Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
51 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-08-01
2017-05-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Abstract Objectives: Handball is a popular sport in many countries. There is lack of knowledge about handball athlete's functional movement capacity. The aim of this study is to investigate the Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) scores, to evaluate the injury risks of handball athletes and to determine its relationship with athletic performance.
Design: Observational study. Methods: A total of 51 professional handball players in Turkey were included in this study. The sport-specific features and demographic data were recorded. The functional movement analysis was performed and agility and balance and force were evaluated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ASSESSMENT OF THE HANDBALL PLAYERS
NCT05861882
Task-oriented Arm/Hand Skill Rehabilitation and Therapy Dose Dimensions in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
NCT05452707
Investigation of Factors Affecting Upper Extremity Function in Healthy Young Adults
NCT06937879
Effect of Mulligan Movement Mobilization Technique on Elbow Joint Proprioception
NCT05261347
Outcome Measures of Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Versus Dual Task Training on Upper Extremity and Cognitive Functions in Patients With Hemiparesis
NCT06457022
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Functional Movement Screen
Movement Analysis for injury risk
Functional Movement Screen
Vertical Jump Test
Jump test Height Measurement, Functional Movement Screen
Functional Movement Screen
Y Balance Test
Functional lower extremity reach with balance, Functional Movement Screen
Functional Movement Screen
Illinois Agility Test
Agility measurement, Functional Movement Screen
Functional Movement Screen
Injury History
Athletes injury history for last year was recorded as injury count.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Functional Movement Screen
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have not had a surgical operation involving the musculoskeletal system in the last six months
* Not having an obstacle to the realization of the tests to be carried out in the study
* Volunteering to participate in the work
Exclusion Criteria
* Do not want to go on study
16 Years
35 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medipol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Emre Serdar Vayvay
Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Devrim Tarakcı, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medipol University
Emre Serdar Vayvay, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Medipol University
Candan Algun, PhD,Prof
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Medipol University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 May;1(2):62-72.
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Aug;1(3):132-9.
Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;4(2):92-9.
Hachana Y, Chaabene H, Nabli MA, Attia A, Moualhi J, Farhat N, Elloumi M. Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of the Illinois agility test in male team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Oct;27(10):2752-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182890ac3.
Raya MA, Gailey RS, Gaunaurd IA, Jayne DM, Campbell SM, Gagne E, Manrique PG, Muller DG, Tucker C. Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(7):951-60. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096.
Carlock JM, Smith SL, Hartman MJ, Morris RT, Ciroslan DA, Pierce KC, Newton RU, Harman EA, Sands WA, Stone MH. The relationship between vertical jump power estimates and weightlifting ability: a field-test approach. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):534-9. doi: 10.1519/R-13213.1.
Atalay ES, Tarakci D, Algun C. Are the functional movement analysis scores of handball players related to athletic parameters? J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Dec 27;14(6):954-959. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836372.186. eCollection 2018 Dec.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10840098-604.01.01-E.13036
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.