Effect of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a on the Early Anti-infective Schemes in Patients With Open Air Pneumonia
NCT ID: NCT04178382
Last Updated: 2019-11-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
146 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-08-01
2020-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prolonged Intravenous Infusion of β-lactam Antibiotics in Early Septic Patients
NCT05024565
PCT Guided Antibiotics Use in Critically Ill Adult Patients in China
NCT06945510
CRP Versus PCT as Bio-markers for Sepsis and in Guiding Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients
NCT04049565
Procalcitonin to Shorten Antibiotics Duration in ICU Patients
NCT01379547
Evaluation in the Treatment of Nosocomial Sepsis Comparing Polymerase Chain Reaction With Conventional Blood Culture.
NCT01450358
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are three traditional methods for detecting pathogenic microorganisms: 1. microbial culture method is the most traditional means of identifying pathogen. It is necessary to inoculate the patient's body fluid, blood, etc. in a suitable medium, incubate in a suitable incubator, and then pass the drug. Sensitivity tests determine the resistance of microorganisms, usually takes 3-7 days. For some specific types of pathogenic microorganisms or microorganisms with harsh growth conditions, there may be negative culture results. Therefore, the traditional culture methods have disadvantages such as poor timeliness, relatively high requirements, and low positive culture rate (30-40%). 2. time-of-flight mass spectrometry: the mass spectrometry technique is used to analyze and detect the protein components of the strain, and the characteristic peak spectrum is obtained. Compared with the bacterial map in the database, the bacteria can be judged by matching. The method can be shortened by about 6-8 hours compared with the conventional culture method, but since the detection of the colony needs to reach a certain amount, the specimen can not be directly detected after obtaining the specimen, and the preliminary microbial culture is required. Therefore, the detection time still takes 1-2 days or more, and there is also the disadvantage of low timeliness. In addition, it is necessary to compare the expansion and standardization of the database, and the inability to analyze the resistance of microorganisms is also the inadequacy of the detection technology. 3. High-throughput sequencing technology: With the rapid development of molecular biology in recent years, high-throughput sequencing technology is widely used in the early diagnosis of clinical microbiology, the principle is mainly through the connection of the universal linker to the fragmentation to be sequenced. Genomic DNA, which produces tens of millions of single-molecule polyclonal polymerase chain reaction arrays, then performs large-scale primer hybridization and enzyme extension reactions, and obtains complete DNA sequence information by computer analysis. However, this technology is difficult to effectively distinguish between pathogenic bacteria and background bacteria, technology and database to be standardized, detection time still takes about 2 days, can not obtain microbial resistance, expensive and other shortcomings At the office. In summary, the current time limit for targeted anti-infective treatment is stopped 2 days after the specimen is taken. Therefore, the search for new, pathogenic microbial detection technology that is faster, more accurate and more sensitive is a hotspot and a difficult point in the field of microbial and anti-infective research in recent years.
The PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combination technology of alveolar lavage fluid developed by the College of Life Sciences of Nanjing University is based on PCR amplification and fluorescence signal detection twice to achieve the detection of the presence and absence of specific DNA sequences in the test sample. technology. The determination of the detection result of the clinical sample pathogen is based on the comparison of the fluorescence results of the PCR product of the sample DNAD with the fluorescence detection results of the positive control (PC) and the negative control (NC) as a standard. The specific recognition function of the CRISPR/Cas12a system relies on the specific guidance and binding of the crRNA to specific DNA, and the specificity of the crRNA is determined by detection of a positive control of a common pathogen by a single crRNA. The detection technology is highly specific and takes only 2-3 hours, which is a qualitative leap in the detection time compared to the conventional technology.
