Feasibility of Ultrasound-based Navigation for Non-anatomical Liver Resections

NCT ID: NCT04187937

Last Updated: 2022-06-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-17

Study Completion Date

2022-02-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In a non-anatomical resection of a liver tumor, only the part of the liver with the tumor and a safety margin of 5 - 10 mm are resected. This is done to ensure a negative resection margin, which means that no tumor cells are at the boundary of the resection. These non-anatomical resections can be performed repeatedly in case of recurrence. However, compared to anatomical resections, it is more challenging to keep a negative resection margin as anatomical landmarks cannot be used for intra-operative guidance.

In this study, the investigators aim to clinically evaluate a 3d navigation system, where navigated intra-operative ultrasound data is used to create a virtual model and a surgical plan.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Surgical resection is the current gold standard for curative care of primary and metastatic hepatic tumors. This procedure involves the removal of the part of the liver where the tumor is located. This is typically achieved by removing the segments containing the tumor, so called anatomical resections. The downside of this technique is that it also removes a large part of healthy liver tissue. Recently, non-anatomical resections are becoming more popular, as they spare more healthy liver tissue than anatomical resections with similar oncological outcomes. In a non-anatomical resection, only the part of the liver with the tumor and a safety margin of 5 - 10 mm are resected. This is done to ensure a negative resection margin, which means that no tumor cells are at the boundary of the resection. These non-anatomical resections can be performed repeatedly in case of recurrence. However, compared to anatomical resections, it is more challenging to keep a negative resection margin as anatomical landmarks cannot be used for intra-operative guidance.

In the beginning of a non-anatomical resection, a resection line is drawn onto the liver surface to visualize where the resection shall be started. During the resection process, intra-operative ultrasound is used to confirm a safe distance to the tumor. Finally, once the depth is reached, the distance to the tumor is again confirmed on ultrasound and the tumor is removed. This is a challenging process which depends on the operator's ability and experience with mentally reconstructing the spatial relationships of the ultrasound image and the intra-operative scene. Additionally, the resection margin introduces artifacts and makes it harder to visualize the safety distance to the tumor on ultrasound.

To overcome these challenges, image-guidance systems have been introduced into the surgical workflow. These systems measure the pose of the surgical instruments and display their position on a virtual model of the anatomy. They mainly rely on a registration process to align a preoperative model with the patient's anatomy intraoperatively. This process is time-consuming, complex and error prone which is the main reason why such systems are rarely used.

In this study, the investigators aim to clinically evaluate a different approach, where navigated intra-operative ultrasound data is used to create a virtual model and a surgical plan on the spot. This does not require a separate registration process. With this approach a virtual draft of the surgical plan is created, which serves as a rough guidance map through the procedure. The investigators hypothesize that using such an intra-operative surgical draft allows the surgeon to acquire a negative resection margin.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Non-randomized, non-controlled, single-arm feasibility study of intraoperative ultrasound-based navigation for non-anatomical liver resections
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Stereotactic image-guided non-anatomical resection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stereotactic image-guided resection

Intervention Type DEVICE

Stereotactic image-guided resection with an ultrasound-based image-guidance system.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stereotactic image-guided resection

Stereotactic image-guided resection with an ultrasound-based image-guidance system.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients which are regularly scheduled for an open surgical liver resection
* At least one tumor considered for non-anatomical resection
* Lesion is visible on ultrasound imaging
* Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
* Age \>= 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Other clinically condition or disease that would (as deemed by the operating surgeon) significantly increase the risk of surgery
* Lesion is close to major vessel (\< 10 mm)
* Lesion is too large to be visualized on ultrasound imaging
* Emergency
* Subjects not able to give informed consent (dementia)
* Women of childbearing potential (less than 1 year post-menopausal)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anja Lachenmayer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Moris D, Tsilimigras DI, Kostakis ID, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Shah KN, Felekouras E, Pawlik TM. Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):927-938. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29751946 (View on PubMed)

Banz VM, Muller PC, Tinguely P, Inderbitzin D, Ribes D, Peterhans M, Candinas D, Weber S. Intraoperative image-guided navigation system: development and applicability in 65 patients undergoing liver surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Jun;401(4):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1417-0. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27122364 (View on PubMed)

Lango T, Vijayan S, Rethy A, Vapenstad C, Solberg OV, Marvik R, Johnsen G, Hernes TN. Navigated laparoscopic ultrasound in abdominal soft tissue surgery: technological overview and perspectives. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Jul;7(4):585-99. doi: 10.1007/s11548-011-0656-3. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21892604 (View on PubMed)

Kingham TP, Jayaraman S, Clements LW, Scherer MA, Stefansic JD, Jarnagin WR. Evolution of image-guided liver surgery: transition from open to laparoscopic procedures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jul;17(7):1274-82. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2214-5. Epub 2013 May 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23645420 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

USGR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Buccal Cancer Resection Ultrasound Guided
NCT05852665 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA