System for Quantifying the Functional Strength of the Grip and Pinch Movements
NCT ID: NCT04174729
Last Updated: 2019-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-08-05
2019-10-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigation of Factors Affecting Upper Extremity Function in Healthy Young Adults
NCT06937879
Grip Movement Training for Adults With Fine Motor Limitation
NCT03750045
The Effects of Mental Practice Combined With Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Muscle Strength of Upper Limb and Hand Grip
NCT03767413
Investigation of Functional Parameters
NCT06602401
Effects of Core Stabilization on Hand Trauma Outcomes
NCT07026747
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hand strength
The tests were performed in two sessions lasting 1 hour each. The volunteers used the devices: door handle, tap, door pull handle, switch and door key to quantify hand strength. The tests were performed in two sessions lasting 1 hour each. The volunteers used the devices: door handle, tap, door pull handle, switch and door key to quantify hand strength.
In the first session, the volunteers performed the movements 3 times in each device of daily living activities with the right limb, with a 1-minute rest interval between the 3 measurements. The entire procedure performed in the session was repeated again after 30 minutes to verify the reliability and reproducibility of the Intra-evaluator test. The Inter-rater test was repeated after 7 days by the second rater to analyze reliability between the rater.
handgrip strength
First, the hand measurements of each volunteer were evaluated, followed by the measurement of handgrip strength using the Jamar® dynamometer. And later the tests were performed using the system that contains the 5 devices to quantify the hand strength.
Door handle device
To evaluate the cylindrical grip movement, a door handle was used, which evaluated the full force in the range of motion.
Tap device
To evaluate the spherical grip movement, a tap was used, which evaluated the full force in the range of motion.
Door pull handle
To assess the hook grip movement, a door pull handle was used, which assessed the full force in the range of motion
Linear Switch device
To evaluate the pulp-pulp pinch movement, a switch was used, which evaluated the full force in the movement of the movement.
Door Key device
To assess the pulp-side pinch movement, a door key was used, which evaluated the full force in the range of motion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
handgrip strength
First, the hand measurements of each volunteer were evaluated, followed by the measurement of handgrip strength using the Jamar® dynamometer. And later the tests were performed using the system that contains the 5 devices to quantify the hand strength.
Door handle device
To evaluate the cylindrical grip movement, a door handle was used, which evaluated the full force in the range of motion.
Tap device
To evaluate the spherical grip movement, a tap was used, which evaluated the full force in the range of motion.
Door pull handle
To assess the hook grip movement, a door pull handle was used, which assessed the full force in the range of motion
Linear Switch device
To evaluate the pulp-pulp pinch movement, a switch was used, which evaluated the full force in the movement of the movement.
Door Key device
To assess the pulp-side pinch movement, a door key was used, which evaluated the full force in the range of motion.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* male and female,
* have preserved cognitive functions,
* absence of neurological disorder
* who present minimum grip strength by the Jamar ® dynamometer, in the age group of 20-29 years men 45.08 ± 0.67 kg and women of 27.2 ± 0.46 kg, who present minimum grip strength by the dynamometer Jamar ®, aged 30 to 39 years old men 46.05 ± 0.47 kg and women 28.0 ± 0.39 kg, using the mean minus the standard deviation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Do not accept to participate in the survey.
20 Years
39 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Mogi das Cruzes
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Terigi Augusto Scardovelli
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Silvia R Boschi, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Mogi das Cruzes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Silvia Regina Matos da Silva Boschi
Mogi das Cruzes, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19020219.2.0000.5497
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.