In order to verify the feasibility and accuracy of the technology, the Center and the Nanjing University of Life Sciences for the common pathogens of ICU pneumonia (Acinetobacter baumannii, MRSA, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, etc.) for alveolar A preliminary study of the PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combined detection technique for lavage fluid. Twenty-nine specimens of lower respiratory tract alveolar lavage fluid were cultured by conventional bacterial culture method and combined with PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a. The results showed that the accuracy of detection and identification of pathogens based on PCR-Cas12a technology reached 93.10% (27/29). For the 27 specimens, the pathogens infected by the traditional isolation culture method can be detected by PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a technology. The two exceptions were the detection of Acinetobacter baumannii in the No. 6 sample by the traditional isolation culture method and the detection of Proteus mirabilis in the No. 13 sample (not within the range of pathogens detected). Moreover, the pathogens identified by the PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combination technique were more than one or two different than the traditional culture methods, which was consistent with the PCR, suggesting that the sensitivity is much higher than that of conventional microbial culture, and the results are reliable. These preliminary results indicate that the PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combined detection technique has good accuracy and high sensitivity.
Based on those, the research team speculated that the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a detection technology of alveolar lavage fluid to guide anti-infective treatment of pneumonia patients can achieve targeted anti-infective treatment and improve patient prognosis. To validate the above hypothesis, we designed a multicenter randomized prospective study comparing the effects of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a combined detection with alveolar lavage fluid and traditional microbial detection techniques on antimicrobial adjustment and prognosis in patients with ICU pneumonia. It aims to find more rapid, accurate and sensitive microbial detection technology for patients with pneumonia, and to achieve earlier precision treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
experiment group
Combined detection of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a in alveolar lavage fluid to guide early target adjustment of antibiotics
PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detection
Evaluate whether the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a detection of alveolar lavage fluid changes the choice of early antibiotics in patients with pneumonia in artificial airways, and whether it changes the prognosis compared with traditional pathogenic microbial detection techniques.
control group
Guide the target adjustment of antibiotics according to traditional microbiological detection methods
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detection
Evaluate whether the combination of PCR and CRISPR/Cas12a detection of alveolar lavage fluid changes the choice of early antibiotics in patients with pneumonia in artificial airways, and whether it changes the prognosis compared with traditional pathogenic microbial detection techniques.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients with artificial airway and expected artificial airway for more than 48 hours
* patients with suspected pneumonia or clear pneumonia
* signed informed consent
* expected ICU hospitalization more than 3 days.
Exclusion Criteria
* lactating women
* considered by the doctors for bronchoscopy moderate to severe asthma
* airway stenosis
* tracheal fistula, bronchopleural fistula
* expected to die or give up treatment within 72 hours
* participate in other clinical research
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese Medical Association
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
kui w yu, phd
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Affliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Almirall J, Bolibar I, Vidal J, Sauca G, Coll P, Niklasson B, Bartolome M, Balanzo X. Epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a population-based study. Eur Respir J. 2000 Apr;15(4):757-63. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.15d21.x.
Pletz MW, Wellinghausen N, Welte T. Will polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostics improve outcome in septic patients? A clinical view. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1069-76. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2245-x. Epub 2011 May 15.
Langelier C, Zinter MS, Kalantar K, Yanik GA, Christenson S, O'Donovan B, White C, Wilson M, Sapru A, Dvorak CC, Miller S, Chiu CY, DeRisi JL. Metagenomic Sequencing Detects Respiratory Pathogens in Hematopoietic Cellular Transplant Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb 15;197(4):524-528. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1097LE. No abstract available.
Kuti EL, Patel AA, Coleman CI. Impact of inappropriate antibiotic therapy on mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and blood stream infection: a meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2008 Mar;23(1):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.08.007.
Wang Y, Liang X, Jiang Y, Dong D, Zhang C, Song T, Chen M, You Y, Liu H, Ge M, Dai H, Xi F, Zhou W, Chen JQ, Wang Q, Chen Q, Yu W. Novel fast pathogen diagnosis method for severe pneumonia patients in the intensive care unit: randomized clinical trial. Elife. 2022 Oct 7;11:e79014. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79014.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-195-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.