SIMPLIFY the Hand Hygiene Procedure - Three Steps Versus Six Steps for Performing Hand Hygiene (SIMPLIFY Study)

NCT ID: NCT04187040

Last Updated: 2025-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-31

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hand hygiene is one of the most important measures to prevent healthcare associated infections. A hand hygiene technique consisting of three steps may be superior to the 6-step technique outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) in terms of compliance with both indications and technique. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare compliance with hand hygiene indications and technique between a 3-step and the 6-step technique for applying hand rub in an international multicenter cluster randomized trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hand hygiene is one of the most important measures to prevent transmission of pathogens between healthcare workers and patients, and ultimately, healthcare-associated infections. However, compliance with both hand hygiene indications and technique (outlining the steps for applying hand rub to ensure coverage of all surfaces of the hands) remains insufficient at most institutions worldwide. It was previously demonstrated that a hand hygiene technique consisting of three steps is superior to the 6-step technique outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) in terms of compliance with both indications and technique in a single center study. Furthermore, the 3-step technique was non-inferior regarding microbiological efficacy in two experimental studies and during daily clinical practice. To further investigate the external validity and generalizability of these findings to different settings, this study compares both compliance with hand hygiene indications and technique between the 3-step and the 6-step technique for applying hand rub in an international multicenter cluster randomized trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hand Hygiene

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

All participating wards will be randomly assigned with a 1:1 allocation to either the intervention (3-step hand hygiene technique) or the control group (6-step hand hygiene technique). Randomization will be stratified by participating institution for balanced allocation. Within each stratum, block randomization will be applied to assign wards to the two study groups. Blocking will be used to ensure close balance of the number of wards assigned to each group at any time during the study. Stratified randomization will be performed to ensure balance of the two groups within each institution.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3-step hand hygiene technique

Wards assigned to this study arm will receive instructions, educational materials and tutorials about the 3-step hand hygiene technique.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Study intervention: 3-step hand hygiene technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

3-step hand hygiene technique:

1. Covering all surfaces of the hands (based on own judgement)
2. Rotational rubbing of fingertips in the palm of the alternate hand
3. Rotational rubbing of both thumbs

6-step hand hygiene technique

Wards assigned to this study arm will receive instructions, educational materials and tutorials about the 6-step hand hygiene technique.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control intervention: 6-step hand hygiene technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

6-step hand hygiene technique (according to the WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care, First Global Patient Safety Challenge):

1. Rubbing hands palm to palm
2. Palm to palm with fingers interlaced
3. Right palm over left dorsum with interlaced fingers and vice versa
4. Back of fingers to opposing palms with fingers interlocked
5. Rotational rubbing of left thumb clasped in right palm and vice versa
6. Rotational rubbing backwards and forwards with clasped fingers of right hand in left palm and vice versa

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Study intervention: 3-step hand hygiene technique

3-step hand hygiene technique:

1. Covering all surfaces of the hands (based on own judgement)
2. Rotational rubbing of fingertips in the palm of the alternate hand
3. Rotational rubbing of both thumbs

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Control intervention: 6-step hand hygiene technique

6-step hand hygiene technique (according to the WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care, First Global Patient Safety Challenge):

1. Rubbing hands palm to palm
2. Palm to palm with fingers interlaced
3. Right palm over left dorsum with interlaced fingers and vice versa
4. Back of fingers to opposing palms with fingers interlocked
5. Rotational rubbing of left thumb clasped in right palm and vice versa
6. Rotational rubbing backwards and forwards with clasped fingers of right hand in left palm and vice versa

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Health Care Workers (HCW) working at the randomized wards during the pre-defined timeframe

Exclusion Criteria

Individuals, who are no HCWs
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sarah Tschudin Sutter, Prof.Dr.med.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sarah Tschudin Sutter, Prof.Dr.med.

Role: CONTACT

+41 61 328 68 10

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-01071;me19Tschudinsutter2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.