Feasibility of Ultrasound-based Navigation for Non-anatomical Liver Resections
NCT ID: NCT04187937
Last Updated: 2022-06-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-17
2022-02-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study, the investigators aim to clinically evaluate a 3d navigation system, where navigated intra-operative ultrasound data is used to create a virtual model and a surgical plan.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Navigated Laparoscopic Microwave Ablation of Tumor Mimics in Pig Liver - an Ex-vivo Trial
NCT04106453
Ablation vs Resection of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
NCT05129787
Irreversible Electroporation for Inoperable Hepatic and Pancreatic Malignancy
NCT02822716
Endobiliary Percutaneous Cryobiopsy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT06047990
Alternative Surgical Policy for Central Liver Tumors
NCT00600522
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the beginning of a non-anatomical resection, a resection line is drawn onto the liver surface to visualize where the resection shall be started. During the resection process, intra-operative ultrasound is used to confirm a safe distance to the tumor. Finally, once the depth is reached, the distance to the tumor is again confirmed on ultrasound and the tumor is removed. This is a challenging process which depends on the operator's ability and experience with mentally reconstructing the spatial relationships of the ultrasound image and the intra-operative scene. Additionally, the resection margin introduces artifacts and makes it harder to visualize the safety distance to the tumor on ultrasound.
To overcome these challenges, image-guidance systems have been introduced into the surgical workflow. These systems measure the pose of the surgical instruments and display their position on a virtual model of the anatomy. They mainly rely on a registration process to align a preoperative model with the patient's anatomy intraoperatively. This process is time-consuming, complex and error prone which is the main reason why such systems are rarely used.
In this study, the investigators aim to clinically evaluate a different approach, where navigated intra-operative ultrasound data is used to create a virtual model and a surgical plan on the spot. This does not require a separate registration process. With this approach a virtual draft of the surgical plan is created, which serves as a rough guidance map through the procedure. The investigators hypothesize that using such an intra-operative surgical draft allows the surgeon to acquire a negative resection margin.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental
Stereotactic image-guided non-anatomical resection
Stereotactic image-guided resection
Stereotactic image-guided resection with an ultrasound-based image-guidance system.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stereotactic image-guided resection
Stereotactic image-guided resection with an ultrasound-based image-guidance system.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least one tumor considered for non-anatomical resection
* Lesion is visible on ultrasound imaging
* Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
* Age \>= 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Lesion is close to major vessel (\< 10 mm)
* Lesion is too large to be visualized on ultrasound imaging
* Emergency
* Subjects not able to give informed consent (dementia)
* Women of childbearing potential (less than 1 year post-menopausal)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bern
OTHER
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anja Lachenmayer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern
Bern, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moris D, Tsilimigras DI, Kostakis ID, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Shah KN, Felekouras E, Pawlik TM. Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):927-938. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
Banz VM, Muller PC, Tinguely P, Inderbitzin D, Ribes D, Peterhans M, Candinas D, Weber S. Intraoperative image-guided navigation system: development and applicability in 65 patients undergoing liver surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Jun;401(4):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1417-0. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
Lango T, Vijayan S, Rethy A, Vapenstad C, Solberg OV, Marvik R, Johnsen G, Hernes TN. Navigated laparoscopic ultrasound in abdominal soft tissue surgery: technological overview and perspectives. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Jul;7(4):585-99. doi: 10.1007/s11548-011-0656-3. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
Kingham TP, Jayaraman S, Clements LW, Scherer MA, Stefansic JD, Jarnagin WR. Evolution of image-guided liver surgery: transition from open to laparoscopic procedures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jul;17(7):1274-82. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2214-5. Epub 2013 May 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
USGR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.