Investigation of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Trifocal IOL

NCT ID: NCT04176965

Last Updated: 2025-01-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

539 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-28

Study Completion Date

2024-05-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double masked confirmatory trial comparing an investigational trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a commercially available monofocal IOL.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will include adult subjects with operable cataracts in both eyes who are eligible for phacoemulsification cataract surgery followed by IOL implantation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Eye Diseases Postcataract Aphakia Cataract Lens Opacities

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Approximately 501 subjects will be screened across up to 24 study sites to complete 300 subjects implanted bilaterally with the FINEVISION HP and 150 subjects implanted bilaterally with the control monofocal Alcon AcrySof SN60AT.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
In order to minimize bias, site personnel performing postoperative study assessments of visual performance will be masked to subject treatment assignment until after the final database lock ("masked assessors").

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FINEVISION HP

Trifocal FINEVISION HP. Cataractous lens will be removed in the study eyes and the FINEVISION HP will be implanted in the capsular bag.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FINEVISION HP IOL

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cataractous lens will be removed in the study eyes and the FINEVISION HP IOL will be implanted in the capsular bag.

Control Product

Cataractous lens will be removed in the study eyes and the Alcon AcrySof® SN60AT IOL will be implanted in the capsular bag.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Alcon AcrySof SN60AT

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cataractous lens will be removed in the study eyes and the Alcon AcrySof SN60AT IOL will be implanted in the capsular bag.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FINEVISION HP IOL

Cataractous lens will be removed in the study eyes and the FINEVISION HP IOL will be implanted in the capsular bag.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Alcon AcrySof SN60AT

Cataractous lens will be removed in the study eyes and the Alcon AcrySof SN60AT IOL will be implanted in the capsular bag.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female adults, age 22 years or older at the Preoperative Visit.
2. Visually significant cataracts in both eyes that are eligible for phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
3. Willing to undergo cataract surgery in the second operative eye within 7 - 30 days after surgery in the first eye.
4. Projected Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) of 0.2 logMAR (20/32 Snellen) or better in each eye after cataract surgery/IOL implantation, as determined by the medical judgement of the Investigator
5. Eligible for receipt of an IOL power within the range of the investigational IOL (+10.0 D to +30.0 D, in 0.50 D increments) in each eye
6. Contact lens users must be willing to discontinue wear of their lenses in accordance with the following requirements:

* Rigid gas permeable lenses for ≥ 7 days prior to the Preoperative Visit
* Soft contact lenses for ≥ 3 days prior to the Preoperative Visit Contact lens wearers must demonstrate a stable refraction (within ±0.50 D for both sphere and cylinder) in each eye, as determined by manifest refraction on two consecutive examination dates at least one week apart after discontinuation of contact lens wear.
7. Provide signed written consent prior to participation in any study-related procedures.
8. Ability, comprehension, and willingness to follow study instructions, and likely to complete all study visits.
9. Female subjects must be 1-year postmenopausal, surgically sterilized, or, if of childbearing potential, have a negative urine pregnancy test at the Preoperative Visit. Women of childbearing potential must use an acceptable form of contraception throughout the study. Acceptable methods include at least one of the following: intrauterine (intrauterine device), hormonal (oral, injection, patch, implant, ring), barrier with spermicide (condom, diaphragm), or abstinence.

Exclusion Criteria

1. History or presence of, or predisposition to, degenerative visual disorders (e.g., macular degeneration, retinal detachment, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, or other retinal disorders) predicted to result in BCDVA worse than 0.2 LogMAR (20/32 Snellen) in either eye during the study participation period.
2. Significant anterior segment pathology in either eye that might increase intraoperative risk or compromise IOL stability (e.g., pseudoexfoliation syndrome)
3. Reasonably expected to require secondary ocular surgical intervention or laser treatment other than YAG capsulotomy in either eye during the study participation period.
4. Presence of one or more clinically significant corneal abnormalities in either eye, including corneal dystrophy, irregularity, or edema per the Investigator's medical opinion.
5. Previous intraocular, corneal, or retinal detachment surgery, including corneal transplant, LASIK, astigmatic keratotomy and limbal relaxing incisions in either eye
6. Rubella, congenital, traumatic or complicated cataract in either eye
7. Preoperative keratometric astigmatism \> 1.0 D or irregular corneal astigmatism in either eye (Note: corneal incisions intended to reduce astigmatism are not permitted)
8. Clinically significant ocular inflammation or infection present ≤ 30 days in either eye prior to the Preoperative Visit.
9. Presence or history of one or more severe/serious ocular conditions (e.g., glaucoma, uveitis, ocular infection, severe dry eye) in either eye, or any other unstable medical condition (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes) that in the opinion of the Investigator would put the subject's health at risk, confound the results of the study and/or prevent the subject from completing all study visits.
10. Use of medications known to interfere with visual performance, pupil dilation, or iris structure ≤ 30 days prior to the Preoperative Visit.
11. Participation in any study of an investigational, interventional product within 30 days prior to the Preoperative Visit or at any time during the study period.
12. Pregnant or nursing females.
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beaver-Visitec International, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mitchell C Shultz MD/Shultz Chang Vision

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Coastal Vision Medical Group

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Arbor Centers for Eye Care

Orland Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Michael Washburn Center for Ophthalmic Research

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Vance Thompson Vision, MN Site

Alexandria, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Chu Vision Institute

Bloomington, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Vance Thompson Vision, MT Site

Bozeman, Montana, United States

Site Status

Vance Thompson Vision NE Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Center For Sight

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Eye Associates & SurgiCenter

Vineland, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Vance Thompson Vision ND Site

West Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Eye Clinic

Brecksville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Associates in Ophthalmology Ltd

West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Vance Thompson Vision. SD Site

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Key-Whitman Eye Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lehmann Eye Center

Nacogdoches, Texas, United States

Site Status

Parkhurst Nuvision

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Eye Institute of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Piedmont Eye Center

Lynchburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PHY1903

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clareon Toric vs Eyhance Toric
NCT05481125 COMPLETED NA