Burrell KA, Merrill P, Seo J, Hauser D, Singh R, Beasley CM, Fuloria J, Kitzman H, Parker AS, Ramos M, Ong HH, Elwood EN, Lynch SE, Clermont S, Cicali EJ, Starostik P, Pratt VM, Nguyen KA, Rosenman MB, Calman NS, Robinson M, Nadkarni GN, Madden EB, Kucher N, Volpi S, Dexter PR, Skaar TC, Johnson JA, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Horowitz CR; GUARDD-US Investigators. Design and rationale of GUARDD-US: A pragmatic, randomized trial of genetic testing for APOL1 and pharmacogenomic predictors of antihypertensive efficacy in patients with hypertension. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106813. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106813. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35660539 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U01HG010225

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HG007269

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HG010232

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HG010248

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HG010231

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

U01HG010245

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

PRO00102997

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Renal Impairment Study of PF-06700841
NCT04260464 COMPLETED PHASE1
Exercise Intolerance in Renal Failure
NCT01356966 COMPLETED PHASE2
A Renal Impairment Study for PF-04965842
NCT03660241 COMPLETED PHASE1