Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
45 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-07-31
2018-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The present study is designed to better define the role of EUS in predicting resectability, as compared to high resolution cross-sectional imaging.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contrast-enhanced vs. B-mode Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Retroperitoneal Tumors
NCT05659433
CE-IOUS for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Surgery: A Prospective, Proof-of-concept Trial
NCT04683497
Intraoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer
NCT04899739
Contrast-Enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound During Liver Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
NCT01526200
Assessing the Utility of Ultrasound Compared to Cross-Sectional Imaging in the Follow-up of Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma
NCT04424472
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* HIGH-RESOLUTION PANCREATIC PROTOCOL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) SCAN EXAMINATION: performed on at least 16-section multi-detector row (MD) CT and reviewed using multi-planar reconstructions, with images obtained following the oral administration of water and pancreatic protocol intravenous iopamidol, with images acquired in the pancreatic and portal venous phases of contrast enhancement, reconstructed as thin slice (at 1 mm - pancreatic phase or 2 mm - portal venous phase increments).
* EUS EXAMINATION: performed within 2 weeks of the MDCT, aiming visualization of the pancreas, main surrounding vascular structures, celiac and mediastinal lymph nodes, liver and left adrenal gland, with EUS-FNA performed at the discretion of the investigator/examiner to confirm/exclude metastases and for the confirmation of malignancy in the primary tumor. Patients confirmed by EUS as having distant metastases are to be deferred from the planned surgical intervention.
* SURGICAL INTERVENTION: aiming to provide curative intent (R0) resection.
* HISTOPATHOLOGICAL POSTOPERATIVE STAGING: with evaluation of loco-regional invasiveness and degree of complete surgical resection (R0/R1).
* FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS: with phone-calls on an every 6 month basis, for up to 2 years, retaining the following data: survival (or not), date of decease and its direct cause (if applicable), the presence of tumor recurrence (or not).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Potentially resectable pancreatic cancer
Patients with a confirmed pancreatic mass (suspected neoplastic) deemed resectable or borderline resectable on multislice (at least 16 simultaneously acquired slices) pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT), fit and willing to undergo surgery with a curative (R0) intent.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* the presence of a confirmed pancreatic mass (suspected neoplastic) deemed resectable or borderline resectable on multislice (at least 16 simultaneously acquired slices) pancreatic protocol computed tomography (CT);
* patients fit and willing to undergo surgery with a curative (R0) intent;
* sign of the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* previous neo-adjuvant oncologic therapy;
* distant metastases;
* lack of discernment;
* refusal to sign the informed consent..
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova
OTHER
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
OTHER
Institutul Clinic Fundeni
OTHER
Clinical Hospital Colentina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mihai Rimbas
MD, PhD, Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mihai Rimbas, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinical Hospital Colentina, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Cristian R Baicus, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Clinical Hospital Colentina, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Adrian Saftoiu, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Craiova research Center in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Craiova University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Research Center in Gastroenterogy and Hepatology
Craiova, Dolj, Romania
University Military Hospital
Bucharest, , Romania
Gastroenterology Department, Clinical Hospital Colentina
Bucharest, , Romania
Fundeni Clinical Institute
Bucharest, , Romania
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine
Cluj-Napoca, , Romania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Col-gastro 5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.