Intraoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04899739
Last Updated: 2025-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-05
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Echo-endoscopy Biopsy Impact on the Circulating Tumor Cell Level
NCT04677244
The Role of Intraoperative Hepatic Ultrasonography in Gastrointestinal or Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
NCT06779708
CE-IOUS for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Surgery: A Prospective, Proof-of-concept Trial
NCT04683497
Diagnostic Laparoscopy in the Preoperative Staging of Pancreatobiliary Cancer
NCT02479984
Study of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Carcinomas in Alsace Region
NCT04134832
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At the same time, the video data obtained will be collected in a computer database in order to create an artificial intelligence lesion detection and qualification tool.
This study plans to recruit 45 adult patients, male or female, with a solid or cystic pancreatic tumor and for whom a surgical resection (first line and after neoadjuvant treatment) is planned. The main objective is to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of a simple classification "benign / malignant" of the nodes, established by the endoscopist using endoscopic ultrasound criteria's, compared to the gold standard (anatomopathology).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Peripancreatic and distant lymph node assessment
All patients programmed for an endoscopic ultrasound in the context of a pancreatic cancer
Echoendoscopy
Peripancreatic lymph nodes and at a distance from the pancreas assessment by endoscopic ultrasound, elastography an doppler to record their anatomical location and characteristics. All lymph nodes suspected of metastatic disease will be marked with sterile black ink.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Echoendoscopy
Peripancreatic lymph nodes and at a distance from the pancreas assessment by endoscopic ultrasound, elastography an doppler to record their anatomical location and characteristics. All lymph nodes suspected of metastatic disease will be marked with sterile black ink.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient with a solid or degenerated cystic tumor of the pancreas requiring curative surgery
3. Patient with a complete clinical examination performed
4. Patient with no contraindication to anesthesia, upper digestive endoscopy and pancreatic surgery
5. Patient able to receive and understand information relating to the study and give informed written consent
6. Patient affiliated to the French social security system
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient on anticoagulant or antiaggregant treatment that cannot be temporarily interrupted
3. Patient carrying a right-left shunt, a severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (high blood pressure pulmonary\> 90 mm Hg), uncontrolled systemic hypertension or suffering from respiratory distress syndrome.
4. Pregnant or breastfeeding patient
5. Patient in exclusion period (determined by a previous study or in progress)
6. Patient under legal protection
7. Patient under guardianship or trusteeship
18 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IHU Strasbourg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Patrick Pessaux, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Unité de Chirurgie Hépato-biliaire et Pancréatique, NHC Strasbourg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne
Strasbourg, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
Kleeff J, Reiser C, Hinz U, Bachmann J, Debus J, Jaeger D, Friess H, Buchler MW. Surgery for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007 Apr;245(4):566-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245845.06772.7d.
Poruk KE, Firpo MA, Adler DG, Mulvihill SJ. Screening for pancreatic cancer: why, how, and who? Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):17-26. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825ffbfb.
Butturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN, Jeekel H, Klinkenbijl JH, Bakkevold KE, Takada T, Amano H, Dervenis C, Bassi C, Buchler MW, Neoptolemos JP; Pancreatic Cancer Meta-Analysis Group. Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):75-83; discussion 83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.17.
Galasso D, Carnuccio A, Larghi A. Pancreatic cancer: diagnosis and endoscopic staging. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):375-85.
Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, Gross SA, Hodgens CM, Toton RD, Raimondo M. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):204-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995336. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ. A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Jun;45(6):474-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70176-7.
Kanamori A, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Hashimoto S, Kawashima H, Hara K, Uchida H, Goto J, Ohmiya N, Niwa Y, Goto H. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the differentiation between malignant and benign lymphadenopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;101(1):45-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00394.x.
Giovannini M, Thomas B, Erwan B, Christian P, Fabrice C, Benjamin E, Genevieve M, Paolo A, Pierre D, Robert Y, Walter S, Hanz S, Carl S, Christoph D, Pierre E, Jean-Luc VL, Jacques D, Peter V, Andrian S. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr 7;15(13):1587-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1587.
Nawaz H, Fan CY, Kloke J, Khalid A, McGrath K, Landsittel D, Papachristou GI. Performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. JOP. 2013 Sep 10;14(5):484-97. doi: 10.6092/1590-8577/1512.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18-007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.