Management of Device Detected AT and Impact of Device Treatment Algorithms on Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT04172883

Last Updated: 2021-09-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-01

Study Completion Date

2022-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The MANDATE-AF study was designed to address evidence needs in India for device-based management of AF using AT/AF (Atrial Tachycardia/Atrial fibrillation) diagnostic features and therapies such as Reactive Atrial anti tachycardia Pacing (rATP) within Medtronic Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED)and its impact on the time to persistent AF and progression of AT/AF.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

New generation Cardiac Implantable Electronic devices (CIED's)such as Pacemakers, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) has diagnostic and treatment delivery features which helps in slowing the progression of Atrial Fibrillation. A Study conducted in Europe, called the MINERVA Trial, showed the efficacy of a feature within Medtronic CIED's called (rATP)™, in the termination of abnormal rhythms by pacing stimuli, and clinical benefit in reducing incidence of Atrial Fibrillation. However, there is dearth of local evidence of this within the Indian population and also a need to show that turning on rATP does not compromise on battery depletion.

The MANDATE-AF study is a prospective , Interventional , Randomized, single blind study aiming to show that a reduced sequence programming of this rATP therapy ,can improve device battery longevity and is as effective as the Minerva trial ATP programming when it comes to showing its impact on time to persistent AF and on the progression of AT/AF within the Indian population.

The study analyses patients implanted with a Medtronic cardiac implantable device with an atrial lead and equipped with atrial ATP therapies.

The patients will be randomized into two groups:

* an interventional arm including patients with a conservative atrial ATP therapies programming setting
* a control, arm including patients with the same atrial ATP therapies programming setting adopted in the Minerva Trial

Cardiovascular events will be collected prospectively for at least 24 months after enrollment. Physicians will be recommended to schedule in clinic follow-up visits every 6 months and remote follow-up visits every 3 months in between. Every patient will be followed for at least 24 months, until the last patient enrolled exits the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The patient is unaware of which type of programming changes have been made ( whether it is the reduced sequence programming or the standard Minerva setting )

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control arm

The devices on the study are all commercially available and enabled with reactive ATP( rATP)feature, for the study both arms will have rATP switched on with one arm on the standard device setting or MINERVA setting ( control arm)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Treatment arm

The devices on the study are all commercially available and enabled with reactive ATP( rATP)feature, for the study both arms will have rATP switched on with one arm on the reduced sequence programming ( treatment arm)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Treatment arm

Intervention Type OTHER

All pts are implanted with rATP enabled devices prior to the study start , the only intervention in both arms is switching on rATP and in the treatment arm programming changes done to optimize the rATP sequence delivery of therapy and prevent the patient from going into permanent or persistent AF

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treatment arm

All pts are implanted with rATP enabled devices prior to the study start , the only intervention in both arms is switching on rATP and in the treatment arm programming changes done to optimize the rATP sequence delivery of therapy and prevent the patient from going into permanent or persistent AF

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

programming changes

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1 Subject is implanted with a Medtronic cardiac implantable device with an atrial lead equipped with atrial ATP therapies (rATP) enabled no longer than 18 months and at the minimum 6 weeks has passed since the implant; 2. Age \> 55 years; 3. Subject provides informed consent; 4. Subject is willing and able to comply with the study procedures; 5. Subject has documented history of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, or one or more of the risk factors for developing AF as per AHA/HRS (American heart Association/Heart rhythm Society) guidelines.

* Age \> 60 years;
* Stroke/TIA (Transient ischemic Attack);
* Diabetes;
* High Blood Pressure;
* Coronary artery disease;
* Cardiomyopathy;
* Pericardial inflammation;
* Prior heart attacks;
* Congestive heart failure;
* Structural heart disease (valve problems or congenital defects);
* Prior open-heart surgery;
* Untreated atrial flutter (another type of abnormal heart rhythm);
* Thyroid disease;
* Chronic lung disease;
* Sleep apnea;
* Excessive alcohol use;
* Serious illness or infection.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients are not eligible to be enrolled in the study if any of the following criteria is met:

1. Subject has been implanted with a Medtronic cardiac implantable device with an atrial lead equipped with atrial ATP therapies (rATP) enabled for more than 18 months;
2. Subject is in permanent AF or persistent AF at the baseline visit:

1. The definition of permanent AF will be based on the physicians' decision that nothing further can be done to cardiovert the patient or, in historical cases, the investigators will refer to the Cardiac Compass reports:
2. The definition of persistent AF at baseline will refer to the Cardiac Compass reports (\>7 consecutive days in AF with the last day being the day of enrollment)
3. Participation in other studies which could potentially conflict with this study;
4. Legal incapacity or evidence that a subject cannot understand the purpose and risks of the study or inability to comply fully with study procedures and follow up.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shantanu Sarkar, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Medtronic, PLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Care Institute of medical sciences and research

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Site Status

Apollo Hospital , Bannerghatta

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Apollo BGS Hospital

Mysore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Aster Medicity

Kochi, Kerala, India

Site Status

Sir Ganga Ram Hospital

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Site Status

Fortis Escorts Heart Institute

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Site Status

Apollo Hospital

Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India

Site Status

Fortis Escort Hospital

Mohali, Punjab, India

Site Status

Eternal Heart Care center and Research

Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Site Status

Apollo Hospital

Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Site Status

AIG hospital

Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002 Oct 1;113(5):359-64. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01236-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12401529 (View on PubMed)

Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, Singer DE. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2370-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2370.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11343485 (View on PubMed)

Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, Van Gelder IC, Al-Attar N, Hindricks G, Prendergast B, Heidbuchel H, Alfieri O, Angelini A, Atar D, Colonna P, De Caterina R, De Sutter J, Goette A, Gorenek B, Heldal M, Hohloser SH, Kolh P, Le Heuzey JY, Ponikowski P, Rutten FH; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Europace. 2010 Oct;12(10):1360-420. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq350. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20876603 (View on PubMed)

Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Oct 16;82(8A):2N-9N. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00583-9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9809895 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MDT18039

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

European CURE-AF Study
NCT04645615 COMPLETED NA
Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent AF With HF
NCT07153718 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Abbott Atrial Fibrillation Post Approval Study
NCT05434650 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING